The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Beginners question - The Equivalence Principle and Relativity?!?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Beginners question - The Equivalence Principle and Relativity?!?

  • 3 Replies
  • 4036 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alinta (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 14
  • Activity:
    0%
Beginners question - The Equivalence Principle and Relativity?!?
« on: 05/03/2013 05:56:22 »
The equivalence principle states that you cannot distinguish pure linear acceleration from gravity. An example of this in a video that I just watched is being inside a small elevator going downwards.

In theories of relativity (sorry, too much of a beginner to know if it is general or special) it is stated that you cannot tell you are moving if you are going at a constant velocity. But if you are travelling along the highway and apply more acceleration, you will be pushed back in your seat a little as you feel a force pushing you backwards (not quite sure what exact force that is... gravity?).

So: moving at a constant velocity = no feeling of movement.
Moving at a constant acceleration = feels like gravity.

But if gravity on earth makes all things fall at the same rate once they reach 9.8m/s/s, how is it possible for an acceleration to feel like gravity? Wouldn't they reach a constant velocity and thus cancel out a feeling of acceleration?

So when my teacher says it 'feels like gravity' I'm a bit unsure what this means. Right now, given the above, I am completely unsure as to what gravity could possibly 'feel' like at all...

(Sorry if I have written some of the details incorrectly)

Cheers
Alinta
« Last Edit: 05/03/2013 06:00:46 by Alinta »
Logged
 



Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
Re: Beginners question - The Equivalence Principle and Relativity?!?
« Reply #1 on: 05/03/2013 14:57:13 »
Quote from: Alinta on 05/03/2013 05:56:22
But if gravity on earth makes all things fall at the same rate once they reach 9.8m/s/s, how is it possible for an acceleration to feel like gravity? Wouldn't they reach a constant velocity and thus cancel out a feeling of acceleration?

I think you might be confusing acceleration and velocity.  9.8 m/s/s is a constant acceleration, not a velocity.  If you were sitting in a rocket accelerating at constant rate of 9.8 m/s/s (meaning your velocity is increasing by 9.8 m/s every second), you feel yourself pressed to the floor of the ship with the same force as if it were sitting on the earth's surface.
Logged
 

Offline Alinta (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 14
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Beginners question - The Equivalence Principle and Relativity?!?
« Reply #2 on: 06/03/2013 01:58:30 »
Doh! Thanks JP! I was driving myself mad there thinking about it!
Logged
 

Offline Pmb

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Physicist
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: Beginners question - The Equivalence Principle and Relativity?!?
« Reply #3 on: 06/03/2013 02:04:12 »
Quote from: Alinta on 06/03/2013 01:58:30
Doh! Thanks JP! I was driving myself mad there thinking about it!
To be precise, a uniform gravitational field is equivalent to a uniformly accelerating frame of reference. However if the field is not uniform, i.e. there are tidal gradients present in the gravitational fied, then this principle only holds locally, i.e. given the precision of your instruments and there is a small enough region and short enough time interval so that you can't tell tell the diffence between gravity and acceleration. A lot of people miss this part of the equivalence principle.

I recommend that you read my article on this subject. Show it to your teacher too.
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0204044
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.241 seconds with 35 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.