The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Richard Feynmann's QED
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Richard Feynmann's QED

  • 2 Replies
  • 4030 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PAOLO137 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 32
  • Activity:
    0%
Richard Feynmann's QED
« on: 21/06/2013 13:55:14 »
I am an aged and retired physicist. For this reason I enjoy reading all possible books concerning the subjects that have to do with the second half
of last century, trying to understand the maximum. This time I found myself in difficulty with that marvelous book by Richard Feynman.
He probably had the intention of being understood in the best way, but instead I found some very obscure concepts. I wonder if somebody can clarify those to me. He suggest the reader to imagine the travel of a photon through the space made up of a succession of "arrows" each one  attached to the previous one. (A common sum of vectors). Then he suggests to imagine , attached to each of these arrows, something like a
small clock, with a single hand rotating at very high speed. The combination of the point of the arrow and of the position (angle) of the little hand
of the clock, would give the information required to draw the following arrow. I must confess that I have not understood the meaning of this little watch. Is it intended to represent the phase of the wave who "forms" the travelling  photon? I think to understand that it was an idea to facilitate
the understanding of the people attending the lectures from which the book was transcribed, but he should have been more clear. Thank you for
any comments, Paolo .
Logged
Paolo de Magistris
 



Offline imatfaal

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2782
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • rouge moderator
Re: Richard Feynmann's QED
« Reply #1 on: 21/06/2013 15:55:48 »
Paolo

If I remember correctly it is the vector - representing the state of whatever is being measured at the time - which can be visualized as taking on a direction dependent on time (ie rotating).  Ie the vector sums of various paths can be then added and the directions of the vectors can lead to an analogy of constructive, destructive interference

I have attached a link of the Feynman lectures at the University of Auckland - which I believe were a more popular version of his magnum opus on qm  http://vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8

Not sure if any of above helps - but I hope so
Logged
There’s no sense in being precise when you don’t even know what you’re talking about.  John Von Neumann

At the surface, we may appear as intellects, helpful people, friendly staff or protectors of the interwebs. Deep down inside, we're all trolls. CaptainPanic @ sf.n
 

Offline PAOLO137 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 32
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Richard Feynmann's QED
« Reply #2 on: 27/08/2013 18:23:59 »
You  gave me a wonderful hint. Reading "QED" I knew that Feynman wished to try a reharsal of
his lectures in New Zealand, just to be confident people was ready to accept the unusual things
he was going to tell, in such a far away location. To have the chance to watch that story "live"
was a real emotional adventure for me. Thanks to you!! Paolo.
Logged
Paolo de Magistris
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.982 seconds with 32 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.