The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. I succeeded in touching distance:
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

I succeeded in touching distance:

  • 8 Replies
  • 5695 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline VictorEliasEspinozaGuedez (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 131
  • Activity:
    0%
I succeeded in touching distance:
« on: 28/12/2014 15:20:43 »
Logged
 



Offline VictorEliasEspinozaGuedez (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 131
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: I succeeded in touching distance:
« Reply #1 on: 28/12/2014 15:21:13 »
Quantified...

I used a disk CD and a motor of 1.5 volts.

I placed a plastic lid for the test on the CD.

With the same force of the fingers, turn the CD towards the two sides.

One side rotates twice and the other side rotates 1 and 1/2.

Are shown to the CD stops turning to one side.

(I will continue measuring).

Very affectionately,
VĂ­ctor Elias Espinoza Guedez
27 December 2014
Logged
 

Offline David Cooper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2876
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 38 times
Re: I succeeded in touching distance:
« Reply #2 on: 28/12/2014 19:01:35 »
Okay, I've got the cat cooked and in the dish. I've tried turning it lots of different ways. What do I do next? Should I eat it while it's still hot.
Logged
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
Re: I succeeded in touching distance:
« Reply #3 on: 28/12/2014 23:20:01 »
Quote from: VictorEliasEspinozaGuedez on 28/12/2014 15:20:43
[ Invalid Attachment ]

The moment of inertia of an object depends on the way you rotate it : rotating it one way can be easier than rotating it another way , even though its weight remains the same ,

e.g. Picking up a broom-handle which is lying on the floor is easier when you hold it in the middle than when you hold it at the end , even though it still weighs the same , ( no black holes required).

see ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_moments_of_inertia
  [ search for the word "about" and "axis" on that wikipedia page ].

* dishes44k.jpg (42.47 kB, 630x726 - viewed 795 times.)
« Last Edit: 28/12/2014 23:31:50 by RD »
Logged
 

Offline VictorEliasEspinozaGuedez (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 131
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: I succeeded in touching distance:
« Reply #4 on: 29/12/2014 02:02:39 »
It is how blowing sideways.
Logged
 



Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
Re: I succeeded in touching distance:
« Reply #5 on: 29/12/2014 09:10:11 »
Put it another way , twirling a rod like a majorettes baton is easier than waving the same rod like a magic wand ...

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_moments_of_inertia#List_of_3D_inertia_tensors

* Twirling baton Vs Waving magic wand.png (20.61 kB, 713x365 - viewed 872 times.)
Logged
 

Offline VictorEliasEspinozaGuedez (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 131
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: I succeeded in touching distance:
« Reply #6 on: 29/12/2014 09:30:28 »
Quote from: RD on 29/12/2014 09:10:11
Put it another way , twirling a rod like a majorettes baton is easier than waving the same rod like a magic wand ...

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_moments_of_inertia#List_of_3D_inertia_tensors

These are not flat dishes
Logged
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
Re: I succeeded in touching distance:
« Reply #7 on: 29/12/2014 16:34:57 »
Quote from: VictorEliasEspinozaGuedez on 29/12/2014 09:30:28
These are not flat dishes

The same principle applies to a dish, or any shape : rotating it about one axis can be more difficult than rotating it about another because of the different moments-of-inertia ...

 [ Invalid Attachment ]
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/tdisc.html

* MoI-disk.png (83.79 kB, 689x594 - viewed 1886 times.)
Logged
 

Offline VictorEliasEspinozaGuedez (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 131
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: I succeeded in touching distance:
« Reply #8 on: 29/12/2014 18:33:10 »
Quote from: RD on 29/12/2014 16:34:57
Quote from: VictorEliasEspinozaGuedez on 29/12/2014 09:30:28
These are not flat dishes

The same principle applies to a dish, or any shape : rotating it about one axis can be more difficult than rotating it about another because of the different moments-of-inertia ...

 [ Invalid Attachment ]
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/tdisc.html

I say turn the disk how a ventillador.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.359 seconds with 45 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.