The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Could a large unknown mass be causing universe expansion?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Could a large unknown mass be causing universe expansion?

  • 1 Replies
  • 3170 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thedoc (OP)

  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 21 times
Could a large unknown mass be causing universe expansion?
« on: 16/02/2016 21:50:01 »
Wayne Inglis  asked the Naked Scientists:
   Dark Energy is proposed as an explanation of why the universe is expanding at an increasing rate.
Why can't a simpler explanation be that a huge unknown mass may exist outside our visible horizon that acts gravitationally to accelerate the galaxies in the same way that a spacecraft from earth initially slows then speeds up as it approaches the influence of the moons gravitational field?

Regards
Wayne (from South Australia)

   
What do you think?
« Last Edit: 16/02/2016 21:50:01 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline Space Flow

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 399
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 31 times
Re: Could a large unknown mass be causing universe expansion?
« Reply #1 on: 17/02/2016 01:50:39 »
Quote from: thedoc on 16/02/2016 21:50:01
Wayne Inglis  asked the Naked Scientists:
   Dark Energy is proposed as an explanation of why the universe is expanding at an increasing rate.
Dark Energy is a placeholder name for "we simply don't have an explanation what is the cause of the acceleration observed."
Dark energy as a placeholder name is in no way referring to anything specific and as such does not offer an explanation. Just a question mark.

Quote from: thedoc on 16/02/2016 21:50:01
Wayne Inglis  asked the Naked Scientists:
Why can't a simpler explanation be that a huge unknown mass may exist outside our visible horizon that acts gravitationally to accelerate the galaxies in the same way that a spacecraft from earth initially slows then speeds up as it approaches the influence of the moons gravitational field?
Because the effect is observed the same in all directions. A huge unknown mass would exist somewhere and give us observations in that direction.
Otherwise to agree with observations we would have to be totally surrounded by an equal amount of huge mass in every direction outside our observable Universe with us precisely positioned in the exact centre so as to see every direction behave the way it does.
Humanity at the centre of the Universe again.
Not likely.
Logged
We are made of Spacetime; with a sprinkling of Stardust.
Matter tells Spacetime how to Flow; Spacetime tells matter where to go
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.413 seconds with 28 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.