The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Could a Black hole be irradiating particles for mass production of photons?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Could a Black hole be irradiating particles for mass production of photons?

  • 1 Replies
  • 2452 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alex Dullius Siqueira (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 277
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 10 times
Could a Black hole be irradiating particles for mass production of photons?
« on: 05/07/2016 01:06:43 »
Could photons be considered as "deactivated matter"?
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Could a Black hole be irradiating particles for mass production of photons?
« Reply #1 on: 05/07/2016 13:20:14 »
Quote from: Alex Siqueira on 05/07/2016 01:06:43
Could photons be considered as "deactivated matter"?


I am not sure about matter, I normally associate matter with things that have mass although EMR is considered as matter, Photons do seem ''dormant'' when passing through space, buts seems is not necessarily the truth. When we set a measurement to start off at 0, we are really setting the equilibrium, so if we say lights has 0 net charge, that would not be entirely true.


Added - If we calibrated the equipment in the dark , ''tared'' off to zero, then maybe we might measure a charge of light?
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Alex Dullius Siqueira



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.093 seconds with 31 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.