The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Spiral Galaxies -- is there a 1/R gravity force -- or Dark Matter?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Spiral Galaxies -- is there a 1/R gravity force -- or Dark Matter?

  • 0 Replies
  • 1856 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mad aetherist (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 791
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Spiral Galaxies -- is there a 1/R gravity force -- or Dark Matter?
« on: 14/12/2018 00:34:26 »
In spiral galaxies the orbital speeds of stars do not appear to follow the expected Newtonian 1/RR relationship, they appear to follow a 1/R relationship.  As there is no good theory for a 1/R relationship the preferred answer is that every galaxy contains hidden mass made up of some sort of Dark Matter.

I looked at the equation for centrifugal force which is   F=Mvv/R. 
And the equation for gravity force is    F=GMm/RR.
This means that the orbital speed    v=(GM/R)^0.5.

But if the equation for gravity force was      F=GMm/R    then   v=(GM)^0.5.
This means that the graph for orbital speed versus radius should be a horizontal line (notice that R is missing)(R is not relevant).   Cosmologists draw prediction curves for orbital speed versus radius in a spiral galaxy based on   1/R  (merely to illustrate)(they don’t believe in  1/R), but these  1/R  prediction curves are not horizontal straight lines, they are a curve dipping slightly below horizontal.  I guess that this is because a spiral galaxy isn’t like a thin disc, it has a bulge.  The bulge introduces some off-plane components of the gravity force & the components perpendicular to the plane cancel leaving just the Cosine.

The plots for the actual measured speeds for any particular spiral galaxy describe a curve dipping down below horizontal a little, following almost exactly their predicted  1/R  curves.
 
On the other hand the predicted curves for  1/RR  drop quickly towards the xx axis & are hopeless.  There certainly is a problem with Newton.

Everyone agrees that the gravity force due to an infinitely long cylinder varies as per  1/R.   A thin slice of that cylinder can represent a spiral galaxy.  If u take away the remainder of the cylinder then praps the thin slice retains that there  1/R  relationship.  Or does it revert immediately to  1/RR?
 
I am mulling this  1/R  stuff.   Suggestions welcome.
« Last Edit: 14/12/2018 00:42:04 by mad aetherist »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.392 seconds with 24 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.