The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. How does one calculate velocity when using spherical coordinates?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How does one calculate velocity when using spherical coordinates?

  • 4 Replies
  • 5459 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kepler (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
How does one calculate velocity when using spherical coordinates?
« on: 26/09/2016 02:37:28 »
Hi,

I have a little doubt. I have, refered to the Sun, the cartesian positions and velocities of an asteroid (in x, y and z coordinates - 6 values in 3D dimensional space). I can easely calculate the polar coordinates (longitude and latitude - along with distance). My doubt is: how do I calculate the longitude and latitude speed in degrees/radians given the cartesian values? Is it the same way? I'm sorry for this stupid doubt....

Kind regards,

Kepler
« Last Edit: 26/09/2016 03:56:56 by chiralSPO »
Logged
 



Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3743
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 531 times
Re: Cartesian positions and velocities
« Reply #1 on: 26/09/2016 03:54:46 »
Yes, that's somewhat tricky!

It is certainly possible to calculate velocities using polar (spherical) coordinates, but it ends up (as far as I know) essentially involving a conversion from spherical to cartesian coordinates. This is fairly easy to do if the radius is not changing, just the latitude and longitude are changing with time--you can essentially convert from degrees (or radians) per unit time to distance per unit time (in the simplest case, where an object is moving in a great circle, the velocity and angular velocity are related only by the radius)

It gets more complicated if all three coordinates are changing. If the function of the motion is defined, it can be worked out from the function (ie parametric equations for r(t), [phi](t), and [theta](t))

PS: welcome to the forum! I have modified the title of this thread to be a question. Please, from now on when you start threads, make the title as a question posed. Thank you!
Logged
 

Offline William McC

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 158
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
Re: How does one calculate velocity when using spherical coordinates?
« Reply #2 on: 26/09/2016 04:56:22 »
Quote from: kepler on 26/09/2016 02:37:28
Hi,

I have a little doubt. I have, refered to the Sun, the cartesian positions and velocities of an asteroid (in x, y and z coordinates - 6 values in 3D dimensional space). I can easely calculate the polar coordinates (longitude and latitude - along with distance). My doubt is: how do I calculate the longitude and latitude speed in degrees/radians given the cartesian values? Is it the same way? I'm sorry for this stupid doubt....

Kind regards,

Kepler

I was under the impression most asteroids travel in an elliptical orbit and their velocity is not constant at all.

Are you trying to calculate a short part of its journey? That should be fairly simple, basically the length of the curve or sequential curves that make up its path traveled over a given time.

Sincerely,

William McCormick
Logged
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11033
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: How does one calculate velocity when using spherical coordinates?
« Reply #3 on: 26/09/2016 11:27:40 »
Hello, Kepler.... It's been some time since you were last seen - are you a long-period comet?

If it is a known object that approaches the Earth, you can find out about it here:
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/orbits/

A more complete list of known objects (including ones that don't approach the Earth) are cataloged here:
http://minorplanetcenter.net/

You can use some web tools here: https://janus.astro.umd.edu/AW/awtools.html#5a

If you want software you can run yourself, try here:
http://www.projectpluto.com/find_orb.htm#Others
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Re: How does one calculate velocity when using spherical coordinates?
« Reply #4 on: 27/09/2016 11:56:11 »
You can download a very informative PDF covering the subject at the following url.

https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/aeronautics-and-astronautics/16-07-dynamics-fall-2009/lecture-notes/MIT16_07F09_Lec05.pdf
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.937 seconds with 41 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.