0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
s = 0.5 a t^2 where s = distance, a = acceleration and t = time (you did that at school, surely?) Minimum transit distance is probably 10^11 meters. Put a = 20 m/s^2 (a bit more than 2g) then t^2 = 10^10 so t = 10^5 seconds, just over a day.
You don't need to be sarcastic.
Quote from: alancalverd on 28/09/2016 17:54:40s = 0.5 a t^2 where s = distance, a = acceleration and t = time (you did that at school, surely?) Minimum transit distance is probably 10^11 meters. Put a = 20 m/s^2 (a bit more than 2g) then t^2 = 10^10 so t = 10^5 seconds, just over a day.I assume that the OP intended on landing on Mars, not whizzing by it, or creating a new impact crater on its surface...If one wanted to accelerate at 20m/s2 until the half-way point, and then decelerate at the same rate until the destination is reached, then just double the time it takes to get to 5x1010 meters.
Quote from: Semaphore on 28/09/2016 18:04:06You don't need to be sarcastic.True, but it's one of life's rare pleasures for an old man!
Quote from: alancalverd on 28/09/2016 22:06:20Quote from: Semaphore on 28/09/2016 18:04:06You don't need to be sarcastic.True, but it's one of life's rare pleasures for an old man!That doesn't excuse it. I suppose you could have learned manners at school.
I suppose you could have learned manners at school.
So it takes 70711 seconds or 19.6 hours to get to the midway point and a similar time to decelerate, for a total of 1 day and 15 hours.
Perhaps it is related to Elon Musk's recent announcement that SpaceX is planning on sending people to Mars?
You don't need me to identify them.
Quote from: SemaphoreYou don't need me to identify them.You could flag up a few for us!Making silly comments is another "of life's rare pleasures for an old man!".