The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. Is cold plasma treatment effective?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is cold plasma treatment effective?

  • 2 Replies
  • 4249 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thedoc (OP)

  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 21 times
Is cold plasma treatment effective?
« on: 05/12/2016 01:23:02 »
Christine Kretschmann  asked the Naked Scientists:
   Have you ever heard about cold plasma treatment ?

I saw a german documentary about this amazing treatment, which is treament a la star trek.

Scientists  in Germany has  developed a device  which produce a cold plasma (40 c) which is  successful used to heal wounds which are infected by resitent bacterias(where no antibotic can help at the moment).

After two treatments with the plasma the bacteria population is reduced by 40%. The best thing is, for all how are afraid of he dentist, you can used to heal tooth illness, no drilling anymore.

Sadly I could only find only german publication.

http://www.bmbf.de/de/13972.php
http://www.patent-de.com/20071031/DE102006019664A1.html

In any case it is quite interesting, I can't remember a podcast about cold plasma. Have you ever reported about this ?

Kind regards

Christine Kretschmann
What do you think?
« Last Edit: 05/12/2016 01:23:02 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline exothermic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 677
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 36 times
Re: Is cold plasma treatment effective?
« Reply #1 on: 05/12/2016 11:48:16 »
Quote from: Christine Kretschmann
After two treatments with the plasma the bacteria population is reduced by 40%.

The 40% reduction is the mean value out of 14 patients which were treated 5 times for 2 minutes with the argon plasma device.


Quote from: Christine Kretschmann
Sadly I could only find only german publication.

Br J Dermatol. 2012 Aug;167(2):404-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10923.x. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
Isbary G1, Heinlin J, Shimizu T, Zimmermann JL, Morfill G, Schmidt HU, Monetti R, Steffes B, Bunk W, Li Y, Klaempfl T, Karrer S, Landthaler M, Stolz W.

Successful and safe use of 2 min cold atmospheric argon plasma in chronic wounds: results of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND:
The development of antibiotic resistance by microorganisms is an increasing problem in medicine. In chronic wounds, bacterial colonization is associated with impaired healing. Cold atmospheric plasma is an innovative promising tool to deal with these problems.

OBJECTIVES:
The 5-min argon plasma treatment has already demonstrated efficacy in reducing bacterial numbers in chronic infected wounds in vivo. In this study we investigated a 2-min plasma treatment with the same device and the next-generation device, to assess safety and reduction in bacterial load, regardless of the kind of bacteria and their resistance level in chronic wounds.

METHODS:
Twenty-four patients with chronic infected wounds were treated in a prospective randomized controlled phase II study with 2 min of cold atmospheric argon plasma every day: 14 with MicroPlaSter alpha device, 10 with MicroPlaSter beta device (next-generation device) in addition to standard wound care. The patient acted as his/her own control. Bacterial species were detected by standard bacterial swabs and bacterial load by semiquantitative count on nitrocellulose filters. The plasma settings were the same as in the previous phase II study in which wounds were exposed for 5 min to argon plasma.

RESULTS:
Analysis of 70 treatments in 14 patients with the MicroPlaSter alpha device revealed a significant (40%, P<0.016) reduction in bacterial load in plasma-treated wounds, regardless of the species of bacteria. Analysis of 137 treatments in 10 patients with the MicroPlaSter beta device showed a highly significant reduction (23.5%, P<0.008) in bacterial load. No side-effects occurred and the treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS:
A 2-min treatment with either of two cold atmospheric argon plasma devices is a safe, painless and effective technique to decrease the bacterial load in chronic wounds.

© 2012 The Authors. BJD © 2012 British Association of Dermatologists.
PMID: 22385038
Logged
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11035
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Is cold plasma treatment effective?
« Reply #2 on: 06/12/2016 09:25:01 »
Quote from: Christine Kretschmann
the bacteria population is reduced by 40%
Many bacteria can divide in 30-60 minutes.

Does this mean that the bacterial load is back to the starting leval an hour after the treatment?
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.372 seconds with 31 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.