0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Luke Pullsy on 08/12/2016 23:53:42-There's one BIG problem with your post that I feel needs to be addressed.Quote1. You can't take the Bible (Old or New Testament) as a historical account of anything.That is blatantly wrong. The Bible has some mistakes in it and the question of how to interpret it is a BIG question that many 'experts' get wrong, i.e. the birth of Y'shua bar Yosef.You have a very strong negative bias that I assume comes fom you being a dedicated atheist(?) and this bias won't allow you to open-mindedly addess any scientific and historic evidence that would conflict with your dogma. The correct birthdate of April 17, 6 BC / 17.4.748 AUC for the birth of the Jewish Messiah proves much including one element of the GOD=7_4 program/algorithm; see that at http://GOD704.wikia.com . But that really scientifically proves atheism wrong, so...
-
1. You can't take the Bible (Old or New Testament) as a historical account of anything.
Moderators,It was a mistake to have moved this thread to the category 'That CAN'T be true'. This is a lie since Saturday April 17, 6 BC is the true birthdate of Jesus son of Joseph. Your agenda here is quite obvious and is the opposite of good science.
MOD COMMENT: A number of statements have been removed from this thread because they sterotype religious belief
Quote from: Brad Watson on 07/12/2016 23:11:48Seriously? Jesus son of Joseph is the most important figure in history and if it is established that a BIG event in the heavens marked his birth, then that would be a proof of GOD/God-incarnate. Texas sharpshooter fallacy.
Seriously? Jesus son of Joseph is the most important figure in history and if it is established that a BIG event in the heavens marked his birth, then that would be a proof of GOD/God-incarnate.
At that time, superstition was rife.
Anyone born on a date where something "big" happened would have had a head start when claiming to be the son of God, a prophet or whatever.
Your view seems to be completely divorced from science.
I have stated nothing in this forum that's "untrue". Be specific about what was "untrue".
Quote from: Brad Watson on 16/12/2016 14:37:53I have stated nothing in this forum that's "untrue". Be specific about what was "untrue".You stated and implied the untruth that this thread was move by atheist scientists. That is religious stereotyping and untrue in the specific instance. It would be worth checking your facts before making false statements.
This thread will not be moved to the science sections as it is not a scientific question or discussion
however we are happy to move it to Just Chat.
It was not moved here as an insult, but because this section has a higher hit rate than many others and so would receive greater attention, particularly with the contentious title.
Quote from: Colin2B on 16/12/2016 10:21:37MOD COMMENT: A number of statements have been removed from this thread because they sterotype religious beliefThat's false. I have stated nothing in this forum that's "untrue". Be specific about what was "untrue". Others have made false claims and have insulted me. Placing this thread in the subforum 'That CAN'T be true' is a lie in itself. The 'Star of Bethlehem'/Jesus' Birthdate did occur on April 16, 6 BC. Why not do the right thing and move it out of this insulting subforum?