The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Life Sciences
The Environment
How does electronic publication compare with colour-printing in terms of environmental impact?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
How does electronic publication compare with colour-printing in terms of environmental impact?
1 Replies
6109 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
thedoc
(OP)
Forum Admin
Hero Member
510
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 21 times
How does electronic publication compare with colour-printing in terms of environmental impact?
«
on:
15/12/2016 01:53:01 »
Thapelo Ramosana asked the Naked Scientists:
Hi, I would like to know the impact colour printed pages have on the environment, in temrs of the number of trees that would have to be chopped to create a book, e.g Looking at a 35 page double sided printed magazine, as compared to using electronic devises to transmit the same information contained in a magazine, newspaper, brochures, etc?
What do you think?
«
Last Edit: 15/12/2016 01:53:01 by _system
»
Logged
evan_au
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
11033
Activity:
8%
Thanked: 1486 times
Re: How does electronic publication compare with colour-printing in terms of environmental impact?
«
Reply #1 on:
15/01/2017 09:14:11 »
There are a lot of variables here!
- If the glossy magazine ends up in landfill after looking at 50% of the pages, then it is fairly inefficient
- I have heard that a majority of digital photographs taken today are never looked at again. Printing them on glossy paper would be a total waste (as is taking them in the first place!)
- Of the few images that are viewed by other people on social media, digital distribution is more efficient than distributing a 35 page magazine to all the interested parties.
- However, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram etc consume lots of storage and electricity keeping all these rarely-accessed photos accessible within seconds from anywhere in the world.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...