The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology
  4. Has the Chicxulub crater location been moved by plate tectonics?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Has the Chicxulub crater location been moved by plate tectonics?

  • 2 Replies
  • 5846 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kazbert

  • Guest
Has the Chicxulub crater location been moved by plate tectonics?
« on: 27/09/2017 21:44:24 »
The Chicxulub crater formed nearly 66 million years ago. Is it surprising at all that the Chicxulub crater is still round enough today to be recognizable as a crater?  Where was it located before plate tectonics moved it to where it is now?
« Last Edit: 28/09/2017 08:50:31 by chris »
Logged
 



Marked as best answer by on 11/08/2025 05:38:19

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
  • Undo Best Answer
  • Re: Has the Chicxulub crater location been moved by plate tectonics?
    « Reply #1 on: 28/09/2017 08:25:21 »
    Quote from: kazbert on 27/09/2017 21:44:24
    The Chicxulub crater formed nearly 66 million years ago. Is it surprising at all that the Chicxulub crater is still round enough today to be recognizable as a crater?

    Continental-drift shifts the tectonic-plates more than squish them, so the circular-shape will be preserved.

    Quote from: kazbert on 27/09/2017 21:44:24
    Where was it located before plate tectonics moved it to where it is now?



    https://youtu.be/cpiMGXVPulE

    * Chicxulub 66Ma.jpg (94.4 kB, 1280x800 - viewed 6311 times.)
    Logged
     

    kazbert

    • Guest
    Re: Has the Chicxulub crater location been moved by plate tectonics?
    « Reply #2 on: 28/09/2017 22:42:14 »
    Quote from: RD on 28/09/2017 08:25:21
    Continental-drift shifts the tectonic-plates more than squish them, so the circular-shape will be preserved.

    True, but there are notable exceptions.  North America's Rocky Mountain range exists within the North American Plate, not at a plate boundary.  And the Yucatan peninsula exists relatively close to where the Caribbean Plate meets the North American Plate.

    But I suppose that the existence of the approximately round Chixculub Crater means that location it did not see much distortion over the past 66 million years.
    Logged
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags: chicxulub crater  / meteor  / plate tectonics 
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.833 seconds with 29 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.