[guest39538]

No, but at least he had other redeeming qualities like being good at physics.

So do I, it is not my fault that most people in the world do not have the brain power to understand or can even have a good debate about the content provided. I am only about 7 years in, I am sure by another 7 years I will explain it much more simplified for those who do not get it.
If you were as smart as you think you are, then you should be able to answer this very simple question,


How much length is there between your now time and your next now time?

I suggest there is no length it is immediate ahead?

If you would use generally accepted terms people may be able to understand you. As you insist defining things to suit your nutty ideas how do you expect people to understand you?
That said, over 7 years you have been shown to be consistently wrong on a whole range of subjects and to just be seeking attention.

Like I thought, you avoided the question because you know the answer contradicts time dilation and length contraction.

I avoided the question because it makes no sense. It has more in common with Alice in Wonderland than any kind of science.

You are consistent in this though aren't you? Putting a 'question' that makes no sense so you can crow that you are right. Like Zippy in Rainbow.

Your so funny, reminds me of an immigrant getting stopped by the police with the ''I no understand''.   It is a simple question in plane English which we both know destroys time dilation myths.

'your now time and your next now time' is Lewis Carol humpty dumpty language. But hats off to you for incorporating border line racism into your last reply.

I was wondering what 'plane English' is? Is it what pilots use to communicate?

Have you never watched Uk customs programs or police programs?  There is no racism in the truth.

Anyway I assume you know what a chronological position is!

I want you to start at 0, what length away is your next chronological position?

Why don't you tell us all how you define a 'chronological position' pigeon?

If we are using birds for analogies can I call you cxxk?

I look nothing like a pigeon I assure you.

I use the exact same definition of chronological as everyone else .

Chronology (from Latin chronologia, from Ancient Greek χρόνος, chrónos, "time"; and -λογία, -logia) is the science of arranging events in their order of occurrence in time. Consider, for example, the use of a timeline or sequence of events. It is also "the determination of the actual temporal sequence of past events".

So if an event chronologically happens now, what amount of time until the next chronological  event?

What length on the time line is there?

Events in chronological order on a time line are continuous,  a line is adjoined.

You can not pass 0 without leaving a past position on the chronological line.

[The Spoon]

No, but at least he had other redeeming qualities like being good at physics.

So do I, it is not my fault that most people in the world do not have the brain power to understand or can even have a good debate about the content provided. I am only about 7 years in, I am sure by another 7 years I will explain it much more simplified for those who do not get it.
If you were as smart as you think you are, then you should be able to answer this very simple question,


How much length is there between your now time and your next now time?

I suggest there is no length it is immediate ahead?

If you would use generally accepted terms people may be able to understand you. As you insist defining things to suit your nutty ideas how do you expect people to understand you?
That said, over 7 years you have been shown to be consistently wrong on a whole range of subjects and to just be seeking attention.

Like I thought, you avoided the question because you know the answer contradicts time dilation and length contraction.

I avoided the question because it makes no sense. It has more in common with Alice in Wonderland than any kind of science.

You are consistent in this though aren't you? Putting a 'question' that makes no sense so you can crow that you are right. Like Zippy in Rainbow.

Your so funny, reminds me of an immigrant getting stopped by the police with the ''I no understand''.   It is a simple question in plane English which we both know destroys time dilation myths.

'your now time and your next now time' is Lewis Carol humpty dumpty language. But hats off to you for incorporating border line racism into your last reply.

I was wondering what 'plane English' is? Is it what pilots use to communicate?

Have you never watched Uk customs programs or police programs?  There is no racism in the truth.

Anyway I assume you know what a chronological position is!

I want you to start at 0, what length away is your next chronological position?

Why don't you tell us all how you define a 'chronological position' pigeon?

If we are using birds for analogies can I call you cxxk?

I look nothing like a pigeon I assure you.

I use the exact same definition of chronological as everyone else .

Chronology (from Latin chronologia, from Ancient Greek χρόνος, chrónos, "time"; and -λογία, -logia) is the science of arranging events in their order of occurrence in time. Consider, for example, the use of a timeline or sequence of events. It is also "the determination of the actual temporal sequence of past events".

So if an event chronologically happens now, what amount of time until the next chronological  event?

What length on the time line is there?

Events in chronological order on a time line are continuous,  a line is adjoined.

You can not pass 0 without leaving a past position on the chronological line.

I know what chronology is you buffoon. What I am calling in to question is your term 'chronological position'. Not in common usage. It appears to be another thing you have chosen to define to suit yourself.
'I want you to start at 0, what length away is your next chronological position?' is nonsense - even by your standards.

I dont mind you calling me a cock - I will wear the sobriquet with pride. I believe it refers to the male bird which has generally more beautiful plumage. The pigeon on the other hand is considered winged vermin that struts around pecking at the ground. Also, in my original naming of you it refers to one who knocks over the chess pieces and shits all over the board.

[guest39538]

.

I dont mind you calling me a cock - I will wear the sobriquet with pride. I believe it refers to the male bird which has generally more beautiful plumage. The pigeon on the other hand is considered winged vermin that struts around pecking at the ground. Also, in my original naming of you it refers to one who knocks over the chess pieces and shits all over the board.

Ahah , quality , you got my respect for that one.

If you have a time line you have different positions on that time line yes?

[alancalverd]

Come on, children. If you start at x, your next position is x+ Δx.

If x is a continuous variable, then this is true for ∀(x) as Δx → 0.

Now please get on with the game before I show you both a yellow card. And don't argue with the referee.

[guest39538]

Come on, children. If you start at x, your next position is x+ Δx.

If x is a continuous variable, then this is true for ∀(x) as Δx → 0.

Now please get on with the game before I show you both a yellow card. And don't argue with the referee.

What does the upside down (A) mean Alan please?

Added- and your maths looks good to me, I think your maths says that if t=x then it takes 0 length to change when it is a continuous variable?

Agreeing with me?