[jonbyrer (OP)]

Matter cannot be destroyed. Only transformed.
Empty space cannot be destroyed. Only displaced.
Compacted or trapped space within an atom cannot be destroyed only released or displaced.

When atomic matter, light, or gas enters a black hole, the energy and space that gives an atom three dimensions is compress by hypergravity.  The atomic particles lose their vibration and charge which defines them. The particles in the black hole lay down into a two dimensional disk shape or a large 2D super particle or Dark Matter.  The resulting action of the atomic deconstruction within a black hole is a release in every direction of highly compressed space that freely exits the black hole at either end or Dark Energy. This release of empty space creates different layers of space that push back on gas, planets, and stars within a galaxy. The releasing of space from matter is best described as “Atomic Spatial Displacement” or “Dark Energy”.  This atomic release of space creates layers of space which surround the galaxy creating a enormous space bubble that can be seen with spacebase telescopes.  The effect is known as gravitational lensing.  This is a result of looking out and through our own galaxy's space layer or giant space bubble.  The bubble or mushroom shaped release of layered space on each end of a black hole is dark energy.  Along with this dark energy, the laws of angular motion forms the stars, planets, and gases into a disk shape.  Imagine a snow globe with a flat disk in the center.

[guest39538]

Empty space cannot be destroyed. Only displaced.

Shall we start with this notion? 

Empty space would be relatively made of nothing, how can you displace nothing?

[jonbyrer (OP)]

Thanks for the reply.  I am using the words "empty space" because I am not sure the correct term for it. I am trying to describe what is released from an atom when it is deconstructed inside a blackhole - The compressed space that is held within an atom.   

[guest39538]

Thanks for the reply.  I am using the words "empty space" because I am not sure the correct term for it. I am trying to describe what is released from an atom when it is deconstructed inside a blackhole - The compressed space that is held within an atom.   

Well, when an atom is formed I like to think it is space-time and it emits space-time.  When it ''deconstructs'' I like to imagine  the energy just simply disperses at c proportional to the inverse square law. I also like to consider the Bh is also space-time , formed from the space-time expansion.

Now I have no objection if you want to say space-time  displacement.  You can consider this to be a ''solid'' that is not solid in a sense, inside of a football (The Bh). 

If you were to part/displace space-time , you would leave a void of space between field lines/space-time.

Does this help ?

If not emphasise please so we can continue.

[jonbyrer (OP)]

Thanks for the reply.  I am using the words "empty space" because I am not sure the correct term for it. I am trying to describe what is released from an atom when it is deconstructed inside a blackhole - The compressed space that is held within an atom.   

Well, when an atom is formed I like to think it is space-time and it emits space-time.  When it ''deconstructs'' I like to imagine  the energy just simply disperses at c proportional to the inverse square law. I also like to consider the Bh is also space-time , formed from the space-time expansion.

Now I have no objection if you want to say space-time  displacement.  You can consider this to be a ''solid'' that is not solid in a sense, inside of a football (The Bh). 

If you were to part/displace space-time , you would leave a void of space between field lines/space-time.

Does this help ?

If not emphasise please so we can continue.

Yes,  only I think 'pure space' would describe what I am thinking of.  Time does not exist in atoms or in space. It is only our way to describe what we perceive as "now." I would describe 'space-time' as, speed at which light travels through space. Pure Space is a wave or frequency, the highest vibrating with lowest force.  Gravity is also a wave the lowest frequency or lowest vibrating highest force, capable of trapping light.  When gravity becomes so strong at the center of a black hole it take away the three dimensional properties of atomic matter, particles and electrons become flattened or deconstructed into a 2/D state or singularity ‘Dark Matter’.  The space that was compressed with in the atoms is then released at either end of a galaxy.  Holding the galaxy in a disked shape. This release of pure space or ‘Dark Energy’ is what is contributing to the ever expanding universe. 

[guest39538]

Time does not exist in atoms or in space

I agree time does not exist in ''pure space'' because space  has no change mechanism.   However , atoms have a mechanism for change and they either exist or they don't exist. 

Do you not think ,that time although a moment of now's, could be considered the duration of existence of an atom ?

[jonbyrer (OP)]

Time does not exist in atoms or in space

I agree time does not exist in ''pure space'' because space  has no change mechanism.   However , atoms have a mechanism for change and they either exist or they don't exist. 

Do you not think ,that time although a moment of now's, could be considered the duration of existence of an atom ?

On the atomic level the layers of space or (time) can be seen when an atoms electrons are observed jumping from place to place along their path.  Like the pages of a book the layers of space have two sides when the electron of an atom crosses from one side of a layer of space to the other it appears to be jumping on its orbit or path.  The electron is moving from one side of the layer of space to the other side of our observable layer of space, or ‘Now’.

[Colin2B]

  However , atoms have a mechanism for change and they either exist or they don't exist. 

Quite right, they wouldn’t decay otherwise.

[guest39538]

  However , atoms have a mechanism for change and they either exist or they don't exist. 

Quite right, they wouldn’t decay otherwise.

I assume atomic decay   is also a variable relative to enphalpic ''conditions'' and/or atomic field densities?

[jonbyrer (OP)]

  However , atoms have a mechanism for change and they either exist or they don't exist. 

Quite right, they wouldn’t decay otherwise.

I assume atomic decay   is also a variable relative to enphalpic ''conditions'' and/or atomic field densities?

Yes.   Enthalpy is what I am trying to describe.  Thank you