[guest39538]

If X₁  =  1/10

and

= 7/10

Then



Is more likely to be

Z₁  <  Y₁




QBS.jpg (304.59 kB . 4496x2944 - viewed 2026 times)

Typical me, I stuffed the drawing math up it suppose to say :

(0-1) + (0+1) = 0

equilibrium -1+1-1+1.........consider a sea sore

  It creates a standalone wave


see.jpg (285.29 kB . 4496x2944 - viewed 2033 times)

This give the result of

P = 1

Because there is ''no down'' in my model, there is only 0 and + because - becomes nullified by + in the standalone wave of equilibrium.

Well?  What do you think ?

Poker forums everywhere banned me for this , why did they ban me?  They fear me and my idea.

Here is a link to one that banned me years ago, I didn't have all the idea and answer back then though .

https://www.pokerstarsschool.com/forum/support-area/poker-news/41322-the-roulette-principle

My model makes it , so that any gambling becomes a ''game of skill''  and becomes +Ev over time compared to -Ev for most in gambling. 

Added- I can sense people laughing behind my back , mocking me, if anyone with software design knowledge is reading this and wants to help me free for now, 25% share on offer when we go to sales.

So time now Tn= £0.00

Time after Ta = 25%

[guest39538]

In a vast ocean of knowledge, Dirac created a Dirac sea and a negative energy.  Negative energy has an opposite in being positive energy.  The universe is balanced on negative and positive energy,  no dissimilar to negative and positive outcomes of events.  Again this is a situation where  the use of A and B becomes the final solution. 
Thus said , one contrives to better their chances by covering more ''corners'' of the ''universe'' by betting on more than one sequence of events ,  covering various possibilities to find a value range.  However how true is this range unless we consider a total opposite outcome to the expected ?
What I mean by this is when ten reds come out in a row on a roulette table, our instinct is to go black, but what if we could bring ourselves to bet red against the going ''odds''?   You must of seen this where we bet black , but another ten reds come out and break our ''bank'' ?
So you see, variation is just about thought and numbers can only be negative or positive or run  in reverse,  ace-ace is about 82% favorite in a game of poker, if we could avoid the 18% of the time , the aces would never lose.
So you see, I know an awful lot about variance and randomness, I will work it out one day for sure.  I already  ''cracked'' poker, ''your'' next.....Roulette has boundaries and limitations, finite random can be worked out to a degree of accuracy with careful consideration.

P.s In the next several weeks I will perfect my notions, have a paper wrote, when my notion starts to work, the 25% offer will go down to 5%.  You will have missed the boat.

P.s I have thought of a name for my app, The Overtunity.

[guest39538]

Well it looks like my idea as failed, I think I might have got lucky on a lucky dip though, for 3 numbers,  but I spent £36 on tickets , I couldn't afford to lose , what a dk.    . 

[Bored chemist]

There was never a calculation to check.

[guest39538]

There was never a calculation to check.

You don't need numbers to calculate something, look at shapes .  It is not called a shape because of measurement, it is about the form.  But never mind Mr C, I have had enough of science now.   Kids break up tomorrow from school, I intend on spending lots of time with them , enough games for me ,  I am just stupid ....and don't forget , nonsense.

[guest39538]

In a vast ocean of knowledge, Dirac created a Dirac sea and a negative energy.  Negative energy has an opposite in being positive energy.  The universe is balanced on negative and positive energy,  no dissimilar to negative and positive outcomes of events.  Again this is a situation where  the use of A and B becomes the final solution. 
Thus said , one contrives to better their chances by covering more ''corners'' of the ''universe'' by betting on more than one sequence of events ,  covering various possibilities to find a value range.  However how true is this range unless we consider a total opposite outcome to the expected ?
What I mean by this is when ten reds come out in a row on a roulette table, our instinct is to go black, but what if we could bring ourselves to bet red against the going ''odds''?   You must of seen this where we bet black , but another ten reds come out and break our ''bank'' ?
So you see, variation is just about thought and numbers can only be negative or positive or run  in reverse,  ace-ace is about 82% favorite in a game of poker, if we could avoid the 18% of the time , the aces would never lose.
So you see, I know an awful lot about variance and randomness, I will work it out one day for sure.  I already  ''cracked'' poker, ''your'' next.....Roulette has boundaries and limitations, finite random can be worked out to a degree of accuracy with careful consideration.

P.s In the next several weeks I will perfect my notions, have a paper wrote, when my notion starts to work, the 25% offer will go down to 5%.  You will have missed the boat.

P.s I have thought of a name for my app, The Overtunity.

Nobody got any opposite opinions about my overtunity analysis  ?

added- What a plonker, it is over-unity not overtunity. 

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/over-unity

The world as not a clue how variance works, probability are sh1t and are not worth the time calculating, it is meaningless and nonsense.  I need to write a continuation law to account for reverses and continuation in a variate system to cover the comparison of say 20 reds in a row.

In my lotto attempt I never accounted for what I call a ''pole switch'' where I should of been brave enough to bet red again instead of switching to black. You know the one, its got to be black , its got to be black, then red comes out .