The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. How strong is electronegativity?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How strong is electronegativity?

  • 1 Replies
  • 1668 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DLRRob (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 5
  • Activity:
    0%
How strong is electronegativity?
« on: 28/11/2018 21:15:37 »
Gravity compared to its other fellow nuclear forces is primarily considered as a weak force (until you get to the combined effects within a large body) with a long ranged affect. Unlike the strong nuclear force which is necessary in holding together particles and sub atomic particles in the very near range via its force carrier, gluons. The electromagnetic force is also noted for its long range and lastly the weak nuclear forces to bring about structural changes in the atoms due to instability.
Magnetic fields have shown obvious effects with certain elements at limited levels of success in materials with particular structures and in addition with electric magnets the field strength can be altered by the amount of charge passing through it. However Gravity works with all normal matter which makes me wonder what is going on in all these forms of matter. My feeling is that it may be the electronegativity charge in both the sub atomic particles and particles, small that it is. This tiny imbalanced electromagnetic force in all matter which acts to bring matter together makes me wonder if it could be Gravity. Bringing particles together and then moving atoms together so that they link and pair successfully in the same way that two magnets may align. Gravity and the electromagnetic force both exhibit the same long range only that gravity is far weaker. 
Could it be tested by surrounding a body in a broad set of collective frequencies bearing in mind the following, wave strengths, heat energy and the total mass of the local large object set to either counter those frequencies and wave amplitudes in the surrounding local matter electronegativity waves or by opposing those waves created by the body? A similar test could be to set up with an emitter to produce this broad set of frequencies and strengths in hope that it would attract a non-magnetic substance.
I would appreciate any insight into this question.
Thank you.
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: How strong is electronegativity?
« Reply #1 on: 28/11/2018 21:38:40 »
What do you think electronegativity is?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.108 seconds with 28 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.