The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution
  4. How do dogs compare genetically to wolves?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How do dogs compare genetically to wolves?

  • 2 Replies
  • 142960 Views
  • 7 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline nudephil (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ********
  • 261
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Naked Scientists Producer
How do dogs compare genetically to wolves?
« on: 10/01/2020 14:00:16 »
Donald asks via the webform:

Since dogs evolved from wolves, how do they compare genetically? Do they have the same number of chromosomes? Do they share a high percentage of genes, or do they have exactly the same genes, but different variants of those same genes? How does this difference compare to the difference between humans and neanderthals?

Any insights? In Naked Genetics we covered a little of this. It's my understanding that they have the same number of chromosomes and share most genes.
Logged
 



Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3743
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 531 times
Re: How do dogs compare genetically to wolves?
« Reply #1 on: 10/01/2020 17:46:38 »
One thing I learned recently (who knows if it is true--I have provided some refs) is that dogs may be similar to wolves with a mutation associated with Williams Syndrome (which in humans typically results in friendly, outgoing, and trusting personalities, along with some minor learning disabilities and structural differences.

https://www.insidescience.org/news/rare-human-syndrome-may-explain-why-dogs-are-so-friendly
https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700398
Logged
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11033
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: How do dogs compare genetically to wolves?
« Reply #2 on: 10/01/2020 21:56:05 »
Quote from: OP
do they have exactly the same genes, but different variants of those same genes?
Dogs have more copies of genes for processing carbohydrates than wolves, and variants that process this more efficiently.

The hypothesis is that wolves started hanging around humans, and scavenging on human garbage heaps. Those that could process human left-over carbs more efficiently thrived better than the rest.
See: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2013-jan-23-la-sci-how-dogs-evolved-20130124-story.html
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: genes  / genetics  / dna  / dogs  / wolves  / chromosomes  / genome 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.302 seconds with 30 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.