The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Is there any truth to the Solfeggio frequency scale?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is there any truth to the Solfeggio frequency scale?

  • 1 Replies
  • 3312 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline amalia (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 48
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Is there any truth to the Solfeggio frequency scale?
« on: 08/11/2019 11:43:48 »
Justin wrote to us to know more about this:
Is there any truth in this Solfeggio scale thing that I read about? Some frequency like 528 can make you go from sad to happy or is this whole thing more like hypnosis?
Can you help?
Logged
 



Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: Is there any truth to the Solfeggio frequency scale?
« Reply #1 on: 08/11/2019 13:20:46 »
Quote from: amalia on 08/11/2019 11:43:48
Justin wrote to us to know more about this:
Is there any truth in this Solfeggio scale thing that I read about? Some frequency like 528 can make you go from sad to happy or is this whole thing more like hypnosis?
Can you help?
The Solfeggio scale (from which we get Solfa - doh a deer etc) was an early musical 6 tone scale used for Gregorian Chants. Today it is called Just Intonation.
It is based on the natural Pythagorean scale which uses ratios of natural harmonics so it is one which matches the natural resonances of objects like pipes, strings etc, so it is very pleasing to the ear and is one which we naturally sing. Note here I am talking about the relationship between notes and not their actual frequencies, a natural scale can start on any frequency and there is no reason to think that any one is better than any other, especially since the length of the ear canal and cochlea differ between people. So, relative frequencies are important, not specific ones.
Very early music was very limited, usually to unison, perfect 4th, 5th and octave, because changing key was not possible due to the physics of the Pythagorean scale. The introduction of the equal temperament scale allows many more musical possibilities and has enriched our music, but it comes at a cost in that some of the notes - mainly 3rd and 4th - are slightly out of tune.
Singers and unfretted string instruments can play a just scale (so violin can accompany a singer singing a just scale), but a piano can’t play a just scale. So your best bet for hearing a natural scale (which the voice tends towards) is folk songs fiddle accompanied, Gregorian Chant, or  a cappella groups eg Barbershop quartets. I would recommend listening to some as it is very pleasing to the ear. But it has nothing to do with specific ‘magical’ frequencies, that’s just hokum.

Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: solfeggio  / frequency scale  / mood 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.163 seconds with 28 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.