The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. 3 objects and 2 forces to destroy the energy
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

3 objects and 2 forces to destroy the energy

  • 21 Replies
  • 6674 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LB7 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 454
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Ludovic Bavay Ubeda
Re: 3 objects and 2 forces to destroy the energy
« Reply #20 on: 30/05/2020 14:36:55 »
I updated the program of the numerical integration:


* bsge.png (101.95 kB . 567x847 - viewed 1751 times)
Logged
Ludovic Bavay 19011971 Valenciennes
 



Offline LB7 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 454
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Ludovic Bavay Ubeda
Re: 3 objects and 2 forces to destroy the energy
« Reply #21 on: 04/06/2020 17:16:45 »
The forces can be draw like that:


* vs63.png (50.53 kB . 899x752 - viewed 1625 times)

I have a torque with F1 around A0  on the red wall, that torque gives the energy : watom+=Ratom*(a2-a1); with Ratom the radius of the needle. watom is very small compared to the energy wcircle less wredwall. The energy from F4 is exactly the energy needed for F3.

And the numerical integral is:


* bgznn.png (108.89 kB . 714x853 - viewed 1531 times)

I didn't multiply with k the results because the precision of the long double is 18 decimal digit and when I multiply with 1e10 I add some bad random digits.


* bgjq.png (12.09 kB . 871x71 - viewed 1625 times)

More the needle is bigger more the difference of energy is smaller.


* uj2.png (130.43 kB . 738x841 - viewed 1517 times)

* vfyt.png (109.87 kB, 711x849 - viewed 248 times.)
« Last Edit: 05/06/2020 22:39:30 by LB7 »
Logged
Ludovic Bavay 19011971 Valenciennes
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.998 seconds with 29 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.