The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. Could Neuralink adopt this approach?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Could Neuralink adopt this approach?

  • 2 Replies
  • 2230 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gravitymall (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 3
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Could Neuralink adopt this approach?
« on: 28/07/2020 21:12:49 »
A quote from an article titled: "Ultra-low power brain implants find meaningful signal in grey matter noise" that reduces the power of neural interfaces.

"By tuning into a subset of brain waves, University of Michigan researchers have dramatically reduced the power requirements of neural interfaces while improving their accuracy—a discovery that could lead to long-lasting brain implants that can both treat neurological diseases and enable mind-controlled prosthetics and machines.

The team, led by Cynthia Chestek, associate professor of biomedical engineering and core faculty at the Robotics Institute, estimated a 90% drop in power consumption of neural interfaces by utilizing their approach."
Logged
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11035
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Could Neuralink adopt this approach?
« Reply #1 on: 28/07/2020 21:24:10 »
Sure - if you are looking for delta waves with a frequency band of 1-4Hz, then having a sensor that accurately plots the potential of nerve spikes every 1ms is going to waste a lot of power.

Your measurement system must be fit for purpose - in this case, it must be optimized for the type signals it is monitoring, and the constraints of power supply and available communication channels (having wires coming out of someone's scalp is a bacterial invitation to a brain infection).
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_oscillation#Overview
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21166
  • Activity:
    63.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Could Neuralink adopt this approach?
« Reply #2 on: 28/07/2020 23:18:29 »
Depends on how you interpret "tuning in to brain waves". There are some fun radio receivers that select the "wanted" frequency and use all the other electromagnetic noise coming down the aerial to power an amplifier. So according to the description, these implants could be using the remainder of the brain electrical activity to power a detector that selectively amplifies one particular frequency.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.384 seconds with 31 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.