The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Is Stern-Gerlach experiment a proper idealization of measurnment?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is Stern-Gerlach experiment a proper idealization of measurnment?

  • 0 Replies
  • 1842 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jarek Duda (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 169
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/
Is Stern-Gerlach experiment a proper idealization of measurnment?
« on: 18/10/2020 08:33:43 »
I have met statements that Stern-Gerlach experiment can be seen as idealization of quantum measurement: we start with random direction of spin (continuous), end with parallel or anti-parallel alignment (discrete).

Is it a proper analogy/idealization of measurement? How to characterize the differences?
Are there some interesting different analogies?

In Stern-Gerlach we have magnetic dipole traveling in external magnetic field, what means torque (tau = mu x B) hence precession - additional energy e.g. kinetic ... unless parallel or anti-parallel alignement (tau=0), so can it be seen as radiation of excessive energy like for atom deexcitation?

ps. Recent "Tracking the Dynamics of an Ideal Quantum Measurement" https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.080401
« Last Edit: 18/10/2020 08:35:52 by Jarek Duda »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.509 seconds with 28 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.