The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Why is evolution considered a theory?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why is evolution considered a theory?

  • 5 Replies
  • 2726 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline podcastmaker (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 12
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Why is evolution considered a theory?
« on: 14/10/2020 12:49:00 »
Why is evolution considered a theory?
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Why is evolution considered a theory?
« Reply #1 on: 14/10/2020 12:51:59 »
Because that's what it is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline wolfekeeper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1678
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 79 times
Re: Why is evolution considered a theory?
« Reply #2 on: 09/12/2020 21:36:31 »
Because it's only a theory. Like gravity.
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21135
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Why is evolution considered a theory?
« Reply #3 on: 09/12/2020 23:50:00 »
It isn't. It is an everyday observation.

You don't (can't!) look like both of your parents. Your children will probably look even less like them.Your family has evolved. It is an inescapable consequence of sexual reproduction. The mechanism is all bound up with the plasticity of DNA. Living things that reproduce asexually still have some inherent DNA plasticity but with fewer input variables.

Evolution to fill an environmental niche has been observed where a species has changed color, size or shape over a few generations when an environment has changed. Evolution by selective predation has also been observed, "samurai crabs" being a particularly fine example. Obviously these observations tend to be confined to species with short life cycles but there is no reason to suspect that the capability does not extend to trees and large mammals. Interestingly, humans may not be subject to further significant evolution as we tend to normalise our environment (through agriculture and architecture) rather than adapt to it. We also have an exceptional tendency and ability to maintain the weak, eliminate endemic disease,  and grant reproductive rights to all, so "survival of the fittest" does not apply and the species will become more diverse over time.   

"Evolution of species" doesn't quite fit into the category of theory or observation as the term "species" is not consistently defined, and seems if anything to be a consequence of environment-driven selection.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Why is evolution considered a theory?
« Reply #4 on: 10/12/2020 12:35:56 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 09/12/2020 23:50:00
You don't (can't!) look like both of your parents. Your children will probably look even less like them.Your family has evolved.
I look quite a bit like my parents.
Indeed, if offspring didn't inherit traits from them evolution wouldn't work.
If the Samurai crabs didn't have children that looked "like them", the trait would be lost.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21135
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Why is evolution considered a theory?
« Reply #5 on: 10/12/2020 14:39:04 »
The missing word is "exactly". And even without it, you can't possibly look like both of them unless they are identical twin hermaphrodites. Perhaps incestuous earthworms don't evolve, but this thread isn't about diehard Republicans.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.173 seconds with 41 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.