The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Does the complex constant (i) represent a ratio of special reciprocity?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Does the complex constant (i) represent a ratio of special reciprocity?

  • 3 Replies
  • 1953 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Richard777 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 191
  • Activity:
    0%
Does the complex constant (i) represent a ratio of special reciprocity?
« on: 28/12/2020 17:26:25 »
Two forces are reciprocal. Reciprocation requires three conditions:
-   the forces act upon a common particle
-   have equal strength
-   act in opposite directions
Force may be represented as a vector. A 3D force vector may represent “instantaneous force”.
Reciprocal forces may be represented as “reciprocal vectors”.
Polar co-ordinates of force: Fr, θ, φ
Special reciprocation requires one additional rule: φ = θ’ = ½π - θ
Does the result of this condition represent the complex constant (i) as a ratio of force components?
The math is attached.
* 41 Special Reciprocation.pdf (155.54 kB - downloaded 131 times.)
Logged
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11033
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Does the complex constant (i) represent a ratio of special reciprocity?
« Reply #1 on: 28/12/2020 21:16:06 »
Quote from: OP
the forces act upon a common particle, have equal strength, act in opposite directions...
Does the result of this condition represent the complex constant (i) as a ratio of force components?
If you are looking at forces which directly oppose one another (ie their directions are 180° apart), then you can set up the problem as a 1-dimensional problem. You can then solve it with negative numbers, rather than complex numbers.
- You add the two forces (one of which is negative), and you come up with an answer (which may be positive or negative)

If, however, you are working with forces that operate in 2 dimensions (eg North-East and West, for example), then you need more than just negative numbers.
- As you say, you could use complex numbers. You add the two forces (at least one of one of which contains i), and you come up with an answer (which may be positive or negative, and may or may not contain i)
- Equivalently, you could break down the forces into x and y components (using sine & cosine), then you add the horizontal and vertical components separately. You come up with an answer (which may be positive or negative in the x component, and may or may not be zero in the y component)
- So, solving this problem using i is entirely optional. Solutions without i are equally feasible.

Quote from: attachment
Fn = Fnxin + Fnyjn + Fnzkn
The attachment uses 3-dirmensional arithmetic, expressed in i, j and k.
These numbers are called Quaternions in 4 dimensions, in some ways a superset of imaginary numbers (in 2 dimensions), which is a superset of real numbers (positive and negative, in 1 dimension).

Like imaginary numbers, where i*i = -1, in Quaternions, i*i = j*j = k*k = -1

But if the forces are in opposite directions, you can solve it in 1 dimension. Don't make it harder for yourself than it needs to be.

It is true that Quaternions have been used in 3-dimensional computer graphics. As I understand it, the calculations are slightly more complex than processing the equivalent vectors of x, y and z components, so in practice, Quaternions are rarely used in computer graphics.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion

Quote
Two forces are reciprocal.
Editorial comment: I think you may be using the wrong word here,
- The definition of a reciprocal is that if b is the reciprocal of a, then a*b = 1 (eg the reciprocal of 2 is 1/2 = 0.5. 2*0.5 = 1)
        - This uses the Multiplicative inverse. Reciprocals involve division and multiplication
        - This is not the situation you are describing
- What you are talking about here is an opposing force, and forces add.
         - This uses the Additive inverse. Negation involves adding and subtraction..
See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplicative_inverse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Additive_inverse

Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21157
  • Activity:
    71.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Does the complex constant (i) represent a ratio of special reciprocity?
« Reply #2 on: 28/12/2020 23:26:44 »
"Reciprocal X" is used in navigation to signify X ± 180°, whichever value lies between 0 and 360, i.e. the opposite direction. Same as "reciprocating engine". This may be the source of confusion.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11033
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Does the complex constant (i) represent a ratio of special reciprocity?
« Reply #3 on: 30/12/2020 21:02:49 »
Quote from: OP
Does the complex constant (i) represent a ratio of special reciprocity?
No. Multiplying by i is equivalent to a rotation by 90° in the complex plane.
To rotate by 180°, you need to multiply by -1=i*i (since 180° = 2 rotations of 90°).

Multiplying by i is also equivalent to a rotation by 90° in quaternion 4D space, but like I said, why make it more complex than you need to?.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.309 seconds with 33 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.