The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. The Environment
  4. Should we tax products based on how biodegradable the materials are?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Should we tax products based on how biodegradable the materials are?

  • 5 Replies
  • 3260 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EvaH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ********
  • 271
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Should we tax products based on how biodegradable the materials are?
« on: 15/04/2021 15:10:06 »
Ranjith asks:

If we know the quantity of and length of time materials biodegrade in everyday products should they be taxed accordingly?
Wouldn't this encourage develop investment into more biodegradable materials?
Perhaps this would make the UK more of a world leader in such tech, and so would profitable in the medium to long term?


What do you think?
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21139
  • Activity:
    70.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Should we tax products based on how biodegradable the materials are?
« Reply #1 on: 15/04/2021 18:21:27 »
The most biodegradable stuff is food, most of which is not taxed, and paper, which is not taxed if printed.

The problem with widespread use of biodegradables is that they degrade. If your computer fell to bits in a year, you'd have to make another one, thus wasting energy and materials.  Cotton, wool and leather are compostable, so comfortable everyday clothing is OK, but I wouldn't be happy with a wet suit or a hard hat that couldn't be trusted in the sun and rain. 

I'd prefer to encourage longevity and recyclability.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Should we tax products based on how biodegradable the materials are?
« Reply #2 on: 17/04/2021 11:17:38 »
Quote from: EvaH on 15/04/2021 15:10:06
Ranjith asks:

If we know the quantity of and length of time materials biodegrade in everyday products should they be taxed accordingly?
Wouldn't this encourage develop investment into more biodegradable materials?
Perhaps this would make the UK more of a world leader in such tech, and so would profitable in the medium to long term?


What do you think?
It's an idea  but it not redress the balance between the cost of glass and metal and plastic cellophane etc, it will just increaced the use of plastic as it is cheaper. In the first place. Not much is biodegradable as it tends to biodegrade, steel cans are about as close as you get and may add considerably to transportation pollution, bags of crisps would be quite a bit heavier for example.

Realistically implementing such things will be difficult without an agreement with at least European reach. Not science, politics! Aluminium could replace much plastic

Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Should we tax products based on how biodegradable the materials are?
« Reply #3 on: 17/04/2021 12:56:27 »
Fresh cut flowers are about as biodegradable as anything can be, but if they were grown in Africa using water that could have been used to grow food, and then flown to Europe to be sold, they are about as environmentally malevolent as you can get.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21139
  • Activity:
    70.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Should we tax products based on how biodegradable the materials are?
« Reply #4 on: 17/04/2021 14:17:39 »
But economically essential to the grower and seller.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline femaleminer

  • First timers
  • *
  • 6
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Should we tax products based on how biodegradable the materials are?
« Reply #5 on: 18/04/2021 15:37:44 »
We absolutely should tax so much more. Every rope which looses plastic while washing, every fruit or vegetable which could not be planted ecological schould be much more expensive. We should tax everything what destroies our planet, right? Now we can loose money but looking forward to the future otherwise we will loose life.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: biodegradable  / sustainability 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.219 seconds with 39 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.