The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Just Chat!
  4. A lot of us use "Exponentially" when it should really be "Quadratically"!
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

A lot of us use "Exponentially" when it should really be "Quadratically"!

  • 5 Replies
  • 5160 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Curious Cat (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 38
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 33 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
A lot of us use "Exponentially" when it should really be "Quadratically"!
« on: 30/09/2021 10:47:23 »
.
« Last Edit: 02/10/2021 19:21:34 by Curious Cat »
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31103
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: A lot us use "Exponentially" when it should really be "Quadratically"!
« Reply #1 on: 30/09/2021 13:36:32 »
Quote from: Furious Cat on 30/09/2021 13:22:29
Really?
When was the last time U saw quadratic/al/ly? I can't remember.
All I can remember is nonlinear and exponential/ly.
Well, there's a stack of references to the inverse square law.
Most functions aren't quadratic.
Plenty of things - notably economic and microbiological growth are roughly exponential.
So, you see exponential used a lot, because it's often the right word (and often "figuratively" the right word).
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21167
  • Activity:
    60.5%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: A lot us use "Exponentially" when it should really be "Quadratically"!
« Reply #2 on: 30/09/2021 14:36:41 »
Journalists and politicians now use exponential to mean rapid, but they are not "us".
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31103
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: A lot us use "Exponentially" when it should really be "Quadratically"!
« Reply #3 on: 30/09/2021 17:54:26 »
Roughly speaking...
For any given shape, the area varies as the square of the height.
Computing power rises exponentially with time.
The cost of a given amount of computing power falls exponentially with time.
Current varies with the reciprocal. of resistance.
The typical instructions for time taken roasting meat are a linear, but not proportional function of time, but it's not proportional, because there's an offset.
20 minutes per pound  + 20 minutes.

And some are just plain silly.

* heat cap eqn.png (13.31 kB . 787x247 - viewed 2146 times)
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21167
  • Activity:
    60.5%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: A lot of us use "Exponentially" when it should really be "Quadratically"!
« Reply #4 on: 30/09/2021 23:18:30 »
....which brings in the concept of hyperbolic expansion.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31103
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: A lot of us use "Exponentially" when it should really be "Quadratically"!
« Reply #5 on: 01/10/2021 08:56:14 »
I missed "factorially" off the list.
It's one of the few simple mathematical functions that rises faster than exponentially.
Among other things, it's the expression for the number of ways you can randomly assign n different letters to n addressed envelopes.
It is therefore, in some ways, the answer to "How many ways can things go wrong?".
You might have guessed that would rise quickly.
:-)

It's also interesting to see what that weird  equation I cited earlier is actually trying to model.
Here's the (measured) heat capacity of nitrogen vs temperature (K).
As you can see, to a reasonable precision, it is about 1.2


* N2 heat cap.png (13.36 kB . 748x549 - viewed 2053 times)
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: math/s  / physics 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.344 seconds with 42 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.