The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Chemistry
  4. Why is Armstrong's mixture so sensitive?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why is Armstrong's mixture so sensitive?

  • 3 Replies
  • 5243 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2323
  • Activity:
    24%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Why is Armstrong's mixture so sensitive?
« on: 07/06/2022 13:10:24 »
Armstrong's mixture is an insanely sensitive explosive consisting of a roughly stoichiometric mix of red phosphorus and potassium chlorate. It can be triggered by a gentle tap and the mechanism behind such extreme sensitivity is a bit puzzling. I can understand highly sensitive molecular explosives such as nitrogen trichloride or ethyl perchlorate where bond weakness allows for low activation energy. Potassium chlorate needs about 300c to release oxygen. I wonder is it a case of embedded p4 molecules in the red phosphorus. Any ideas? PS I have never done this nor do I intend to-I find my hands to be useful.
« Last Edit: 07/06/2022 16:35:52 by Kryptid »
Logged
Did I really say that?
 



Offline SeanB

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1277
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 21 times
Re: Why is Armstrong's mixture so sensitive?
« Reply #1 on: 07/06/2022 15:48:50 »
Probably a catalyst reaction, where the one decomposes the other with only a minor addition of energy to get over the catalyst activation energy, and then the released energy is enough to drive the reaction strongly, and very exothermically, to completion.
Logged
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31103
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Why is Armstrong's mixture so sensitive?
« Reply #2 on: 07/06/2022 18:46:34 »
I read that part of the reason why mixtures of  sulphur and chlorates are so unstable is something like this:
 the sulphur is attacked, even at room temperature, by oxygen.
That produces sulphur dioxide and that, together with water in the air is acidic.
That acid reacts with the chlorate releasing oxides of chlorine.
Those react with the sulphur to produce more acid(s).

The reaction is "autocatalytic".
The heat generated also speeds up all of the reactions.

I suspect something similar happens with phosphorus.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter

Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2323
  • Activity:
    24%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: Why is Armstrong's mixture so sensitive?
« Reply #3 on: 09/06/2022 11:04:46 »
Interesting, however I think the main danger with the chlorate/sulphur occurs in storage where slow oxidisation causes a build up of acid and once it starts it becomes, as you say, autocatalytic. In my reckless youth I often made "chlorate gunpowder" with sodium chlorate which was freely available at the time and quite inexpensive but unfortunately hygroscopic. I found that to initiate this mix with impact it had to be put on a solid metal surface and struck very hard with a hammer. I don't know if any tests on the storage stability have been done with Armstrong's. It is or has been used in a phlegmatized (no idea how one could do that) form in toy cap guns.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.31 seconds with 34 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.