The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. How much of me is original?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How much of me is original?

  • 8 Replies
  • 3731 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Harri (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 138
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 14 times
How much of me is original?
« on: 29/06/2022 21:14:17 »
As I approach 65 years of age I was wondering just how much of my body I was born with is still original? I know my dna remains the same but does the whole of the body continually lose and regenerate new cells? For instance, will any of the original heart I was born with remain with me now?
Logged
 



Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: How much of me is original?
« Reply #1 on: 29/06/2022 22:13:57 »
Quote from: Harri on 29/06/2022 21:14:17
I know my dna remains the same
I wouldn’t be so sure about that. DNA does mutate as it passes from cell to cell and we age.

Quote from: Harri on 29/06/2022 21:14:17
For instance, will any of the original heart I was born with remain with me now?
I would say not a lot, if any, of the original cells. Usual quoted cell replacement is between 7 & 10 years, but can be shorter for important organs.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 
The following users thanked this post: Harri

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2404
  • Activity:
    5.5%
  • Thanked: 1015 times
Re: How much of me is original?
« Reply #2 on: 29/06/2022 22:18:46 »
Every cell split, only half the dna atoms are 'original', and the other half (both cells) are made from atoms from the environment.

All in all, probably under 0.1% (probably well under) of your birth atoms are still in you.
You birth atoms are also not original since you did an awful lot of growing before you were born.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Harri

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11035
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: How much of me is original?
« Reply #3 on: 29/06/2022 22:53:11 »
Some cells are not replaced during your lifetime. This applies to the lens of your eye, and brain cells.
- Most parts of the cell are generated from instructions in the DNA, using new raw materials from your diet
- But if the cell does not divide after birth (eg brain), it can continue to use the same DNA with which you were born
- Some parts of the brain do generate new cells (eg hippocampus), but this does not apply to most of the brain
- There will be spot repairs to DNA when it is damaged by natural radioactivity or metabolic stress, and these repairs would be made from "new" atoms in your diet.

I understand that some of these DNA ages were determined by measuring the radioactive content of DNA from different tissues. The isotopic mix in the diet changed noticeably in the years that atmospheric nuclear testing was underway.
https://www.sciencefocus.com/the-human-body/what-cells-in-the-human-body-live-the-longest/
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Harri

Offline Harri (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 138
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 14 times
Re: How much of me is original?
« Reply #4 on: 30/06/2022 15:09:39 »
It might surprise you to know that the question originated in my head not through any particular scientific field, but because I was gathering some thoughts together for a poem. I was writing about my relationship with my mother and wondered just how much of her baby remains today 65 years on. Your replies and that very helpful article answer my question. The poem is still processing.
Logged
 



Offline Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    6.5%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: How much of me is original?
« Reply #5 on: 30/06/2022 16:36:00 »
Teeth are all I believe that is not replaced, they are used as a locator for isotopes in the water in the region that you grew up in.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 
The following users thanked this post: Harri

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21164
  • Activity:
    64.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: How much of me is original?
« Reply #6 on: 30/06/2022 17:19:41 »
So apart from bits of brain  (not teeth - they all fell out and were replaced when you were a child!) and I think a few nerves, what is "you". Is the lump of stuff that people call by your name, really the same person as on your birth or marriage certificate? If not, how can anyone be held liable for past actions? Is a 10-year passport really a  valid document?
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 
The following users thanked this post: Harri

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    10%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: How much of me is original?
« Reply #7 on: 30/06/2022 18:30:24 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 30/06/2022 17:19:41
(not teeth - they all fell out and were replaced when you were a child!)
The replacements may have already been in place, but it's probably beside the point.

I'm not saying this is an accurate mechanism to answer the question but it does give some indication.
In a typical year you can expect to eat something like 1000 Kg of food. That's about 7 times your weight.
The stuff food is made from isn't very different from the stuff you are made from.
So each year your body takes in 7 times its mass in "stuff".

If that were properly mixed then only 1/7 of you would be still there at the end of the first year.
So it's 1 in 49 after 2 years and by the time you are 65 it's pretty close to bugger all.

Obviously some bits are better mixed than others.
The chip in my front tooth that I have been carrying round since school is still there- more like 45 years than 65, but the point remains.
Most of that stuff is pretty much fixed. Skeletal bone is turned over much faster than that, but still pretty slowly.
My skeleton is something like 10Kg
It contains something like 1400 grams of Calcium
"The calcium content of bone at maturity is approximately 1,200 g in women and 1,400 g in men"
from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56060/
and it turns over about 0.5 grams per day
https://www.medscape.com/answers/241893-20078/how-much-calcium-turnover-occurs-normally-each-day
so that's about 180 grams per year or (very roughly) the whole lot gets rebuilt every 7 or 8 years.
Some bits deep in the middle might date back to when I was a teenager.
At best, very little of it will be original.
"At full-term birth, the human infant has accrued about 26 to 30 g of calcium, most of which is in the skeleton."

Just a thought; if we are what we eat, why are we not "new and improved"?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 
The following users thanked this post: Harri

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21164
  • Activity:
    64.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: How much of me is original?
« Reply #8 on: 30/06/2022 18:42:36 »

Quote
The replacements may have already been in place, but it's probably beside the point.
I doubt it. They are much bigger than "milk" teeth and couldn't possibly hide in a neonatal jaw.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.769 seconds with 50 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.