The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. Question about meta-analysis: more than one exposure-outcome per study?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Question about meta-analysis: more than one exposure-outcome per study?

  • 1 Replies
  • 2620 Views
  • 1 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline leophie (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Question about meta-analysis: more than one exposure-outcome per study?
« on: 17/08/2022 20:25:22 »
Good day  :)

I am conducting a meta-analysis and wondering if anyone can please help me with a query about included studies.

So, I have begun data extraction. However, in a few of the papers, there is more than one exposure-outcome combination, and all of the combinations meet the eligibility criteria for my study.

How should I handle this?

Can I include all of the exposure-outcome combinations?

Here is an example of what I mean. My study eligibility criteria is antithrombotics exposure and mortality outcome.

One of the papers has both warfarin and (separately) heparin as the exposure, and both report on mortality.

Both combinations meet the eligibility criteria.

Would I be able to include both on the forest plot, separately, like "Author (a)" and "Author (b)"?

I think this might affect the between-study heterogeneity (I2), since both derive from the same study, but it looks like the two are separate studies.

Please can you advise on this?

Best wishes
leophie
Logged
I have not failed; I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work. ~Thomas Edison
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21167
  • Activity:
    61%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Question about meta-analysis: more than one exposure-outcome per study?
« Reply #1 on: 17/08/2022 23:31:13 »
I would find it suspicious if somebody combined the studies of two causes (e.g. warfarin and heparin) with a common effect (mortality).To my mind, meta-analysis is only scientifically useful if it includes all the unpublished but valid data, and is strictly confined to a single cause. In other words, I generally eschew it, and prefer a single well-conducted and fully-reported study that gives me access to all the method and results so I can make up my own mind as to whether a well-defined hypothesis is supported by experiment.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: meta-analysis 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.25 seconds with 30 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.