The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Why are we here?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why are we here?

  • 6 Replies
  • 1958 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline set fair (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 467
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Why are we here?
« on: 24/08/2022 00:59:04 »
The fundamental constants and the laws of physics are just right for us. Our solar system populated with atypical planets and a moon, once said to be best explained as an observational error.

Add to that the surprising fact that we can understand the laws of nature, we who took 3.4 million years to get beyond a simple set of stone tools. Well OK, we haven't nailed the laws of nature but we have come a long way. And where did the laws of nature come from?

The anthropic principle works pretty well; there are many versions of it. I prefer one that uses the quantum-physics notion that an observer is an essential part of wave function collapse. It is more economical because then we don't need to be in a Goldylocks universe. The wave function of the big bang can only collapse to form a universe which gives rise to intelligent observers.

That deals with paragraph 1 and so far nothing new. I was watching Sabine Hossenfelder explaining, on you tube, that we discover rather than invent physics. It's what I had always assumed but it doesn't hurt to try and find an argument against. So we are here not just to be able to observe - which allowed the big bang's wave function to collapse but also to understand the laws of nature. In fact the laws and the fundamental constants came from our understanding. We don't, in fact discover physics, we invented it, we set the fundamental constants because they needed an intelligence to invent them. The wave function of the big bang had to collapse to a state where minds intelligent enough to come up with a physics which allows their own presence to evolve. The pretty thing about this is that it renders universe self contained. We created the universe which created us.

On the pessimistic side, our understanding of physics has not advanced a great deal in the last fifty years. (A sign of these times is a widening acceptance or at least willingness to entertain the many worlds hypothesis, despite it being intrinsically untestable.) Once we have something that we can call genuine artificial and conscious intelligence then our luck will run out, the coincidences which have kept us going so long will coincide no longer and the computers will finish the job.
« Last Edit: 24/08/2022 01:05:41 by set fair »
Logged
 



Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: Why are we here?
« Reply #1 on: 24/08/2022 03:22:01 »
Quote from: set fair on 24/08/2022 00:59:04
The wave function of the big bang can only collapse to form a universe which gives rise to intelligent observers.
No, that doesn't even make sense.
Quote from: set fair on 24/08/2022 00:59:04
We don't, in fact discover physics, we invented it, we set the fundamental constants because they needed an intelligence to invent them.
That's absurd.
Logged
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: Why are we here?
« Reply #2 on: 24/08/2022 12:25:16 »

Quote from: set fair on 24/08/2022 00:59:04
The wave function of the big bang can only collapse to form a universe which gives rise to intelligent observers.
Can you please explain what you think a wave function is and how it describes the big bang?
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    68.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Why are we here?
« Reply #3 on: 24/08/2022 12:51:48 »
Why are we here? Because the fundamental constants have made it inevitable.

There has indeed been something of an expansion of mystical thinking among amateurs in recent years, and describing the many-worlds model as a hypothesis is, sadly, one common example, along with the notion of observers collapsing wavefunctions. 
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Deecart

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 320
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Why are we here?
« Reply #4 on: 26/08/2022 15:32:46 »
Quote from: set fair on 24/08/2022 00:59:04
The wave function of the big bang had to collapse to a state where minds intelligent enough to come up with a physics which allows their own presence to evolve. The pretty thing about this is that it renders universe self contained. We created the universe which created us.

This could be some explaination.
If before the big bang the universe was some Bose Einstein condensate (so some multiverse quantic universe), be able to understand with some free will (that comes form the outside of this condensate...) the insight of some part of the condensate, would make this condensate "explode" into his "parts".



Logged
 



Online evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11032
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Why are we here?
« Reply #5 on: 27/08/2022 01:27:54 »
Quote from: set fair
the anthropic principle...we set the fundamental constants because they needed an intelligence to invent them
It sounds like "we are the center of the universe", all over again.

I thought that started to be discarded about 400 years ago...
Logged
 

Offline jerrygg38

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1033
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 34 times
Re: Why are we here?
« Reply #6 on: 06/09/2022 16:54:38 »
I explain this in my latest book which I first published thirty years ago. The God that we know is a natural God and not a super natural God. It is the next Darwinian evolutionary step upward for higher man out of us. Our universe has a cycle time of 1088 billion years by a normalize time varying time clock. There has been infinity of universe before us. Most exist in chaos, some produce galaxies and planets, some produce simple life, some produce higher life and very, very few produce us. The Gods of man are products of man. They were produced by the universe. Thus we are a product of multi-dimensional physics..
« Last Edit: 06/09/2022 17:06:30 by Halc »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.668 seconds with 50 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.