0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Yes - It's odd how they don't think their conspiracy theory through. If you work them through to their logical conclusions, they invariably collapse. With or without explosives.
It's odd that you say "they invariably collapse. With or without explosives" when only 3 highrise steel framed buildings have ever completely collapsed ultimately due to fire, and they all occcured on 9/11.
Quote from: L_D on 14/05/2009 10:56:47It's odd that you say "they invariably collapse. With or without explosives" when only 3 highrise steel framed buildings have ever completely collapsed ultimately due to fire, and they all occcured on 9/11.I was stating that conspiracies collapse, not buildings.
"It's odd that you say "they invariably collapse. With or without explosives" when only 3 highrise steel framed buildings have ever completely collapsed ultimately due to fire, and they all occcured on 9/11."Roughly how many skyscrapers have been hit by deliberately targeted fully loaded modern jet aircraft?Isn't it a spooky coincidence that there are also just 3 of these and they also happened on 9/11.Must be a conspiracy to only fly planes into buildings that have been packed with explosives I guess.
Here is this part of the conspiracy debunked:Conspiracy Theorists bring up the fact that the towers were the first steel high rises to fall from fire in history. The fact is the towers had other firsts that day they never seem to include.