0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Another physicist to whom I spoke also claimed that the increasing numbers of black population people could also contribute to global warming as black skin absorbes radiation more quickly and hence contribute to global warming.as more energy is more quickly absorbed then a white reflective surface.In other words the albedo of the planet is decreasing.
Quote from: Chemistry4me on 21/01/2009 22:51:32Quote from: NobodySavedMe on 21/01/2009 22:41:10Another physicist to whom I spoke also claimed that the increasing numbers of black population people could also contribute to global warming as black skin absorbes radiation more quickly and hence contribute to global warming.But it is racist!"Racist"? What do you understand the word racist means?The original statement was (very marginally) true and involved no judgement, prejudice or criticism. How does that make it "racist"? The Science was pretty poor though. He clearly hadn't worked through the numbers involved.
Quote from: NobodySavedMe on 21/01/2009 22:41:10Another physicist to whom I spoke also claimed that the increasing numbers of black population people could also contribute to global warming as black skin absorbes radiation more quickly and hence contribute to global warming.But it is racist!
Another physicist to whom I spoke also claimed that the increasing numbers of black population people could also contribute to global warming as black skin absorbes radiation more quickly and hence contribute to global warming.
I just noticed:It should say WHITE corn in Iowa, not "while corn in Iowa". I hope it did not make sense before because it sure was not meant to make sense that way.
Why? Because it is racist?
Regardless of whether or not white road surfaces would be of any use in helping reduce global warming, the fact is that firstly, global warming is a misnomer, our problem is climate change. Temperatures in some regions are rising, but as we in the UK have seen over the past years, temperatures are also reducing in other regions. 2008 brought a dismal summer to the UK, and we are now in the grips of the coldest winter for many years. The reasons for this are being attributed to a shift in the direction of the Gulf Stream and the Jet Stream. I.e. Climate change, not global warming.
Overall global temperatures may be up, but not here in the UK and the UAE, where snow falling this year and in 2004 indicates that we need to address the climate change problem with some regard to regional variations.
But this, for the UK, would mean dealing with the problem at it's source and/or along its route. We would need to address our problem in the Gulf of Mexico and the mid Atlantic to bring the Gulf Stream back on course. We do not have the technology for such.
'White tyres would keep the surfaces white' I have seen suggested here. Would they? What about all the other muck which falls on our roads? Soot, soil, airborne dust particles, dog shite, road kills, oil and grease, spillages from commercial vehicles and much much more.
Last, but by no means least, would be the cost. Since black rubber tyres would ruin any white surfaces, and white tyres would be ruined by black surfaces, the changeover could not be spread over decades. It would need to be done over a period of a few years. The cost, in monetary terms, of manpower, equipment and materials to strip and replace the estimated 380,000 kilometres of roads in the UK would be phenomenal. What would be the cost of resurfacing in excess of 6.4m kms of highways alone in the USA? As for the cost in environmental terms, I shudder to think.There can be only one course to resolving our environmental problems, a dramatic reduction in the human population coupled with the abandonment of globalisation and a return to localisation.