0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It is my belief that the only reason the NIH is amassing these studies on Ozone Therapy (since they aren't amassing studies on Snake-Oil) is that they feel they can no longer ignore what individuals across the nation and the world are constantly reporting to them when Ozone is conscientiously applied to health care.
An almost 90yo male with diabetes and the typical poor circulation and neuropathy
I've personally witnessed what would have sounded like a miracle to me, if I hadn't seen it for myself.
It is my belief that the only reason the NIH is amassing these studies on Ozone Therapy (since they aren't amassing studies on Snake-Oil)
Ignore the Know-Nothings who Pretend to Know All, especially the Hostile, Snarky Ones.
ABSOLUTELY!!Research for YOURSELF!!!!
Forget about papers indicating rare or inexpensive positive findings where both are Sadly Rare,
The problem with Cochrane, as I pointed out when it was founded, is that its principal methodology is meta-analysis.
In furtherance of your post, we need only recall how long it took for merely the Acceptance of Washing Hands before Attempting Surgery and all the Hostility it's Apostles faced for decades and decades.
Medical defence often relies on consensus, but before the awful European Union decided that science should be ruled by committee, UK law permitted the experimental evidence of one other practitioner to stand as valid defence, and thus promoted progress.