0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Your previous post was not removed, but moved to the "new theories" section of the forum. There was a "moved post" thread that explained where it had been moved to.I will shortly be moving this thread there as well, so do keep an eye out for the post explaining where it is.I have not yet had time to read your previous thread, (and may well not understand it, being a biological scientist) but might I warn you against claiming you have proven something? A far less arrogant way of going about this would be to ask if anyone can see flaws in your hypothesis. This will help you by showing any flaws you may have missed (allowing you to refine your hypothesis), but also strengthen your argument by showing you where the percieved flaws are. Claiming to have proven something does not invite discussion, and can look like an insult to the intelligence of other forum members.
PS. I am far from arrogant.
Yes, indeed, i was wrong in intepreting the ''removal''. However, i have actually proven verbally the inconsistencies. Being a scientist of physics howsoever, what right does a biological scientist have in having them selves the right to reomove something upon the speculation is it not correct?
There is certainly a breakdown here between what is classed as being able to understand the theory, and what is a personal choice.
Quote from: Mr. Scientist on 16/09/2009 00:40:37Yes, indeed, i was wrong in intepreting the ''removal''. However, i have actually proven verbally the inconsistencies. Being a scientist of physics howsoever, what right does a biological scientist have in having them selves the right to reomove something upon the speculation is it not correct?I have every right to decide to move your hypothesis to the new theories board, as does any other moderator on this forum, regardless of their educational background. Is it not a new theory? If it is, it should be in the new theories board; if it isn't, then you haven't proven anything.QuoteThere is certainly a breakdown here between what is classed as being able to understand the theory, and what is a personal choice. ...and precisely what is this supposed to mean?
I just peiced them together to make sense, if you like.
Quote from: Mr. ScientistI just peiced them together to make sense, if you like.so what you're saying is that it's new? amazing.let's put this another way: your ideas will receive more attention in this section of the forum.your original anger was that your topic was deleted. it was not. now your anger is that the topic was moved to an appropriate section. if you're angry about something like that, i think you should see a doctor. you have not been done wrong. please don't continue to act as though you have, so that we can focus on the science.