Zero Particle Theory

  • 148 Replies
  • 29395 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #100 on: 04/04/2013 15:54:15 »
The Two Slit Experiment Solved...

The two slit experiment contains positrons without an observer. So there are bump forces, and wave forces. With an observer the electrons neutralize the Positrons. So the wave forces vanish into neutral forces.

We do not find positrons most of the time because electron forces neutralize them from our observations quite often.

Positrons are abundantly around us all of the time.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #101 on: 04/04/2013 15:57:10 »
I have definitely 100% solved the Theory Of Everything. I know everything.

I just need a computer to program it into.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #102 on: 04/04/2013 16:22:56 »
Entangled Action At A Distance...

Your scale determines your true area of least resistance. A small body can pass through smaller spaces than a larger body.

Time is a scalar Point Origin of electrons, containing positrons.

Entangled particles share the same origin as scalar information. Which you could call a scalar spin force, like iron filings share the same scalar spin force as a magnet.

Two photons entangled share the same scalar spin force towards an origin. They are behaving like iron filings towards a magnet.

When they are not observed their positrons are active, and that makes the photons neutral with an electron.

When observed the interaction of electrons changes the polarity from positive to neutral. So now the photons are active again with zero mass.

The photons now turn towards their scalar origin.

« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 10:33:37 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #103 on: 04/04/2013 18:07:56 »
What is an origin?

Where science uses location as X/Y/Z you change to Scalar X / Y /Z. The area of least resistance from scale.

But there are two more locations.. In, and Out. Which is the scalar time location.

You can think of this like an hour glass with sand. X/Y/Z/In/Out with In as the hole in the middle, and out because the hole works from both positive, and negative scalar factors.

XYZ and into a hole, and out of a hole. The holes are points in the middle of electrons the nucleus of an atom. The sand is positrons moving towards points. The photon is a bunch of touching positrons passing a signal.

So the entangled photons are also entangled positrons, inside electrons, and thus a lot of cancelling out is happening...

1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + -1 + -1 + -1 + -1 to get zero mass for a photon.

But the observer uses some sort of charge to observe. You cannot observe the cloud without changing the polarity a bit.

Whatever a spin becomes is part of the observation.

Entangled particles share the same origin, because they share the same scale as a force added together. Like Rice Crispie atoms share the same origin when they are part of a rice crispy. They have no choice, their scale is added together, and their total scale determines their location, and where they will move to next.

Because Spacetime is a grain structure, this sharing of a location like Rice Crispies travels through the entire Universe. It plays the part of propagating Action At A Distance, but is in fact

Local Area Of Least Resistance From Scale
« Last Edit: 04/04/2013 18:16:05 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #104 on: 04/04/2013 18:28:13 »
Today's science match....

Watch this scalar origin come to life in a new printing device...

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2013/04/3d-printed-tissue.html
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #105 on: 04/04/2013 19:44:47 »
Say it with flowers....

http://www.newser.com/story/163260/flowers-use-electricity-to-talk-with-bees.html

The shared origin of entangled particles can be taken advantage of. The Positrons that pass messages, pass the origin, and also share the origin of whatever they touch. Positrons are scalar particles, they can touch at a certain speed to pass a message. You can make a whole line of them touch if you send the message fast enough, and that line will all share the same origin. The bees can also create a positive charge like a Positron. So the bees can create a message through the positrons to a flower, and that message will pick up the flower origin and pass it to the bee as poise time. The bee now just allows the poise time to reverse back to the flower. The bee dance can be used in this way. Cause Positrons to share an origin by touch, and the bees will pick up on it.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #106 on: 05/04/2013 10:52:18 »
We eliminate positrons by observation...

Observation eliminates positrons on Earth. If you put the positrons back into the picture you get...

Unobserved photon = Positron
Unobserved photon  = +1
Unobserved photon  = Convex sphere

Observed Photon = Positron + Electron Pairing
Observed Photon = Neutral
Observed Photon = Flat

So whenever we see a photon we add an electron to a positron. Therefore the photon is a positron until observed. Observing a photon means giving the photon an origin to you, entangling it to an electron. The electron acts as a locator, the locator is like iron filings around a magnet. The photon gets an origin to locate to.

A rainbow is the arrangement of photons to an origin based on scale. The rice Crispy effect of scale through a grain structure. Distance through scale from Red to Blue (example) to origin.

« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 10:54:41 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #107 on: 05/04/2013 11:07:36 »
You also get a push Gravity from the missing positrons. You also get mass from the push gravity. You also get Dark Matter from the neutral Photons.

Simple. Just one word 'Pull', that messed science up since 1640's.

Tell Isaac Newton.... Maths is not proof.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #108 on: 05/04/2013 11:26:07 »
People ask Why Is The Universe Expanding?

The structure of the Universe is granular. Colour has location to origin of observer. When an observer observes they set a new origin to the photons. Scale towards the new origin creates a new rainbow with Red furthest away. Spacetime grain flows to the area of least resistance which is always in the location of a Black Hole (which may not be a black hole). By looking at the Milky Way you can see that the grain builds up to a dome at the black hole location (which may not be a black hole).

The particles are probably negatively scaled towards the black hole location, or blocked in the Black Hole location. Anyway, you can see a change in scale towards the black hole location.

Red shift is to do with the arrangement of scale through a grain structure towards an origin. One origin leads to the next origin in a fractal pattern of Newton's Kissing problem.

The change between origins has to do with entanglement.
« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 11:28:58 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #109 on: 05/04/2013 11:30:09 »
What is a black hole?

I'm beginning to think that it isn't a black hole. More like an hour glass with two bubbles spurting out material. The point at which the two bubbles touch is flat, and neutral. A neutral hole would be a bit like a Black Hole.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23248-giant-milky-way-bubbles-blown-by-black-hole-merger.html
« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 11:33:08 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #110 on: 05/04/2013 11:34:31 »
What are the bubbles?

Huge Positron and electron flow collisions changing to neutral photons. Or the reverse, that the material is moving into the bubbles.

The scale of the Milky way is from thin to thick in the middle. I need to run it on my computer to get a more accurate description of it.
« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 11:48:46 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #111 on: 05/04/2013 11:52:14 »
The thing is that the Universe could be scaling down from very large to very small. It means that particles split into smaller bits all of the time. 1 becomes 13 bits. This becomes a new origin with the central bit as a neutral location to move into. The middle is invisible, so that leaves 12 bits that can be seen. 6 positive, and 6 negative.
« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 11:54:25 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #112 on: 05/04/2013 13:28:51 »
All particles are the same...

There are just two particles in the whole Universe...

Positron and Electron

The photon is a positron that changes to both combined in a flash to become a Neutrino.

The other particles are different scaled versions of the same particles, and the scaling is a fractal, so easy to reproduce.

So therefore just 2 particles, a bit of scaling, and that''s a Universe. What's that? 100 lines of computer code at the most. Probably more like 20 lines.

A Universe in 20 lines of code... just need a fast PC.

My speed problem is here... 4 frames per second, and hardly any particles...
« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 13:36:03 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #113 on: 06/04/2013 08:50:38 »
My Role In The Theory Of Everything

My current role is to say as much as possible to help as many people as possible in their particular problems. But it is not to be 100% involved in any particular subject just yet. So I am not 100% precise, because I don't stop on one subject for longer than a few minutes. In plate tectonics for example I said that an object has scale in the X / Y / Z, now a more precise version is to use vectors for force of Gravity so that an elephant's feet sink into mud. Even that is not 100% precise. If I sometimes stop to fix mistakes, I can do it, but then I have to stop on a subject for a long time. Which subject do I stop on? It's a Self Teaching Theory Of Everything, I probably can keep solving things for the rest of my life. Do I stop on Cancer, do I stop on Invention, Do I stop on the creation of life? No, I go with the flow in my head at the moment, and the computer program that I write  will have details in it to measure.

You should say...

"I know what he means, but it isn't very accurate, I will fix it myself."

Or

"He got that part wrong."

So let's just stop a little longer on Plate Tectonics as an example.

The Force Of Gravity a bit deeper, and tectonics...

Because of Positrons being scalar particles they melt into a surface of electrons. This melting has its own physics that work as flow through a structure. The flow acts as jets, and the surface acts as a pipe. An elephant's feet act as an outflow of Gravity from above, so act as exhaust pipes of a flow towards Earth. An asteroid acts as a pipe towards Earth from an outside flow. The asteroid also has a bow shock as it moves forwards. A bow shock is the melting away of Positrons.

Positrons melt away, move into electron spin, the spin acts as a caterpillar track, the caterpillar track creates a jet, and the jet is the magnetic push force. So the resistance towards Gravity is countered by a jet. In other words a push force Gravity should not work on a sphere towards Gravity as the side of the sphere moving forwards would exhibit higher pressure. But the jet force counters the higher pressure, and so you get a zero net change. So you can move the Earth into a push flow, because the push flow is then a jet flow. The shapes of the flow act as pipes, and an elephant's feet are acting as exhaust pipes for scaled down Positrons which will be new particles of push magnetism.

Plate tectonics includes all of these forces. It can be worked out very precisely. It is not for me however to get fixated on a subject. I have to work on everything. I don't have time to stop on a subject. I don't have time to do maths. But I have an image of plate tectonics in my head including moving the origin of a plate's X/Y/Z, and including the Gravity, and the jet forces. But the fun part is leaving this to the mathematicians.

Mathematicians should use me as a first step towards solving a problem. That is my role in the Theory Of Everything.

My second role is to create the computer program of the fractal.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #114 on: 06/04/2013 11:10:33 »
THE MOST IMPORTANT POST OF ALL TIME

Feet, Legs, and Bodies As Jet Streams...

The Missing AMS Data....

Dark Matter....

This is quite important actually. AMS picked up Electrons, and it Picked up Positrons, what it didn't pick up is both combined which makes Neutral particles.

IMPORTANT MESSAGE!!! NEUTRAL BUMPS NEUTRAL

It's the missing piece of the jigsaw puzzle, it's the Dark Matter.

The Neutral flow is of course zero, but an electron is -1.

Energy moves towards lower energy...

Neutral bumps towards Electrons.

The jet stream of particles from an elephant's feet is Neutral. It crushes you, but it's neutral. Gravity is a constant C, but the two forces combined are not a constant. There can be more positrons involved, or more electrons involved in the mixture. The Neutral is the Gravity as a combination of both forces.

If you take feet as jetstreams they match the body of an animal to take their weight. I'll give you some very nice examples...

A deer walks through mud, it's neutral jetstream creates hooves into the mud. You can see the stream jetting in that direction, and as a slight diagonal flow force.

A tree has roots, it's neutral jetstream is into dirt. You can see the jetstream wiggling its way through the dirt as its roots. The tree itself is Newtons 3rd law, that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

We have flat feet, and our opposite action is our hair.

But IMPORTANT news....

Dinosaurs feet do not appear to match their body size. Something is wrong. That needs looking into. Is G a constant? No it isn't, it's based on Positrons and electrons mixed. We would not feel much of a change if gravity changed, but our Neutral jetstream becomes stronger. How strong can a neutral jetstream get? Unknown. But I would say that the jetstream can become unhealthily strong as a pressure inside our bodies.

I also would like you to take a look at hieroglyphics. There is a message in them that I don't wish to discuss on here. The clue is in the Pyramid Lightbulb, and another clue is in the Ankh.

Neutral Gravity is not a constant, it is just Neutral, and always zero, but that doesn't make it a constant.

The change is in the jetstream like a magnet can have a change in jetstream. The spin increases to counter the flow. If you have a spin, and put pressure on that spin it increases. When an ice skater pulls their arms in they go faster.

Our internal body spin counters our Neutral Gravity flow. And that spin speed I think can become unhealthy.

The T-Rex has feet the area of an elephant, but only two of them. That's not right. The Brontosaurus is huge, it's feet don't seem to match.

Egyptians built a pyramid, what for? Maybe there is a clue?

Sometimes you have to just go with what you are thinking. If it's a bit strange to scientists, I'm a scientist too. I don't treat science as 100% accuracy, because I am the most accurate that science has ever been, and I know that science has only ever been about 5% accurate. I am about 90% accurate. Who cares if I go with what I am thinking, and I don't use maths? My accuracy is greater than maths. My computer program is greater than me, but I am then not playing my important role of talking to everyone.

When I watch Richard Feynman, people complain that he wasn't talking enough to the public. It's true, I like it when he talks to the public. If you sit doing maths as proof, you might get 5% accuracy if you don't know what you are doing.

Is G a constant... no.
Is the maths a constant... yes. G = A Neutral Force.

Ok so now you can fix the maths by using some sort of jetstream formula to take into account Positrons, and electrons, and their Neutral combination as a bump force, and combined with a total pressure from Positron scaling with a delay.

I shouldn't use maths myself, I shouldn't reduce my talking time. I have the physics in my head, and that's all I need.

I can tell people a lot. I can get a noble prize every 5 minutes. That's how fast I solve a problem. In fact whilst I am typing I am solving things in real time. By the time I get to the end of a post it is solved in the post.

It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #115 on: 06/04/2013 11:22:59 »
I now have enough information for the Computer Program.

I think I was waiting for Neutral as a bump force. That's the final part that I only figured out from the AMS data. My next post therefore will be the computer program.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #116 on: 06/04/2013 13:39:56 »
I started more of the Computer Program, but I still have a lot going through my head.

I have the red shift figured out as physics...

Colour is spin in a scaled container. So like an Ice Skaters arms the colour is fixed to spin speed by pressure. The Universe has pressure, it's made from scalar particles in a grain structure. Red is the least pressure, and blue is the higher pressure.. etc. Pressure through scalar spin is visible in a rainbow, the red is at the top, low pressure, and blue at the bottom, high pressure. Spin speed, and scalar changes.

So red shift is due to pressure in the universe rising. The red moves into an area of least resistance. Away from the centre, and away from all points.

It's great because I can make my computer program use mathematical colours even for invisible particles. Just follow those rules but change the scale for a Quantum Human.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #117 on: 06/04/2013 13:57:54 »
The Universe is splitting into finer pieces.

A pressure change in the Universe will scale us down. We must be constantly scaling down. The physics are to split particles into 13 parts so that the new parts are scaled down from the old part. It doesn't actually end the Universe or anything. It makes the Universe have a higher resolution, and more chaos. Which is actually a good thing. If you watch a HD TV, and the old SD TV it is better to watch the HD TV. The Universe is getting more HD as time goes by. People get more intelligent, and evolution has more to work with. The Universe has a fractal, and by looking at trees you can see that the fractal is getting smoother from the old Hexagon shape.

Yes the universe started off with just 13 points, separated by a great distance. It splits down, and each split is a new set of physics that can be used in evolution.

It works for germs too, they can become more complex. In fact the germs have first pick of the  new physics. You can imagine that the physics match a germs scale better than our scale. So it can grab a weapon that we can't.

It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #118 on: 06/04/2013 20:26:22 »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #119 on: 07/04/2013 01:16:40 »
Earlier on today I was setting up the program that will hopefully create the Universe. I expect it to do some strange things, and program itself. But after a few lines of code I saw a scaling sphere on the screen. I was a bit shocked because I didn't program that, and I thought that somehow I had tapped into the Quantum Physics of the computer. But it's a really good optical illusion in fact. I am just moving 12 points towards the middle of the screen. It's a bit like those human dancers that you can find that are made from dots. YouTube blurred the quality, but the illusion is here...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfMafhyovSY&feature=youtu.be
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #120 on: 07/04/2013 18:32:00 »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #121 on: 08/04/2013 09:04:40 »
Life, and Intelligence emanating from the Earth...

Is it possible that life comes from the centre of the Earth as an outflow? I have been studying gravity, and its outflow, and there is an Inverse square law in both directions. Everyone knows the inverse square law of Gravity, but this inverse square law is more interesting.

Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, so the inverse square law has an equal, and opposite reaction on the Earth. Now Gravity is cancelled out by spin, and flow, and so it is hard to actually measure mass 100% accurately. If the Earth contained a flow force similar to a singularity, it would be cancelled out by an inverse outflow. This outflow would be able to create life by creating particles through the Earth from pressure.

Well, I found a relationship to this information. It is in the skin of animals, and life...

The Outflow of life

The Inverse square law is visible in the skin combined with the mass, and combined with the contact with the Earth of points, and distance from the Earth. So for example...

1/ You have the low end of the scale. The bird which is lightweight, with feathers flowing out in every direction. It's outflow is high compared with its body weight. Two spindly legs, and spends a lot of time a long distance away from the Earth. Call this the light scale.

2/ Low to medium weight you have the cat, and the dog. The cat with 4 legs in contact with the Earth, covered in fur, and outflow relating to the 4 points in contact with the Earth. So fur on the back where fur is on our head is a relationship to outflow in the same direction. Spends most of the time up to about 2ft away from the Earth.

3/ You have a human, about 10 stone, two legs touching the Earth, 1ft square contact. This human has smooth skin, some hair at the top, and some genital hair. The smooth skin, and the hair are the outflow forces. 6ft away from the Earth. This is the exact middle scale, which you can call the Neutral scale. I think that this neutral scale is important to intelligence.

4/ Getting bigger, the cow. 4 legs in contact with the Earth. The nails are starting to become hooves, the fur is getting shorter from the cat, and the dog. Th skin is still smooth. 5ft away from the Earth.

5/ The elephant. 4 legs in contact with the Earth. The nails are thick. The feet are flat. The fur is dwindling away. The skin is starting to become wrinkled. The wrinkles are related to the outflow changing back to an inflow, like a snowflake, and a Bose/ Einstein Condensate. 8ft away from the Earth.

6/ The tree. Multiple contacts with the Earth as roots. The feet embed into the ground. The fur has become leaves, and the skin is extremely wrinkled. A powerful inflow, and outflow combined. The tree has taken on its own life giving properties like the Earth. It's height is divided into roots flows, hard to measure per root.

I believe that this is the inverted Inverse Square Law as Newton's 3rd law that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

The flows are also related to temperature. So lizards have a different flow force, and are also very close to the ground. Like snakes.. you never see a fury snake.

Insects, extremely close to the ground. Exoskeleton.

I also think that bones are a neutral change location.
« Last Edit: 08/04/2013 09:31:57 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #122 on: 08/04/2013 10:45:24 »
Hexagonal Fractals in Nature...

I say that trees are smoothing out an hexagonal fractal. What does that mean? Well it is better if I show you. These next two examples have a clear hexagonal structure, because they are the perfect mathematical size. It's a bit like the perfect woman, you want the best symmetry, well these trees have the best symmetry... 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/51035740406@N01/5669558892/

http://urbanist.typepad.com/creature_of_the_shade/2008/07/confronting-vegetation-petrophile-sessilis.html

It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #123 on: 08/04/2013 11:08:04 »
Holes

Think of a Black Hole as power. A hole is power, and energy in a flow of particles. The whirlpool spinning around a hole is locating energy to a circular space. Locking it there means that it can be used. An electron is a hole, it's energy is a neutral spin around the hole, the same as the flow of water around a whirlpool. Holes are power, and the Earth has a lot of power, so I say that it has a hole.

I want to also add that the important part of atoms is their holes, and their flows. The nucleus is Neutral, but can flow towards negative holes, so the Nucleus can flow towards electrons, and that is time. When a Neutral force moves around a hole, it takes on the hole spin. So then the Neutral force becomes an electric field. Static electricity is the Nucleus flowing through the electrons to become a static electric field. So a balloon can be rubbed, and Neutral forces will change to static electricity. The rubber is not good as a conductor because it is Neutral, but the Neutral easily changes into electrons. You could say that rubber is not a good container of water because it is a full bucket of water already.
« Last Edit: 08/04/2013 11:12:51 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #124 on: 08/04/2013 11:34:45 »
The Bose / Einstein Condensate

The condensate is the opposite flow of static electricity. In static electricity the nucleus flows out towards electrons, takes on the electron spin to become energy. The snowflake reverses the flow towards the nucleus.. electrons take on positrons, and move towards Neutral areas. The condensate exaggerates a snowflake to its final solution. Time is flowing backwards.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #125 on: 08/04/2013 11:36:21 »
Where are the positrons?

You see them as photons. Whatever science is calling a positron, isn't a positron. It's probably a double positron. Call it a dirty positron for simplicity. There is some sort of scalar change happening very fast, and it is so fast that a photon is taking on the part of 3 other particles. I think that time is faster than C, so that might be why.
« Last Edit: 08/04/2013 11:42:02 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #126 on: 08/04/2013 12:01:04 »
Solving Everything

It may seem hard to believe but over the years I have been solving everything as an independent witness of science. I never studied science so I had to re-invent it all from scratch. That was for fun. So I re-invented things right back from before Newton, and didn't read anything. I came up with Gravity, and Time, and Dimensions, and my own set of particles, and my own set of rules. I have solved almost everything now. It is interesting however to read my old posts. For example when I invented Dark Matter...

http://theabsolute.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=4962&start=100

My posts started in 2003, and get progressively better over time. But in the above example I am calling Dark Matter.. ghost. That's because I just invented it. I also invented Dark Flow. The words were not in use at the time, so I just came up with the physics, and gave them my own names. You may think it is strange to call Dark Matter 'Ghost' but I don't think that anybody had heard of Dark Matter in 2009. It had been out of circulation for years. I also invented the Aether, but of course it was already in use. I just didn't know about it. I also invented the Aether sink holes, and spurt holes as time holes.

When I say invented, I mean re-invented without knowing it. To me.. I have solved everything in the Universe, but to everyone else.. I came after somebody else.

But my point is that I have played the parts of Newton, Einstein, and everyone else, all on my own.

This gives me a great deal of vision of the Universe in my mind. I have a real connection with it. I can fly around the Universe, and see everything at any scale. It's amazing.

It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #127 on: 08/04/2013 12:25:46 »
In the above as well, you have to remember that Dark matter came up in my theory because I was using a push Gravity system. Not because some Galaxy was spinning wrong. Dark Matter is a natural occurrence of a Push Gravity system, and so are bubbles.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #128 on: 08/04/2013 12:42:19 »
Then this link, has yet another link where I think of Dark Matter in 2004, but unfortunately the link has gone...
http://theabsolute.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=115168#p115168

That post caused NASA to notice the Pioneer Anomaly. I asked NASA in Feb 2004 if their spaceships were slowing down, and they said no. Then in August 2004 they had a meeting and found the Pioneer anomaly from some old data going back to 1970.

In the end though it turned out not to be Dark Matter afterall.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #129 on: 09/04/2013 00:19:10 »
Cause And Effect

Cause and effect are added to Newton's 3rd law that every action has an equal, and opposite reaction.

The very first cause...

Inflation from a hole. So you get the sphere, and the hole all at once. Equal, and opposite. Newton's 3rd law.

The effect
Zero is created. The sphere, and it's hole added together equals zero, equal, and opposite. 1 + -1 = 0. You get neutral space.

That happened once, it happens infinitely from infinite points. It equals zero, the opposite of zero is infinity.

What you do here is create an infinite rule that cancels itself out. The positions of the sphere are cancelled out by Newton's Kissing Problem, which is a shape that has a pattern of symmetry from natural cause, and effect.

The next stage is filling in the gaps. There is always a gap to fill in.

Then the particles start to touch each other. Now Newton's 3rd law is to to the opposite to touch.. move away.

Then infinity squashes all of the particles together from inflation. The opposite is to shrink down.

Anyway, eventually form Cause, and effect you get now. And what has happened is that all of the rules of Cause, and effect, and equal, and opposite forced only one possible outcome for the Universe. Zero Particle Theory.

But I say that pull doesn't exist. What is the equal, and opposite to push?

The half tennis ball shows you that the equal, and opposite to a bump surface, is a dip surface. Convex, and concave. So pull, is actually flow into a hole.

And then people wonder how do we start a thought off in our head. What is the first cause of a thought...

The energy of thought is the inflation from a hole the same as the first Cause of the Universe. Not much has actually changed in billions of years. Just a constant set of Cause, and effect, and Newton's 3rd Law.

So why is science so complicated?

In 1746 Isaac Newton became very famous with his ideas on Gravity. A celebrity status, with a bold man as the role model with more men to follow him. I think of the seagulls in Finding Nemo all saying "Pull, pull, pull pull pull, pull..." with trill voices. By turning physics on its head with a pull force instead of a push force science became the most impossible puzzle to solve. Everyone trying to fix this problem, and anyone saying that Gravity is a push force is a joke. It's the Emperors New Suit that you are stupid if you don't call Gravity a pull force.

Then everything started to work nicely backwards, because of Newton's 3rd law that things can be worked out by their opposite reaction. But pull is only similar to flow into a hole, not exact enough to work forever. You end up with Dark matter as a push force.

Now you have a pull force, and Dark Matter as a push force, and yet they are both the exact same force. The problems aren't over yet...

You get this mass where there should be a hole. Nobody used the tennis ball idea, so nobody has the holes in the Earth in the right places, they have mass in the holes. And Electrons get a mass.

Now electrons have a mass so Quantum physics is messed up. because the electron is now backwards, and so the Michelson and Morley experiment is not towards holes it is towards mass. The photon should be in a wind from mass, but not from holes. So that is all backwards.

You have another problem. You don't have electron holes, you have electron mass, so in that hole you have a particle missing. The missing particle is playing the part of gravity. So you have gravity missing. So you need a particle for mass, and come up with the Higgs Boson. So now you have invented a new particle to replace the one in the electron hole. You have really found a scalar particle of some sort, and it doesn't really matter which one it is, because the electron, and positron are scalar particles that make all of the other scalar particles.

So you have missing positrons, and you start the two slit experiment. Guess what, you find the missing positrons, but you don't know about them. So now you think that weird things are happening to photons.

Anyway, it goes on like Bizarro World in Superman comics...

http://noahpinionblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/i-found-bizarro-economics-world.html

I turn to these people who can see the emperor in his new suit, and I say "Pull, pull, pull, pull..." in a trill voice. Scientists shout "Banned, Banned, Banned, Banned..."

Brilliant! 1746 is strong in the Bizarros.

Einstein doesn't help. He takes advantage of the mess that science is in. basically, at this point you could say almost anything, and get away with it. With science backwards lets just take physics away completely and give it to the observer. So now the observer is reverse rolled into the physics.

You have a pull force where there should be a push force, and you have an observer watching a train to account for the physics on the train.

Then there should be a flow towards the Earth, but you have a pull, so Einstein decides to bend Spacetime. Oh brilliant!!! The bend was the flow, now it's a bend. You may as well add a twist to the bend because its a plughole, so Einstein adds a twist to the bend, but backwards.

So now you have a pull force that bends spacetime with a twist, instead of simple physics, a flow into holes with a twist.. it's a plughole. No difference.

Then you have a Black Hole with a pull force, and a twist that is a Galaxy. It's a whirlpool. There's no difference.

And out of 7 billion people on Earth, I'm the only one to see it. I don't even feel that clever to work it out really. It's just too obvious to be called clever.

I live on a Bizarro World, all backwards. They tell me to do the maths... it's a joke.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #130 on: 10/04/2013 10:38:27 »
Nucleus propagation and C

First you imagine Frog Spawn. A separation of the egg by a distance of jelly. You turn this into a Newton's Cradle. This is the passing of information by egg. To get the eggs to pass information they must bump each other. So they need to rock around in the jelly. Frog Spawn has a separation distance, and angle similar to Newton's Kissing Problem. If you look at Frog Spawn...

http://doubtfulnews.com/2013/02/goo-up-in-the-trees/

... you will quickly find the Hexagon. That's the Kissing Problem of stacking sphere. The jelly swells up in water, and we will call that scalar for this example. We will call the eggs Positrons. We will think of the jelly as Electrons. We will call one Kissing shape of 13 particles the Zero Particle. And to complete the Zero Particle we will scale all of this down to a gas. So now the jelly is a cloud, and the positrons are floating in the cloud. The cloud bumps in the directions of Newton's Kissing Problem. The positrons swing in the Directions of the bumps. The positrons are swinging like a Newton's Cradle. When the positrons bump they act as Photons. When they don't bump they are hidden in the electron cancellation. 1 + -1 = 0.

The act of creating the Newton's Cradle is both random from the CMB, and also Observer propagated. All you have to do to get the flow in a certain direction is degenerate the cloud. We degenerate the cloud of electrons at an angle through the Newton's Kissing shape to change the Two Slit Experiment from a CMB wave into an Observer Propagated wave. The CMB wave looks different to the Observer wave because it has no direction apart from a newton's Kissing Problem structure, which is mostly hexagonal. Particles passing through a hexagonal structure move in a wave pattern. Hexagons link to other hexagons in a wave formation.

The propagation of light is a Frog Spawn Fractal.
« Last Edit: 10/04/2013 10:42:30 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #131 on: 10/04/2013 10:49:25 »
Propagate light, propagate physics

The light, and the physics are related. They work the same way as each other. If you propagate light using the above method, you can propagate mass the same way. If you haven't downloaded my snowflake generator, here it is... press the spacebar to make it work...

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pinchopaxton/Snowflake.rar

It is the Frog Spawn propagation of matter that creates the snowflake.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #132 on: 10/04/2013 10:58:35 »
The propagation of Gravity

The Propagation of a galaxy

You can keep going.. they are all the same. Everything uses this propagation method. All that is missing is the scalar information for the other particles, and the periodic table of missing eggs in the frog spawn. The protons create an initial pattern of propagation with missing Positrons, so the propagation is a different shape. Instead of a Hexagon you might get a five pointed star. So you get the periodic table. You also get weak shearing through the propagating material as positrons can move to a free area.

It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #133 on: 10/04/2013 11:27:22 »
My science match for the previous posts moves to another Frog Spawn Fractal...

http://www.space.com/14258-space-bubbles-star-evolution.html

Notice that the fractal is both physically a fractal that energy is in the centre of a bubble of gas, and visually a fractal that the light is a sphere within a sphere. The egg of the frog being the movement, and the jelly being the food.

So...

Tadpole = Movement

matches

Sun = movement


Jelly = Food

Matches

Gas = Food

Sphere in a sphere is both a physical, and aesthetic fractal. The Universe is made from fractals that obey fractal laws.
« Last Edit: 10/04/2013 11:35:22 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #134 on: 10/04/2013 12:14:33 »
I sort of wondered if you could actually make a magnetic version of this Newton's cradle. You could try liquid iron, and oil with an iron core suspended from a wire. The wire being attached to an electric current. Put the oil in a trough touching the cores, then switch on the current in a linear direction passing along the wires. The oil should propagate along the iron cores to the end of the trough. If you made the trough a see saw, it could rock back to the beginning again. So now you have an electric rocker switch using Frog Spawn propagation.

If you could make a jelly version with magnetic cores, you could get some nice natural shapes in the jelly. Watch the jelly change into a starfish for example. Or some bouncy balls that start to bounce on their own.
« Last Edit: 10/04/2013 12:20:15 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #135 on: 10/04/2013 13:08:06 »
The fractals smooth out.

As the fractal splits, and splits, it smooths out. But when you understand the fractal, you can still see it. I can just about see it in a tree for example. I can just about see it everywhere in this video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJyUtbn0O5Y&feature=youtube_gdata_player

But it is very smoothed out by now.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #136 on: 10/04/2013 21:08:32 »
Time and Dilation to local points...

The time that I call Poise Time is located inside points. It is at each point of the Frog Spawn, and curls up in there as energy. Per point means local, and local time means that matter must be local to a point to use that time. The outflow of time separates distance of matter to time. So the inflow being local uses the nearest time nucleus, and not its original time nucleus. So when time flows backwards to make a snowflake, it is not backwards to its original location, it is backwards towards a point, where In flow is backwards, and Out flow is forwards. So movement reorganises time backwards from forwards, but different to the the Standard Model time does not have an arrow. It has locality to points, In, and Out.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #137 on: 11/04/2013 00:09:56 »
Growing Old...

In a fractal Universe I have a fractal description of time using holes separated by Newton's Kissing problem. Time flows out for energy propagation, and heat, and time flows back into the nearest local hole for negative propagation, and cold. The negative flow towards holes folds inwards to create snowflake fractals. But it also flows inwards when energy is running low from that hole. Points require energy to hold them open, and that energy is like a plug in the hole. If a point starts to empty, then the plug is out of the hole, and time travels into that hole.

Humans are a DNA energy pack of time. It flows from the holes, and propagates our shape. It uses scalar energy to keep flowing forwards.. but it runs out. At about 40 your time flow has run out, and so time starts flowing backwards for you... yes backwards.

You are not flowing into your past (well just a bit with memory slowly working backwards), but you are taking in energy from the opposite direction... like a hand saw. Energy out, energy in for 40 years to complete the energy cycle.

This change in direction at 40 hits you at first. The slow down is a low peak in your mental abilities. But it gains speed back to something close to before. But now with energy flowing inwards you start to wrinkle. You are taking on the energy of the snowflake fractal, and it isn't smooth, it is wrinkly. Like a balloon going down. You can only last so long on backwards energy, it is like an extra fuel tank.

But the nice thing about it is that you are being stored in holes. So it gives your imagination the chance to say that there is an afterlife, because your energy went into holes. Which is another way to examine DNA... is DNA a person stored in holes?

That is fantasising a bit. Anyway you get older by reversing the energy of time back into holes. You brain starts to pick thing out in the wrong sequence. And then you forget names, because those names are in the wrong order to work in reverse.

Say Tommy is 48, and you remember Tommy at 12. You look at Tommy, he looks to old to be Tommy. Your flow is backwards.

But time itself is only energy. Any reference to Past, and Future is a misunderstanding. It's just a flow force from holes. No need to add anything paranormal to it. It may be fun for scientists to think of these paranormal events, but science should be accuracy, not fun.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #138 on: 11/04/2013 10:35:32 »
The time / origin displacement

Connected particles share an origin. Particles connect locally in X/Y/Z/In/Out/Flat-line. Time connects locally just the same. In / Out / Flat-line are the origin of the force of particles. At the point of In / Out / Flat-line there is scalar regression. Scale works like curvature, and time starts at flat line In / Out. Time is a bit like a trampoline combined with inflation. So if the trampoline is concave you get inflation filling the concave dent. If the trampoline is convex then time is feeding outwards, and you have inflation. We share a fractal with a Universal Membrane. X/Y/Z, and Out are local to us, but In, and Flat-line are local to the Universal membrane. Action at a distance is really local to In/ and Flat-line. The sorting order of the Universal Membrane is scalar. Colours most likely sort to pressure in a Universal membrane, but still appear to us at X / Y /Z coordinates.

Mathematically the origin can be tied to particles as vectors. Physically the origin is tied to particles in the Nucleus of the particle in a hole. The hole in the standard model would lead to the 4th dimension, but the holes are too fragmented to work in the standard model.

The problem with the standard model is that it has no physics for time. So you can make anything work that you like. I always use physics, and I don't know how to get the physics of time working as an arrow. But anyway, my fractal time works better than an arrow, because it allows free thought. If a body is connected to its own time energy it only uses its own time energy locally, and that allows an individual to separate themselves from the rest of the Universe. So that person then has thoughts individual to themselves.. free thought.

If time were an arrow (which I find impossible unless you just use words, and no physics) then free will becomes connected to an arrow of time, and you have no free will.

Anyway Gravity is local, so time should be local, that makes more sense.

I always use physics when I talk of ideas, I have no ideas without physics. I have physics for Gravity, magnetism, time, and nothing. I think that's why the Standard Model is so incomplete, and can get away with just saying the 4th dimension.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #139 on: 11/04/2013 11:06:02 »
Today's science link....
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130410141541.htm

So earlier I was saying that at 40 time starts to flow in reverse for you. The order in which you sort information is taken in reverse. You adapt to this reverse thinking pattern, because you sort things backwards.

4 + 3 = 7
3 + 4 = 7

You don't notice.

But I can give you an example. Sometime soon the World Snooker Championships begin. There are older commentators who used to play the game as World Champions. They often talk about loss of concentration in their older years, and a common complaint is forgetting to pot the ball. This is how snooker works...

In order of thinking...
1/ You calculate the white angle towards another ball to pot that ball.
2/ You look at the next ball that you would want to pot. Calculate how to get onto the next ball within about a 1ft radius of accuracy.


That's the correct order, but a problem begins in older players, that they forget stage 1, and take it for granted.

So the older player...

1/ Calculate how to get onto the next ball within about a 1ft radius of accuracy.
2 Forgets to calculate the white angle towards another ball to pot that ball.

Their thoughts are occurring in reverse order, but so good at potting that the final stage usually doesn't matter. If a professional snooker player could train themselves to think in reverse, then they could become fantastic again.

It is often the first thing that is skipped in older years. because the timing of that first thing seems to make the least sense to you...

"How did I forget to pot the ball, that is the main thing?"

The main thing is turning up last, and you skip it by rushing.

"I'm at the final stage now, the positioning of the ball. So I can't have missed anything out."

But the above link gives you some idea of how we sequence thoughts, and if that sequence is messed up, it is time reversal. But time as an energy source, not as Past, Present, and Future.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #140 on: 11/04/2013 14:32:30 »
The Universe as a local object...

The physics that I use depend upon curves, and the curves need to cancel each other out to get a zero state Universe. If you start with any set of physics they need a location inside something. You have to be careful how you work this out, because to keep the zero state you are putting particles on top of something. So if you have a single particle with a hole, you have a set of curves, and the convex curves are the particles, and the concave curves are the hole. They are inside a huge version of the same thing. In scale curves start to look like straight lines. So at the point where the Universe is large you can maintain the zero state by putting the particles inside a huge object with straight lines. This connects your inner particles to the outer membrane when they are cancelling each other out with...

1 + -1 = 0

1 + -1 = merged with the Universe.

Which sort of allows an action at a distance, because the distance has a dimension that is connected to a much bigger particle. Two photons with zero mass can be connected to the zero line of the whole Universe.

This is maybe convenient. I would prefer just to connect two photons to the Aether. It feels like there is some missing information still. A vacuum is used to move the particles, and there is no such thing as a vacuum, so it's a very cheated experiment anyway.
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #141 on: 11/04/2013 15:18:34 »
Amazing Evolution...

Zero Particle Theory uses fractals as life shapes. Especially the Hexagon through Newton's Kissing Problem. That in a particle stacking system 12 particles can surround 1 particle, and you get a common Hexagon fractal. So most creatures are already covered before evolution, and DNA are required.

What does that mean?

It means that you can almost build all of our nature from fractals without evolution, but the shapes would be missing some features.

The one thing that I am always drawn to from evolution is that baby's feet are flat. That means that the baby is ready for Gravity, and Cause, and effect are backwards because the baby has never walked on the ground before. When Cause, and effect are backwards it shows that something in DNA is very amazing.

You can say that a person with flat feet survived better to pass on their DNA, and it works in a computer simulation. But how far can that go? How many people today are born with hooves? How long would it take to change feet into hooves?

1/ Nobody today has feet with hooves. The DNA could not be passed on.
2/ DNA Cause and Effect need memory to change the human into a human with hooves.

Something has to be stored during a human lifetime that adds to DNA. And that is Poise Energy of Time. Time as an energy flowing backwards into holes accounts for Cause and effect playing backwards. The baby can be born with flat feet, or even hooves if necessary.

The computer simulations work if humans can be born with hooves to survive better, but that doesn't happen. So instead you need DNA memory. For each person with harder feet you will eventually get hooves, but the harder feet have to be memorised at each stage.

DNA requires a memory system. Feedback into holes. The snowflake.. Bose Einstein Condensate.. time reversal.


It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #142 on: 12/04/2013 20:45:24 »
Today's science match is about evolution. It doesn't match what I said, but it gives an alternative idea that I like...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130412132407.htm
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #143 on: 13/04/2013 09:51:09 »
Ok so I have been programming for a couple of days now, and the physics are starting to self build. The program is creating physics that I never thought about. Like when two bubbles stick together the centre of mass moves, and the bubbles spin around a new mass point. Although I was not programming sticky bubbles, I accidentally got those physics, because my program isn't finished yet. But the interesting thing is that the sticky bubbles really work properly, and that is because of a bow shock. I use physics for relativity, and the physics for the bow shock automatically switch the mass centre, and create the centre of rotation, and rotate the mass all in one go. No formulas to work out, just natural events occurring from a bow shock. It may even turn out that I need sticky bubbles, because a Galaxy rotates as one object I think.

When I imagined my snowflake program it worked. Now it seems that my imagined physics for the Universe are going to work as well.
« Last Edit: 13/04/2013 09:58:33 by Pincho »
It's your fault if you don't understand me.

*

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12350
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #144 on: 18/04/2013 23:59:22 »
Pincho, it's time for you to check up on the terminology of science, just not loose sentences. You have a good and original mind, but you need to set it into a context. And using too many self defined definitions makes it very hard to read. Sit down and check out how main stream science define it. Then look at what you think, but use the words, and science, that already are there. I think you're young :) And impatient. Relax, time is enough.
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."

*

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12350
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #145 on: 19/04/2013 00:05:43 »
Yeah, I know. the more your idea differs, the harder it will be to find the right words. Don't give up though, they exist, you just have to search, but I promise you will recognize them when you see them. and they will also give you more ideas. Don't assume you're the only in physics with a good mind. We all stand on shoulders, just by growing up.
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."

*

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #146 on: 02/05/2013 06:08:50 »
Pincho - Since you complained so much when I explained to you what the scientific method was and corrected your incorrect beliefs about what science is all about I thought I'd come on your turf and see if you'd justify any of your claims.

I saw only this and one other thread that you started. Before I added this post this thread consisted of 145 posts, 143 of which are yours. What are you attempting to accomplish?

When you make claims such as
Quote
You may think it is strange to call Dark Matter 'Ghost' but I don't think that anybody had heard of Dark Matter in 2009.
it's hard to take you seriously. You claimed to have never learned science and decided to reinvent it from scratch. If you never learned science then how can you expect anybody to take you seriously? In the other forum you didn't even seem willing to explain what you meant when you use the word "science" because its clear that what you mean yu that word and what others mean by it have little to do with each other. Then you make an erroneous statement like this one where you believe that nobody had ever heard of the term dark matter in 2009. You can't be serious. Only a crackpot would make such a terribly erroneous claim like that. It's unheard of to find an astronomy, cosmology or astrophysics text published within the, say, last 30 years, which doesn't talk about dark matter. Even my GR texts discuss it

So tell me. Are you willing to

(1) Define the term science as you have chosen to use the term.
(2) Explain why you're unwilling to justify any assertion that you've made to me in that other thread.
(3) Justify/clarify/explain your belief that you don't think that anybody had heard of Dark Matter in 2009.

I'd also like to hear why you'd reject science when you yourself have told us that you don't know anything about it. How you you be certain that you're talking about the same methodology that everyone else uses? I.e. how do you know that when you make a statement or attempt to make an argument hat you're doing so with sound logic?

And no. I'm not trying to be a jerk. I'm sincerely trying to understand you even if it doesn't come across that way to you.

*

Offline Ethos_

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1296
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #147 on: 02/05/2013 17:33:44 »

And no. I'm not trying to be a jerk. I'm sincerely trying to understand you even if it doesn't come across that way to you.
Good luck Pmb, I've also tried to communicate intelligently with this fellow. There is only one jerk involved here in this discussion and it isn't you. Nor is it I, we have both given it a fair effort but sadly, to no avail. Like yourself, I was interested in understanding Pincho's ideas, but he resists any and all corrective logic. I'm afraid our efforts have been terribly wasted!!!
"The more things change, the more they remain the same."

*

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #148 on: 02/05/2013 17:56:01 »

And no. I'm not trying to be a jerk. I'm sincerely trying to understand you even if it doesn't come across that way to you.
Good luck Pmb, I've also tried to communicate intelligently with this fellow. There is only one jerk involved here in this discussion and it isn't you. Nor is it I, we have both given it a fair effort but sadly, to no avail. Like yourself, I was interested in understanding Pincho's ideas, but he resists any and all corrective logic. I'm afraid our efforts have been terribly wasted!!!
I agree. It was extremely frustrating trying to talk to somoene who is only willing to make unfound claims and refuse to back them up.