0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I did think about that and I searched for how gravity affected electrons. The gist of what I read (like I say, I am a layman) was the gravitational effect on something with such miniscule mass was not measurable.
20 dimensions of space, 17 of which are too small to measure
Quote20 dimensions of space, 17 of which are too small to measureThis is similar to the concepts of String Theory and M-Theory. However, these theories are neither simple nor obvious. They are very general, having many adjustable parameters. It is quite possible that these theories may describe some aspects of some universe, but it is not obvious which parameter values (if any) might describe our universe. Regardless of how gravity and the strong nuclear force behave at the scale of these theoretical strings, or may have behaved in the distant past or far future, today they behave quite differently at the scales that humans can observe. The Strong Nuclear Force has a range which barely exceeds the width of the nucleus of an atom. In contrast, the force of Gravity easily spans the distance between galaxies. This points to some fundamental differences in the way these forces are expressed.I suggest that if you wish to study these theories in Physics, that you start by studying Mathematics, as these topics are based on some very complex mathematics.
This he folds with the fact that the density of the proton equates with that of a black hole .
...............Past the barrierI do believe that if enough force is applied , the nuclear-attractive force will engage , and the protons will latch onto each other like Alabama ticks ! I like fusion too !P.M.
Quote from: Professor Mega-Mind on 15/01/2019 13:38:51This he folds with the fact that the density of the proton equates with that of a black hole .The Schwarzschild radius is not the same as the same as its radius. The density of a BH and an electron are meaningless.No other force than gravity is a inertial force like the grav-force.When was the density of a proton ever measured to be equal to that of a black hole? Existing physics would suggest otherwise, since the Schwarzschild radius of an object with a proton's mass is 2.5 x 10-54 meters, whereas the proton's radius is only slightly less than 10-15 meters.
gravity increasing with inverse r19
Quote from: Halcgravity increasing with inverse r19 Why isn't gravity increasing as inverse r2?
Multiple, competing aspects of the uni-grav force (connectedness), combined with field-energy saturation at varying distances , equals different parameters for different sub-atomic systems .
As to the Proton-Black Hole connection , either watch the documentary , OR ?...call Nassim !P.M.