0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Let me do a math ...
Look Human DNA.. It is the best "software" which we know, it is amazing
... do you really think that is possible that God did not made at least 1. protein ...
Quote from: Hrvoje5 on 27/10/2014 21:50:19Let me do a math ... Quote from: RD on 28/10/2014 11:04:41That's a version of the " newbielink:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkyard_tornado#Details [nonactive]" flawed argument against evolution. Evolution doesn't operate like that : the progress is by minute increments over billions of generations, not all once.Darwinian evolution have too much mistakes... If I am right Darwin said that are possible that from no-living things(like a food) came a living being(like flies) and that did been asnwer on 1. question, from where came 1. bacteria(living being) but we saw it is not a correct, only a living thing can create a living being..Anyway.. Let me ask you the 1. question , from where came the first bacteria..??Btw, Darwinian theory of evolution was been changed because it was been refute..Quote from: Hrvoje5 on 28/10/2014 09:14:01Look Human DNA.. It is the best "software" which we know, it is amazing Quote from: RD on 28/10/2014 11:04:41It's very inefficient newbielink:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_bloat#Bloatware [nonactive] : newbielink:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noncoding_DNA [nonactive]. So not evidence of an newbielink:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_designer [nonactive] , ( newbielink:http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section2.html#atavisms_ex1 [nonactive] , or newbielink:http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section2.html#atavisms_ex2 [nonactive] ). If we dont understand the function that dont mean it dont have a function..Example: appendix appendicitis, 99% of atheist said that is prove of evolution, we dont need that, it dont have any function.. And miracle happend it have realy realy important function..Quote from: Hrvoje5 on 28/10/2014 09:14:01... do you really think that is possible that God did not made at least 1. protein ... Quote from: RD on 28/10/2014 11:04:41That's " newbielink:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_in_the_gaps [nonactive]" nonsense : that if science cannot currently explain exactly how something came into being then it must be the work of a god.Science can explain(partfully) , and the biggest scientists did explain, of Einstein Over Mark Twain to Newton....Ok, I cant say that we are not created from aliens, but for sure God create them..If you cant find the creator of your computer, that dont mean he dont exist, It would be silly to say that nobody did not create your computer.. Btw. I hope you understand that Theory of evolution is not a fact... Peoples which believe in Darwinian evolution are believer, It is a faith, and if I may, blind faith for now.
That's a version of the " newbielink:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkyard_tornado#Details [nonactive]" flawed argument against evolution. Evolution doesn't operate like that : the progress is by minute increments over billions of generations, not all once.
It's very inefficient newbielink:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_bloat#Bloatware [nonactive] : newbielink:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noncoding_DNA [nonactive]. So not evidence of an newbielink:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_designer [nonactive] , ( newbielink:http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section2.html#atavisms_ex1 [nonactive] , or newbielink:http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section2.html#atavisms_ex2 [nonactive] ).
That's " newbielink:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_in_the_gaps [nonactive]" nonsense : that if science cannot currently explain exactly how something came into being then it must be the work of a god.
Science can explain(partfully) , and the biggest scientists did explain, of Einstein Over Mark Twain to Newton....Ok, I cant say that we are not created from aliens, but for sure God create them..If you cant find the creator of your computer, that dont mean he dont exist, It would be silly to say that nobody did not create your computer..Btw. I hope you understand that Theory of evolution is not a fact... Peoples which believe in Darwinian evolution are believer, It is a faith, and if I may, blind faith for now.
QuoteScience can explain(partfully) , and the biggest scientists did explain, of Einstein Over Mark Twain to Newton....Ok, I cant say that we are not created from aliens, but for sure God create them..If you cant find the creator of your computer, that dont mean he dont exist, It would be silly to say that nobody did not create your computer..Btw. I hope you understand that Theory of evolution is not a fact... Peoples which believe in Darwinian evolution are believer, It is a faith, and if I may, blind faith for now. You have to be a troll right?If you don't believe in evolution, just look at parents around the world. Children resemble their parents in both looks and personality. If one child has a mutation for a certain 'talent' such as tallness or musicality, then their children will also have a high probability of carrying this gene. We have carbon dated human remains as early as 200 000 years ago. Assuming that each generation before us lived 16-20 years before reproducing we get at least200 000/18=11111.11 generations to have come before us. Over time, small evolutionary advantages ultimately resulted in the modern human. For example, the gene for lactase production used to switch off in adult humans. About 8000 years ago in Turkey humans began domesticating animals and drinking their milk. Adults who did not switch off their lactase enzyme in adulthood could continue to drink milk and received an evolutionary advantage (stronger bones, more energy, nutrients). Nowadays, most people are able to digest lactase well into adulthood. Evolution is an ongoing process.As rational beings we must consider the possibilities and produce theories which have strong internal symmetry and do not contradict scientific observations outright.It is possible, for example, that we live in a simulated universe.Do you know Conway's game of life? It is a zero player game that evolves based on the primary configuration of squares and a set of rules governing how the squares will behave on each round.In a way, our universe is not all that much different.The game still exists in our universe though and is ultimately governed by our laws. If our universe suddenly shut off, then Conway's game of life shuts off. Basically when it comes to simulated universe theory it boils down to:1)It is possible and logically explainable2)It is possible and not logically explainable3)It is not possibleObviously given that I have written an entire conjecture based on an independent framework of our universe I am hedging towards #3.
... from where came the first living thing?
A living thing(living being) is bacteria, or virus, or plants, animals, humans... Chemical reaction is not a live being but amoeba is..
A living thing ... is ... virus ...
Its already late now, so please just answer me on 2 questions:1. question is the first question of Darwinian evolution and it goes: from where came the first living thing?Before some peoples believes that from non-living things can be created a living thing, but that is WRONG. That is 1. question if we want to talk about evolution , micro or macro without a supreme Being2. question is: Do you know that Darwinian evolution is not a fact, it is just a theory.Let me quote Richard Dawkins:"Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, the lack of evidence." - Richard Dawkins "I believe, but cannot prove, that all life, all intelligence, all creativity and all "design" anywhere in the universe is the direct or indirect product of Darwinian natural selection." - Richard Dawkins"It follows that design comes late in the universe, after a period of Darwinian evolution. Design cannot precede evolution and therefore cannot underlie the universe." - Richard DawkinsIf Richard Dawkins admit , that this theory is blind faith, then you know whats time is You have to understand that God is required in science for full picture, because he is in picture and picture without him cannot be full... You should look at all facts equally and then you would understand....I know ,Einstein , Gallileo, Newton(all the biggest scientists ever did know about what talking )Or maybe they was the fools?