[guest39538]

einstein.jpg (26.04 kB . 259x194 - viewed 4177 times)


Understand I see symbols as words, it is just a language,

added- Einstein wanted one equation, Gods equation, so did I.
  p.s had to add some drama lol

My favourite videos of all time

You post a ridiculous jpeg like that  and wonder why people do not take you seriously?

Discussing science, does not mean you cannot joke and have  a bit of fun at the same time. 

[Bored chemist]

Its an abstraction it does not have to mean what the accepted symbols mean.

Unless you tell us what it means, it means nothing. Why waste the form's bandwidth with it?

[guest39538]

Its an abstraction it does not have to mean what the accepted symbols mean.

Unless you tell us what it means, it means nothing. Why waste the form's bandwidth with it?

It means what I have already explained.   

A mono-pole positive cannot exist so I have give this the value of 0

A mono-pole negative cannot exist so I have give this the value of 0

0+0=1 existence

In the mono pole matrice

A←→A

B←→B

[guest39538]

um.jpg (59.55 kB . 1914x922 - viewed 2107 times)

[Bored chemist]

A mono-pole negative cannot exist

You need to tell the electrons about that; they don't seem to have noticed.
And your so-called explanation makes no sense so it explains nothing.

(Don't try to blame me for that- it's your job to explain your  weird ideas)

[guest39538]

A mono-pole negative cannot exist

You need to tell the electrons about that; they don't seem to have noticed.
And your so-called explanation makes no sense so it explains nothing.

(Don't try to blame me for that- it's your job to explain your  weird ideas)

You are correct , it is my ''job'' to explain my weird ideas.  I even admit they are weird ideas.   The electron and proton exist in the model, but do they exist in reality? 

Let us start with an electron and work from there.  An electron is a negative polarity isn't it?

[guest39538]

So here is our electron matrice

[000]  = 2.82 x 10-15 m

Δx=F

F=likewise polarity

0←→0

How can an electron exist when all 0 points in the matrice are likewise in polarity?

P=0 and yes that one is probability.


added- maybe your language



U[000]+V[000]=U.V

[guest39538]

I perhaps should of watched Khan's introduction into a matrix before I started, but you know me I tend to do things backwards.

Anyway I learnt about the size of the Matrix   and now know my matrix is really small

0+0=1

A[]+B[]=1

Au=0
Bu=0

a 0*0 matrice.   added   ΔR³=A+B

I will investigate further into matrices i need to find out more.

[Bored chemist]

Let us start with an electron and work from there.  An electron is a negative polarity isn't it?

No
An electron has a negative charge.
The word "polarity" has a number of meanings, dependent on the context.
Since you are using it outside any of the established contexts you need to say what you are using the word to mean.

What is "polarity" in this context?

[Bored chemist]

but you know me I tend to do things backwards.

And you make an annoying fool of yourself by doing so. While you are at it you waste the forum's bandwidth and you run the risk of misleading people.
Why don't you stop?
Or at least put in a disclaimer pointing out that you really don't know what you are talking about.

0+0=1

No it isn't.
Not even with matrices.

[guest39538]

but you know me I tend to do things backwards.

And you make an annoying fool of yourself by doing so. While you are at it you waste the forum's bandwidth and you run the risk of misleading people.
Why don't you stop?
Or at least put in a disclaimer pointing out that you really don't know what you are talking about.

0+0=1

No it isn't.
Not even with matrices.

Do you realise that your negativity towards me and other negativity from other people is what is driving me to prove you all wrong?

I will get my maths correct eventually and show you that you are wrong, it is only a matter of time as I am getting close.

In a 0*0 matrix
[]+[]=1

I will prove this in time and then you negativity will account for nothing.

[guest39538]

Any maxwells on want to help me in a joint effort?

explain this matrices actions in maths please,
expansion u.jpg (47.01 kB . 1914x922 - viewed 2138 times)

Δ0=Δ1/t=1/k where k is space

[guest39538]

Operating on an Empty Matrix
The basic model for empty matrices is that any operation that is defined for m-by-n matrices, and that produces a result whose dimension is some function of m and n, should still be allowed when m or n is zero. The size of the result of this operation is consistent with the size of the result generated when working with nonempty values, but instead is evaluated at zero.

For example, horizontal concatenation

C = [A B]

I am sure I already did a+b=c    are people lying to me?

[Bored chemist]

Do you realise that your negativity towards me and other negativity from other people is what is driving me to prove you all wrong?

But you are not proving us wrong, you are proving yourself wrong.

BTW, you forgot to cite this quote (along with others)
"The basic model for empty matrices is that any operation that is defined for m-by-n matrices, and that produces a result whose dimension is some function of m and n, should still be allowed when m or n is zero."
And, more importantly, you failed to understand that it's from a programming language site which isn't quite the same usage as you would get from a mathematics site.

[guest39538]

but you know me I tend to do things backwards.

And you make an annoying fool of yourself by doing so. While you are at it you waste the forum's bandwidth and you run the risk of misleading people.
Why don't you stop?
Or at least put in a disclaimer pointing out that you really don't know what you are talking about.

0+0=1

No it isn't.
Not even with matrices.

Try this

A[]+A[1u]-A[1u]=A[]??

added - If I really want to learn something, I learn it!  You can read that can't you Mr Chemist?

[guest39538]

A ⇒ B

B[]+B[1u]-B[1u]=B[]

A+B=C

A[1u]+B[1u]=AB[1u]=C

[Bored chemist]

If I really want to learn something, I learn it!  You can read that can't you Mr Chemist?

I can read it.
I see no evidence of it.
You continue to post nonsense.
None of the terms you use
[]
[1u]
⇒
has been defined, so it's impossible to ascribe any meaning to your posts.

[guest39538]

If I really want to learn something, I learn it!  You can read that can't you Mr Chemist?

I can read it.
I see no evidence of it.
You continue to post nonsense.
None of the terms you use
[]
[1u]
⇒
has been defined, so it's impossible to ascribe any meaning to your posts.

OH come off it, you are good at this and know what the signs mean without me having to explain everything. 

an empty matrice []

1u is 1 internal energy

 A ⇒ B means if A is true then B is also true;

Would it  help if defined 1u as β−  or e- for B and  +1e for A?

[guest39538]

A[]+A[+1e]-A[+1e]=A[]

 A ⇒ B

B[]+B[β−]-B[β−]=B[]

A+B=C

A[+1e]+B[β−]=[AB]

[Bored chemist]

It would be a start if you learned to spell matrix.
Matrices don't have energy (internal or otherwise) and energy isn't a matrix.

"A ⇒ B means if A is true then B is also true"
OK, that's the conventional use of the symbol, but matrices don't imply anything, not are they implied by anything.
So none of your post makes sense.