0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: David Cooper on 11/06/2018 20:55:11Your problem would be finding a problem,When was first computer invented?The ENIAC was invented by J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly at the University of Pennsylvania and began construction in 1943 and was not completed until 1946. It occupied about 1,800 square feet and used about 18,000 vacuum tubes, weighing almost 50 tons.What did we ever do before there was computers? Obvious we did not survive before 1946 without them . Hang on a minute! we survived a measured 1946 years without them . Wheres your argument now?
Your problem would be finding a problem,
The time we spend at climbing is a lot longer than the time we spend at the summit, so we better like climbing.
You talk as if you didn't like the climbing, as if you weren't imagining much reward once at the summit, or as if you were imagining not even reaching it.
I hope you don't feel you are losing your time talking to me. :0)
Quote from: Thebox on 11/06/2018 21:37:31Quote from: David Cooper on 11/06/2018 20:55:11Your problem would be finding a problem,When was first computer invented?The ENIAC was invented by J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly at the University of Pennsylvania and began construction in 1943 and was not completed until 1946. It occupied about 1,800 square feet and used about 18,000 vacuum tubes, weighing almost 50 tons.What did we ever do before there was computers? Obvious we did not survive before 1946 without them . Hang on a minute! we survived a measured 1946 years without them . Wheres your argument now? Who and whose argument? I can't work out what you think you've undermined.
Your argument? You are ''arguing'' it would be good to have a super Ai running the world aren't you ? Am I misunderstanding your ''argument''?
is remove the need for us to do work that we don't want to do,
I really like that scenario but wouldn't that see a fall of capitalism ? I mean who owns the robots and what would people have to trade for goods if they weren't earning money ?
Quote from: Thebox on 12/06/2018 23:04:36I really like that scenario but wouldn't that see a fall of capitalism ? I mean who owns the robots and what would people have to trade for goods if they weren't earning money ?It doesn't matter who owns the robots - the work they're doing is not work done by the owners, so the owners can be forced to pay 99.99999% tax on their earnings (after costs), and that tax money becomes the source of an income for everyone. It will then be up to each person to spend wisely. There will also be environmental taxes to punish anything damaging and to counter that damage. This will be a triumph of capitalism and of communism, and the two things will merge into the combination of both that they should always have been.
Feelings are impossible to code, so an AI would have to simulate empathy and sadness if it had to show some, the same as if you had to show empathy to a bored chemist. :0)
I think we are all fundamentally selfish, so maybe we are all hiding it when we show some empathy after all, which means that we might only be simulating it the same way a computer would have to.
It is certainly selfish to hope that your children will feel good to think about you.
Of course it is, otherwise you wouldn't wait for a recognition.
Selfishness invites us to build groups, because groups are better for our own survival, but it has the side effect of feeling good, a feeling that we attribute to what we do for the group, which is empathetic. I always feel ambivalent when I thank people or when people thank me, and I think it is because I consider it is still a selfish move.
Grumpy attitude? I simply don't need to comment on things that are right, so it's a continual stream of posts pointing out errors. You'll get the same from AGI, and it won't be grumpy either.