[opportunity]

My last paper so far is perhaps one of my worst.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1807.0215v2.pdf

It was terrible.

I'll probably upload a better grammatical thing. I was thrown by results I couldn't at the time, a few months ago, explain (and here I refer to object/s that defy normal inertial physics under a certain field influence). I failed to recognise a feature of the theory that is integral to the process of proof. So, I'm explaining that with paper 8. Hopefully within a week or 2 I'll post it.....provided I don't lose myself on a new plot of discovery.

This theory has so many callings, its hard to stay put and document. I'm surprised no one else has decided to jump in.

The last paper, paper 9, well....it explains how to use a philosophical "plug in" to the idea of time and space......a code of philosophy....Maybe by xmas....it's perhaps something I'm still debating about offering, but, I think it has a poetry of its own that, well, is either horrific or welcome.


The theory of everything is already around us...evidence is evidence...we see, we hear, what we see and hear....yet what is the logic codex that brings us to bargain with the greater process of reality to want to have the ability to change things in the greater scheme that always has the final say...? That's philosophy, yet its science too.

[opportunity]

The good thing about forums is that one can document their journey of correspondence.


How bad would that be if thats all there was for someone?

We all know that physics has always provided the best stuff.....weapons, you name it.

What does physics want with a new idea? A 5* invitation?

[Paradigmer (OP)]

What is physics without new ideas shed by the positive light of interest of others with new possible solutions to age old problems?

I mulled over to respond to one of your disappeared post in this thread concerning new ideas. Did you recently delete that post?

p.s. Am up to my neck at the moment, and also needs lots of time and efforts with my pea brain to be able to respond to your other posts if at all. Kindly excuse me if I have gone quiet for a while. Thanks for understanding.

[opportunity]

I deleted a post shortly after posting it as it gave a fairly negative view of how physics politicises their adoption of ideas; I can't use a negative approach, its a bad habit we are all guilty of that I need to keep in check regarding my work.

Understood that you're busy like me. I'll send you a link of the next paper when its up.

[Paradigmer (OP)]

I deleted a post shortly after posting it as it gave a fairly negative view of how physics politicises their adoption of ideas; I can't use a negative approach, its a bad habit we are all guilty of that I need to keep in check regarding my work.

Noted. Once you done copying the links (if you wish) of my last post, I would delete it.

The negative approach is indeed a bad habit.

[Paradigmer (OP)]

My last paper so far is perhaps one of my worst.http://vixra.org/pdf/1807.0215v2.pdfIt was terrible.

You can't beat me on this. I had lost count of the number of times I faced palm when I looked back at some of my writings for the UVS treatise.

You have neatly keep tracks for the variations of your papers, which are your personal dairy research journal necessary for proof of development, etc. I couldn't be bothered anymore, and so simply present the UVS treatise in its latest updated form, only periodically make archival copies that are not for public reaching. 

Interestingly in paper 1, using the doubling Fibonacci algorithm for time, the Rydberg equation for the atom becomes apparent, and that's the point I realised I really had something, so thus really went hammer and tong with the remaining papers.

Such motivations to go hammer and tong, is priceless.

The theory of everything is already around us...evidence is evidence...we see, we hear, what we see and hear....yet what is the logic codex that brings us to bargain with the greater process of reality to want to have the ability to change things in the greater scheme that always has the final say...? That's philosophy, yet its science too.

I agree, and nicely put. All the best to your upcoming paper.