[Yahya (OP)]

I don't see anything revolutionary about it, so I'm going to have to say no.

Then you evaluated the idea to have a decision  , according to your evaluation does it solve climate change problem? if it solves climate change problem then why it is not great ?

[Kryptid]

I don't see anything revolutionary about it, so I'm going to have to say no.

Then you evaluated the idea to have a decision  , according to your evaluation does it solve climate change problem?

No.

[Yahya (OP)]

I don't see anything revolutionary about it, so I'm going to have to say no.

Then you evaluated the idea to have a decision  , according to your evaluation does it solve climate change problem?

No.

The clockwork tool is unique and genius ,and I might  have found a new method for it. So what about my new method ?

[Yahya (OP)]

I don't see anything revolutionary about it, so I'm going to have to say no.

Then you evaluated the idea to have a decision  , according to your evaluation does it solve climate change problem?

No.

The clockwork tool is unique and genius ,and I might  have found a new method for it. So what about my new method ?

could I conclude that you agree that this is a great invention?

[Bored chemist]

could I conclude that you agree that this is a great invention?

Not if you were sane.

[Bored chemist]

I don't see anything revolutionary about it, so I'm going to have to say no.

Then you evaluated the idea to have a decision  , according to your evaluation does it solve climate change problem?

No.

The clockwork tool is unique and genius ,and I might  have found a new method for it. So what about my new method ?

It's not new, it's not genius it's not even particularly helpful.

[Yahya (OP)]

I don't see anything revolutionary about it, so I'm going to have to say no.

Then you evaluated the idea to have a decision  , according to your evaluation does it solve climate change problem?

No.

The clockwork tool is unique and genius ,and I might  have found a new method for it. So what about my new method ?

It's not new, it's not genius it's not even particularly helpful.

I thought you agreed about the concept

[Yahya (OP)]

could I conclude that you agree that this is a great invention?

Not if you were sane.

Then what is the reason for the stop of discussion?

[Kryptid]

could I conclude that you agree that this is a great invention?

I never said that. Don't put words in my mouth.

Then what is the reason for the stop of discussion?

Because I'm tired of talking about it. It's a futile discussion.

[Yahya (OP)]

could I conclude that you agree that this is a great invention?

It's a futile discussion.

No it is not  , you just can't point out any flaws on my new method nor Bored Chemist can

[Bored chemist]

Then what is the reason for the stop of discussion?

You asked a question
"Is this a great invention ?"
The question has been answered.- As it happens, the answer is no, it's not a great invention.
There is no point to further discussion.

Please stop wasting time on this daft idea.

I thought you agreed about the concept

How did you think I agreed about it when I said it was daft and told you to stop wasting time on it?

[Bored chemist]

No it is not  , you just can't point out any flaws on my new method nor Bored Chemist can

I did point out flaws in it.

That's pretty much lifting it into space.

However there are Lithium batteries used for large scale power storage
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/sep/15/californias-big-battery-experiment-a-turning-point-for-energy-storage

So your claim is just not true.
Please don't repeat it.

In the mean time you plan to haul a battleship sized weight up and down the biggest hole the world has ever made.

[Yahya (OP)]

No it is not  , you just can't point out any flaws on my new method nor Bored Chemist can

I did point out flaws in it.

That's pretty much lifting it into space.

However there are Lithium batteries used for large scale power storage
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/sep/15/californias-big-battery-experiment-a-turning-point-for-energy-storage

So your claim is just not true.
Please don't repeat it.

In the mean time you plan to haul a battleship sized weight up and down the biggest hole the world has ever made.

This was about  using weight but the new method doesn't have flaws you just don't want to admit it.

[Bored chemist]

No it is not  , you just can't point out any flaws on my new method nor Bored Chemist can

I did point out flaws in it.

That's pretty much lifting it into space.

However there are Lithium batteries used for large scale power storage
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/sep/15/californias-big-battery-experiment-a-turning-point-for-energy-storage

So your claim is just not true.
Please don't repeat it.

In the mean time you plan to haul a battleship sized weight up and down the biggest hole the world has ever made.

This was about  using weight but the new method doesn't have flaws you just don't want to admit it.

Do you mean the "new method" that involves making a hydrogen balloon  a thousand time bigger than the world's biggest building and which, when it burned, would release roughly the same energy as the whole world's nuclear arsenal?

I pointed out flaws about that too.

[Yahya (OP)]

No it is not  , you just can't point out any flaws on my new method nor Bored Chemist can

I did point out flaws in it.

That's pretty much lifting it into space.

However there are Lithium batteries used for large scale power storage
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/sep/15/californias-big-battery-experiment-a-turning-point-for-energy-storage

So your claim is just not true.
Please don't repeat it.

In the mean time you plan to haul a battleship sized weight up and down the biggest hole the world has ever made.

This was about  using weight but the new method doesn't have flaws you just don't want to admit it.

Do you mean the "new method" that involves making a hydrogen balloon  a thousand time bigger than the world's biggest building and which, when it burned, would release roughly the same energy as the whole world's nuclear arsenal?

I pointed out flaws about that too.

not this too, my new method I mean is using what is similar to a waterwheel and use artificial reservoir water energy as mass times height .

[Bored chemist]

So, your new "improved" waterwheel that's not really an improvement on the current versions (of a 2500 year old design).
I pointed out the flaw in that too-you seem to think it's a perpetual motion machine.

[Yahya (OP)]

So, your new "improved" waterwheel that's not really an improvement on the current versions (of a 2500 year old design).
I pointed out the flaw in that too-you seem to think it's a perpetual motion machine.

it is not a perpetual motion machine, I posted in the original thread.

[Bored chemist]

So, your new "improved" waterwheel that's not really an improvement on the current versions (of a 2500 year old design).
I pointed out the flaw in that too-you seem to think it's a perpetual motion machine.

it is not a perpetual motion machine, I posted in the original thread.

You didn't understand that you were claiming a perpetual motion machine, but that doesn't stop it being impossible.

[Yahya (OP)]

So, your new "improved" waterwheel that's not really an improvement on the current versions (of a 2500 year old design).
I pointed out the flaw in that too-you seem to think it's a perpetual motion machine.

it is not a perpetual motion machine, I posted in the original thread.

You didn't understand that you were claiming a perpetual motion machine, but that doesn't stop it being impossible.

what I am proposing is much higher than your weak understanding

[Bored chemist]

what I am proposing is much higher than your weak understanding

One of us has "weak" understanding.
The other has Kryptid and Alan on their side.
How do you get to be so conceited as to think that you are right and everyone else is wrong?

Well, you will learn who has a "weak understanding" of things when you try to get any sort of funding.