0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
One of us has "weak" understanding.
What did you do?
Lithium ion batteries store something of the order of 200 watt hours per kilogram.About 700 KJ/KgTo get that energy storage density by raising a weight against gravity you need to lift it 70km.That's pretty much lifting it into space.
Quote from: Yahya on 17/06/2018 10:54:58lithium-ion battery won't store energy at grid scale It already does.https://www.tesla.com/en_GB/powerwall
lithium-ion battery won't store energy at grid scale
Quote from: Yahya on 14/07/2018 07:47:25No it is not , you just can't point out any flaws on my new method nor Bored Chemist canI did point out flaws in it.Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/06/2018 09:39:45That's pretty much lifting it into space.Quote from: Bored chemist on 19/06/2018 21:48:32However there are Lithium batteries used for large scale power storagehttps://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/sep/15/californias-big-battery-experiment-a-turning-point-for-energy-storageSo your claim is just not true.Please don't repeat it.Quote from: Bored chemist on 07/07/2018 21:32:53In the mean time you plan to haul a battleship sized weight up and down the biggest hole the world has ever made.
No it is not , you just can't point out any flaws on my new method nor Bored Chemist can
That's pretty much lifting it into space.
However there are Lithium batteries used for large scale power storagehttps://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/sep/15/californias-big-battery-experiment-a-turning-point-for-energy-storageSo your claim is just not true.Please don't repeat it.
In the mean time you plan to haul a battleship sized weight up and down the biggest hole the world has ever made.
Quote from: Yahya on 14/07/2018 17:31:23Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/07/2018 16:36:04So, your new "improved" waterwheel that's not really an improvement on the current versions (of a 2500 year old design).I pointed out the flaw in that too-you seem to think it's a perpetual motion machine.it is not a perpetual motion machine, I posted in the original thread.You didn't understand that you were claiming a perpetual motion machine, but that doesn't stop it being impossible.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/07/2018 16:36:04So, your new "improved" waterwheel that's not really an improvement on the current versions (of a 2500 year old design).I pointed out the flaw in that too-you seem to think it's a perpetual motion machine.it is not a perpetual motion machine, I posted in the original thread.
So, your new "improved" waterwheel that's not really an improvement on the current versions (of a 2500 year old design).I pointed out the flaw in that too-you seem to think it's a perpetual motion machine.
Quote from: Yahya on 22/07/2018 10:05:49What did you do?I pointed out that you were wrong.
or about a detailed idea to solve climate change problem
You didn't,
solving climate change problem shows ultra high intelligence
solving climate change problem shows ultra high intelligence but the invention shows high intelligence.
I invented a new storage tool that shows my high intelligence, that it is better than Davinci's car, it could goes for several kilometers using a spring and is possible to be invented at that time , supposing it is not the best storage tool but it stores energy and it works.
Not solving climate change that show my intelligence but the invention itself.
If you are so sure that your idea will work, then why are you even discussing this with us? You should be talking to people who are capable of actually building this thing instead.
How can I find those people who are capable of actually building it ?
Quote from: Yahya on 23/07/2018 06:12:57How can I find those people who are capable of actually building it ?I'm sure power companies have websites. Maybe you should try E-mailing them.
I think they need a prototype, don't they ?
Quote from: Yahya on 23/07/2018 06:36:33I think they need a prototype, don't they ?Having never done anything like that myself, I wouldn't know. You could probably find someone willing to build it for you if you paid them for it.
I don't have enough money
Quote from: Yahya on 23/07/2018 06:50:14I don't have enough moneyThen you'll have to learn how to build it yourself. Otherwise, I doubt anything is going to materialize.
You could build a scale model as a proof of concept. It would need to be fairly large to give a good indication of workings.
I would love to see a small machine that has fan rotates and weight which falls down very slowly to rotate the fan, and works such way for hours.
Quote from: Kryptid on 23/07/2018 06:25:50Quote from: Yahya on 23/07/2018 06:12:57How can I find those people who are capable of actually building it ?I'm sure power companies have websites. Maybe you should try E-mailing them.I think they need a prototype, don't they ?
Quote from: Yahya on 23/07/2018 06:36:33Quote from: Kryptid on 23/07/2018 06:25:50Quote from: Yahya on 23/07/2018 06:12:57How can I find those people who are capable of actually building it ?I'm sure power companies have websites. Maybe you should try E-mailing them.I think they need a prototype, don't they ?If it was actually a good idea they would build a prototype (or get it built).Why wouldn't they? It's perhaps a few hundred pounds worth of work which s nothing for a large company, and if you were right, the return on investment would be huge.Good luck.