The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Does Stokes' theorem equality produces the right results?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Does Stokes' theorem equality produces the right results?

  • 25 Replies
  • 9939 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Does Stokes' theorem equality produces the right results?
« Reply #20 on: 08/05/2019 22:22:10 »
It hardly matters what order you do it in
Take F
Differentiate it using curl
integrate it
That takes you back to something with the same units as F
Then integrate it again.
That gets you something in units of "integrated F"

On the other side of the equation, you integrate F
That gets you something in units of "integrated F"

I'm not qualified to say if they are the same thing (except to say- of course they are it's a mathematical theorem).
But they clearly have the same units.

You should stop preaching about this.

Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Re: Does Stokes' theorem equality produces the right results?
« Reply #21 on: 08/05/2019 22:34:51 »
The definition of madness is repeating the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. No matter how many times you argue that everyone else is wrong it won't make you right. Just picking random topics and arguing against them doesn't make you smart. If you want to waste your time that way go right ahead. But  you may well soon be arguing with yourself.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline alright1234 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 163
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Does Stokes' theorem equality produces the right results?
« Reply #22 on: 23/05/2019 00:22:26 »
The area integral has precedence, The result of an integral is a length, area or volume. I my opinion any other application is false since Eudoxus (b. 390 BC) discovered that the area of a circle is proportional to the radius squared, and, Archimedes (b. 212 BC) derived the area equation for a circle using pi which was the most advance mathematics of the time. Determine the exact area of an equation was monumental achievement that modern physicists are attempting to destroy.
Logged
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: Does Stokes' theorem equality produces the right results?
« Reply #23 on: 23/05/2019 09:17:40 »
Quote from: alright1234 on 23/05/2019 00:22:26
The result of an integral is a length, area or volume. I my opinion any other application is false since Eudoxus (b. 390 BC) 
Sorry, but science and maths have moved on since then. Important you keep up to date and don’t post false information.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Does Stokes' theorem equality produces the right results?
« Reply #24 on: 23/05/2019 19:46:09 »
Quote from: alright1234 on 23/05/2019 00:22:26
Determine the exact area of an equation was monumental achievement that modern physicists are attempting to destroy.
Can you clarify how scientists, who use calculus  every day are undermining calculus?


Quote from: alright1234 on 23/05/2019 00:22:26
I my opinion any other application is false
Get a better opinion.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21135
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Does Stokes' theorem equality produces the right results?
« Reply #25 on: 24/05/2019 19:22:48 »
Quote from: alright1234 on 23/05/2019 00:22:26
The result of an integral is a length, area or volume.
Obviously not. The time integral of acceleration is velocity, as every driver knows. The time integral of replication rate is population. The triple spatial integral of obtuseness is a waste of space.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.306 seconds with 42 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.