The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
General Discussion & Feedback
Just Chat!
Has a logical presumption misled science from a definition of gravity/creation?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Has a logical presumption misled science from a definition of gravity/creation?
2 Replies
1151 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
rstormview
(OP)
Full Member
67
Activity:
0%
Has a logical presumption misled science from a definition of gravity/creation?
«
on:
26/02/2021 18:00:28 »
A SCIENCE BASED HYPOTHESIS OF GRAVITY AND CREATION.
HAS A VERY LOGICAL PRESUMPTION MISDIRECTED SCIENCE DOWN A CUL-DE-SAC?
Suggested below is the error that veered science away from the logical physics of Galileo and Newton. The simple inversion of a scientific presumption gives us the missing definition of gravity that eluded Einstein, restores to physics the logical world of Galileo and Newton and, surprisingly, signposting much much more besides.
_____A New Definition of Gravity, Black Holes and Dark Matter?___
An Alternative Definition of Gravity
The hypothesis below proposes an inversion of an accepted and unchallenged assumption, but overall it is scientifically logical.
The Eureka moment came from an inversion of one of sciences many presumptions and everything fell provocatively into place.
Observation noted electrons streaming towards protons and the obvious conclusion is that protons attract. If protons attract electrons why do they fail to hit and become absorbed? What is not well defined is how this proton attraction somehow reverses into repulsion in close proximity and directs electrons into orbiting protons to create hydrogen.
The proposal for consideration is that it is electrons that attract, but with relatively insignificant mass, it is electrons that do the moving, homing for a stability. Therefore the logical proposal is, in close proximity homing electrons are repelled by protons into circulatory orbits to endlessly create hydrogen, the basic most prolific atom of the Universe.
If the Big Bang spewed out swirls of electrons to create Suns/Stars it leads logically to the proposal that gravity is the attractive force of a swirl of electrons held en mass by its own gravity; modest in the molten interior of Earth, massive in our Sun.
It is further proposed for consideration the Big Bang also caused swirl concentrations of protons and neutrons. So, by association, the above proposal further suggests there might be swirled concentrations of protons or neutrons which may explain the unsolved mysterious black holes and dark matter.
If this proposed inversion becomes proven experimentally, the logical science of Galileo and Newton is restored.
The infinite endless creation of Hydrogen throughout infinity leads logically to consider:-
TIME BEFORE THE BIG BANG?
Preface
Below is the only proposition (I am aware of) that hypothesizes ‘Time’ before ‘The Big Bang’, and how the Big Bang amassed enough matter to furnish the world in which we have evolved.
Wikipedia, ‘The consensus among scientists, astronomers and cosmologists is that the Universe, as we know it, was created in a massive explosion that not only created the majority of matter, but the physical laws that govern our ever-expanding cosmos. This is known as the Big Bang Theory’.
Can explosions create matter? The accepted chemistry of explosions is that explosions do not create matter; they just transmute it - mostly into heat. Therefore this ‘consensus of opinion’, unchallenged, unproven is a working hypothesis, not a proof. If explosions do not create matter, something did.
Infinity is a difficult concept for Homo sapiens to grasp. Within infinity anything seems possible. Within infinity, dinosaurs evolved on planet Earth and ruled unchallenged for 160,000,000 years! An asteroid hit caused a climate change disaster and one hundred and sixty million years of evolution was wiped out almost overnight.
Within the subsequent sixty million years many different types of creatures began to evolve. Apes were one of the lucky inheritors of the dinosaur’s disaster and over the recent 300,000 years Homo sapiens evolved intelligence enough to investigate our universe.
A UNIFYING THEORY
There cannot be nothing. Within infinity there must have been something. It is proposed this ‘something’ is the same electromagnetic field of oscillations on multiple frequencies in every dimension and every direction that our radio and television use to communicate today. It is further proposed that Infinity and the electromagnetic field are different names for the same thing.
It is proposed infinity before the Big Bang was an electromagnetic field of oscillations - precisely as the night sky cosmos as we see it, but empty of all substance
Within this field of oscillation, it is proposed atoms became created from the precise collisions of frequencies from every direction which momentarily arrested the speed of light.
A precise collision of frequencies at the positive peaks spewed out protons.
The precise collision of frequencies at the negative peaks created electrons.
The precise collision of frequencies at zero peaks produced neutrons.
Electrons and protons combined naturally to create hydrogen, the basic element in the universe. The addition of neutron into the formula created helium.
Within infinity’s billions upon billions upon billions of years, hydrogen and helium were being continuously created until hydrogen suffused our electromagnetic field (suffused infinity). It is proposed within infinite space and infinite time, the continual and unrestricted growth of this concentration of hydrogen led eventually and inevitably to cause the temperature of infinity to heat from its own gravity or a nuclear fusion to reach the auto-ignition point of Hydrogen.
Since an atom of hydrogen has a mass of about 1.66 x 10(-24) grams, and a MOLE of hydrogen atoms weighs only 1.008 grams, for the core temperature of hydrogen suffusing infinity to reach the flashpoint of hydrogen, +565.5C, by its own gravity or nuclear fusion, the Big Bang must have been fuelled with material from a hydrogen concentration of infinite size - which billions upon billions of years was able to provide.
This combustion regurgitated this gigantic amount of matter into the cosmos - enough matter to furnish the universe in which we have evolved.
The resultant explosive interactions from heat, gravity, velocity reacting with inert helium introduced variety into primal universal equations which caused more complex assortments of matter to evolve. Swirls of electrons subsided into suns/stars and residue material formed planets, et cetera; a swirl of hydrogen and helium created planet Jupiter.
As science stands at the moment, gravity and the Big Bang are accepted as unexplained, ill-defined ‘absolutes’ without scientific definition.
Therefore, it is proposed our universe was not the creation of a superior intelligence, but is a logical and inevitable creation of an electromagnetic field operating within infinite space and infinite time - endlessly creating hydrogen which gathered into a suffusion of infinite size which ultimately and inevitably exploded, spewing a near infinite amount of matter into infinity that created the universe into which, after more billions of years, Homo sapiens evolved.
Rstormview@hotmail.com
The Proof?
Our human obsession with music and dance is the unconscious recognition of our rhythmic oscillatory roots.
Postscript.
Should the above hypothesis become accepted for research, there are many interesting possibilities:
• If the innate compulsion of electrons to attach is researched and established, it might explain the millions of very different life forms on the planet. The property of homing electrons to seek out and find stability may alter a DNA into developing another unique branch of life.
• Chinese philosopher Sun Yat-Sen claimed ‘Western religions are just theories of the meaning of life dressed up in creed, cant and ceremonial; that the Chinese nation has successfully negotiated 8000 years without a theory of God’.
• If the original hypothesis of the innate property of electrons is to home into stability is established, then the Haldron Collider experiment may not detect different origins of sub-atomic particles.
• Quantum may be just a splint; useful for fractured logic until something more scientific becomes discovered.
Logged
rstormview
(OP)
Full Member
67
Activity:
0%
Has a logical presumption misled science from a definition of gravity/creation?
«
Reply #1 on:
26/02/2021 18:02:33 »
A SCIENCE BASED HYPOTHESIS OF GRAVITY AND CREATION.
HAS A VERY LOGICAL PRESUMPTION MISDIRECTED SCIENCE DOWN A CUL-DE-SAC?
Suggested below is the error that veered science away from the logical physics of Galileo and Newton. The simple inversion of a scientific presumption gives us the missing definition of gravity that eluded Einstein, restores to physics the logical world of Galileo and Newton and, surprisingly, signposting much much more besides.
_____A New Definition of Gravity, Black Holes and Dark Matter?___
An Alternative Definition of Gravity
The hypothesis below proposes an inversion of an accepted and unchallenged assumption, but overall it is scientifically logical.
The Eureka moment came from an inversion of one of sciences many presumptions and everything fell provocatively into place.
Observation noted electrons streaming towards protons and the obvious conclusion is that protons attract. If protons attract electrons why do they fail to hit and become absorbed? What is not well defined is how this proton attraction somehow reverses into repulsion in close proximity and directs electrons into orbiting protons to create hydrogen.
The proposal for consideration is that it is electrons that attract, but with relatively insignificant mass, it is electrons that do the moving, homing for a stability. Therefore the logical proposal is, in close proximity homing electrons are repelled by protons into circulatory orbits to endlessly create hydrogen, the basic most prolific atom of the Universe.
If the Big Bang spewed out swirls of electrons to create Suns/Stars it leads logically to the proposal that gravity is the attractive force of a swirl of electrons held en mass by its own gravity; modest in the molten interior of Earth, massive in our Sun.
It is further proposed for consideration the Big Bang also caused swirl concentrations of protons and neutrons. So, by association, the above proposal further suggests there might be swirled concentrations of protons or neutrons which may explain the unsolved mysterious black holes and dark matter.
If this proposed inversion becomes proven experimentally, the logical science of Galileo and Newton is restored.
The infinite endless creation of Hydrogen throughout infinity leads logically to consider:-
TIME BEFORE THE BIG BANG?
Preface
Below is the only proposition (I am aware of) that hypothesizes ‘Time’ before ‘The Big Bang’, and how the Big Bang amassed enough matter to furnish the world in which we have evolved.
Wikipedia, ‘The consensus among scientists, astronomers and cosmologists is that the Universe, as we know it, was created in a massive explosion that not only created the majority of matter, but the physical laws that govern our ever-expanding cosmos. This is known as the Big Bang Theory’.
Can explosions create matter? The accepted chemistry of explosions is that explosions do not create matter; they just transmute it - mostly into heat. Therefore this ‘consensus of opinion’, unchallenged, unproven is a working hypothesis, not a proof. If explosions do not create matter, something did.
Infinity is a difficult concept for Homo sapiens to grasp. Within infinity anything seems possible. Within infinity, dinosaurs evolved on planet Earth and ruled unchallenged for 160,000,000 years! An asteroid hit caused a climate change disaster and one hundred and sixty million years of evolution was wiped out almost overnight.
Within the subsequent sixty million years many different types of creatures began to evolve. Apes were one of the lucky inheritors of the dinosaur’s disaster and over the recent 300,000 years Homo sapiens evolved intelligence enough to investigate our universe.
A UNIFYING THEORY
There cannot be nothing. Within infinity there must have been something. It is proposed this ‘something’ is the same electromagnetic field of oscillations on multiple frequencies in every dimension and every direction that our radio and television use to communicate today. It is further proposed that Infinity and the electromagnetic field are different names for the same thing.
It is proposed infinity before the Big Bang was an electromagnetic field of oscillations - precisely as the night sky cosmos as we see it, but empty of all substance
Within this field of oscillation, it is proposed atoms became created from the precise collisions of frequencies from every direction which momentarily arrested the speed of light.
A precise collision of frequencies at the positive peaks spewed out protons.
The precise collision of frequencies at the negative peaks created electrons.
The precise collision of frequencies at zero peaks produced neutrons.
Electrons and protons combined naturally to create hydrogen, the basic element in the universe. The addition of neutron into the formula created helium.
Within infinity’s billions upon billions upon billions of years, hydrogen and helium were being continuously created until hydrogen suffused our electromagnetic field (suffused infinity). It is proposed within infinite space and infinite time, the continual and unrestricted growth of this concentration of hydrogen led eventually and inevitably to cause the temperature of infinity to heat from its own gravity or a nuclear fusion to reach the auto-ignition point of Hydrogen.
Since an atom of hydrogen has a mass of about 1.66 x 10(-24) grams, and a MOLE of hydrogen atoms weighs only 1.008 grams, for the core temperature of hydrogen suffusing infinity to reach the flashpoint of hydrogen, +565.5C, by its own gravity or nuclear fusion, the Big Bang must have been fuelled with material from a hydrogen concentration of infinite size - which billions upon billions of years was able to provide.
This combustion regurgitated this gigantic amount of matter into the cosmos - enough matter to furnish the universe in which we have evolved.
The resultant explosive interactions from heat, gravity, velocity reacting with inert helium introduced variety into primal universal equations which caused more complex assortments of matter to evolve. Swirls of electrons subsided into suns/stars and residue material formed planets, et cetera; a swirl of hydrogen and helium created planet Jupiter.
As science stands at the moment, gravity and the Big Bang are accepted as unexplained, ill-defined ‘absolutes’ without scientific definition.
Therefore, it is proposed our universe was not the creation of a superior intelligence, but is a logical and inevitable creation of an electromagnetic field operating within infinite space and infinite time - endlessly creating hydrogen which gathered into a suffusion of infinite size which ultimately and inevitably exploded, spewing a near infinite amount of matter into infinity that created the universe into which, after more billions of years, Homo sapiens evolved.
Rstormview@hotmail.com
The Proof?
Our human obsession with music and dance is the unconscious recognition of our rhythmic oscillatory roots.
Postscript.
Should the above hypothesis become accepted for research, there are many interesting possibilities:
• If the innate compulsion of electrons to attach is researched and established, it might explain the millions of very different life forms on the planet. The property of homing electrons to seek out and find stability may alter a DNA into developing another unique branch of life.
• Chinese philosopher Sun Yat-Sen claimed ‘Western religions are just theories of the meaning of life dressed up in creed, cant and ceremonial; that the Chinese nation has successfully negotiated 8000 years without a theory of God’.
• If the original hypothesis of the innate property of electrons is to home into stability is established, then the Haldron Collider experiment may not detect different origins of sub-atomic particles.
• Quantum may be just a splint; useful for fractured logic until something more scientific becomes discovered.
Logged
Bored chemist
Naked Science Forum GOD!
30406
Activity:
22%
Thanked: 1222 times
Re: Has a logical presumption misled science from a definition of gravity/creation?
«
Reply #2 on:
26/02/2021 18:19:40 »
Still no
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=77742.msg583115#msg583115
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...