[Kartazion (OP)]

Do you think the gravitational oscillator would not have a sinusoidal plot of displacement VS time?

Which gravitational oscillator? Mine?

[Origin]

Which gravitational oscillator? Mine?

Yes.

[Kartazion (OP)]

The gravitational singularity represents the anharmonic plot of the potential well (orange part). But thanks to its singularity avoidance by kinetic energy, the plot tends towards harmonicity.

[Kartazion (OP)]

IOW the greater the kinetics of the particle in its oscillation, the more the representation of the potential well tends towards harmonicity by gravitational singularity avoidance at x=0. If the kinetics of the particle are low, then the particle tends to fall into this singularity and traces the anharmonicity of the potential well.

Kinetics of the particle at the bottom of the potential well, and avoidance of the singularity:





At x = 0 when the particle is going faster (don't rely on GIF for speed), its kinetic energy allows it not to fall into the singularity.

[Kartazion (OP)]

After that I also published this:

"Dark matter can be explained by the quantum vacuum of quantum chromodynamics" Gilles Cohen-Tannoudji, French physicist. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilles_Cohen-Tannoudji

Here is a more subtle explanation to explain dark matter and quantum vacuum and quantum chromodynamics in relation to the oscillator.

Based on how the anharmonic oscillator mechanism works, the particle's path goes through different physical stages. First it would be fair to speak of the energy flow of the particle to express dark matter and of quantum vacuum. The particle would oscillate rapidly in the vicinity of the singularity (dark matter and more quantum vacuum) and in a second time more slowly in the vicinity of the matter (chromodynamics). In this case of large displacement, where the particle oscillate rapidly, it becomes an energy flow expressed by the quantum vacuum. The convergence of the energy flow of the quantum vacuum, in a smaller space, close to the singularity, then in turn becomes dark matter. At its opposite, there is the matter expressed by quantum chromodynamics.

Quantum chromodynamics would only be a duplication of the particle itself. To be continued.

[Kartazion (OP)]

The previous description uses the axion to simulate the Axion dark matter and the QCD Axion Dark Matter.

Quantum ChromoDynamics effects produce an effective periodic potential in which the axion field moves. The oscillations of the axion field about the minimum of the effective potential, the so-called misalignment mechanism, generate a cosmological population of cold axions with an abundance depending on the mass of the axion. With a mass above 10−11 times the electron mass, axions could account for dark matter, thus be both a dark-matter candidate and a solution to the strong CP problem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion

[Kartazion (OP)]

Quantum chromodynamics, and the reality of observation.

Quantum chromodynamics is the alternation of the particle itself to constitute the different quarks.

We can consider that this experience of obvervation is rare. On the other hand, if this is not observed, then the collapse of the wave function is irrelevant. This implies that the probability of the particle being in the combination of a proton or neutron is low. It belongs to the discipline of quantum decoherence where the particle is superimposed everywhere at the same time since there is only one. During the observation, an effort is to ask the quantum system to seriously position the combination of the particle. This is the preferred expression I would use to define what has just been described here: “I like to think the moon is there even if I am not looking at it.” Albert Einstein.

[Bored chemist]

Quote from: Bored chemist on 02/12/2021 19:21:18
What you need to provide is a real explanation which says .
"Antimatter/ matter oscillation  and gravitational oscillation are linked because..."
Just fill in where I left the ... .
Unless you are providing an explanation like that, you are not doing science, you are just wasting time.

[Kartazion (OP)]

Quote from: Bored chemist on 02/12/2021 19:21:18
What you need to provide is a real explanation which says .
"Antimatter/ matter oscillation  and gravitational oscillation are linked because..."
Just fill in where I left the ... .
Unless you are providing an explanation like that, you are not doing science, you are just wasting time.

It's a question of primary school that.

Antimatter/ matter oscillation  and gravitational oscillation are linked because the particle oscillates in the direction of the vector of gravity and is undergoing in one of the two directions either an acceleration or a slowing down.

[Bored chemist]

Antimatter/ matter oscillation  and gravitational oscillation are linked because the particle oscillates in the direction of the vector of gravity and is undergoing in one of the two directions either an acceleration or a slowing down.

You keep saying two things.
Thing 1 Particles oscillate
Thing 2 a rock dropped through the centre of the earth would oscillate

But that is not the same as saying that thing 1 causes thing 2.
A bee's wings oscillate, but that isn't the explanation of antimatter.

[Kartazion (OP)]

You keep saying two things.
Thing 1 Particles oscillate
Thing 2 a rock dropped through the centre of the earth would oscillate

But that is not the same as saying that thing 1 causes thing 2.
A bee's wings oscillate, but that isn't the explanation of antimatter.

The hole through the Earth example is only there to indicate the cyclic principle (direction of the oscillation steps between kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy) brought to the quantum level.

[Bored chemist]

Quote from: Kartazion on 04/12/2021 06:36:51
The hole through the Earth example is only there to indicate the cyclic principle (direction of the oscillation steps between kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy) brought to the quantum level.

Did you realise that doesn't mean anything?

[Kartazion (OP)]

Did you realise that doesn't mean anything?

You never understand the simple things. Easier you can't do. This means that the quantum particle takes the same path as the rock. So I don't see what you don't understand.

[Bored chemist]

Just because one sort of oscillator looks a little bit like another sort of oscillator does not mean they are related.
Do you understand that?

[Kartazion (OP)]

Just because one sort of oscillator looks a little bit like another sort of oscillator does not mean they are related.
Do you understand that?

No. I don't know what a sort of means in physics.

[Bored chemist]

To say you have unified them you need to show that they are two aspects of the same thing.

You have not done that.
All you have done is show  that they are sort of similar, and, as you point out "sort of" isn't really science.

[Origin]

Here is a more subtle explanation to explain dark matter and quantum vacuum and quantum chromodynamics in relation to the oscillator.

Based on how the anharmonic oscillator mechanism works, the particle's path goes through different physical stages. First it would be fair to speak of the energy flow of the particle to express dark matter and of quantum vacuum. The particle would oscillate rapidly in the vicinity of the singularity (dark matter and more quantum vacuum) and in a second time more slowly in the vicinity of the matter (chromodynamics). In this case of large displacement, where the particle oscillate rapidly, it becomes an energy flow expressed by the quantum vacuum. The convergence of the energy flow of the quantum vacuum, in a smaller space, close to the singularity, then in turn becomes dark matter. At its opposite, there is the matter expressed by quantum chromodynamics.

Quantum chromodynamics would only be a duplication of the particle itself. To be continued.

What a load of pseudoscience gibberish.

[Kartazion (OP)]

To say you have unified them you need to show that they are two aspects of the same thing.

You have not done that.
All you have done is show  that they are sort of similar, and, as you point out "sort of" isn't really science.

I will deepen the subject in the days to come. But in the meantime, I have a question for you. If a macroscopic stone oscillates, do you think that the particles or atoms of that stone oscillate in the same way? Thanks.

[Kartazion (OP)]

What a load of pseudoscience gibberish.

The entire quote was:

"Dark matter can be explained by the quantum vacuum of quantum chromodynamics" Gilles Cohen-Tannoudji, French physicist. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilles_Cohen-Tannoudji

Here is a more subtle explanation to explain dark matter and quantum vacuum and quantum chromodynamics in relation to the oscillator.

Based on how the anharmonic oscillator mechanism works, the particle's path goes through different physical stages. First it would be fair to speak of the energy flow of the particle to express dark matter and of quantum vacuum. The particle would oscillate rapidly in the vicinity of the singularity (dark matter and more quantum vacuum) and in a second time more slowly in the vicinity of the matter (chromodynamics). In this case of large displacement, where the particle oscillate rapidly, it becomes an energy flow expressed by the quantum vacuum. The convergence of the energy flow of the quantum vacuum, in a smaller space, close to the singularity, then in turn becomes dark matter. At its opposite, there is the matter expressed by quantum chromodynamics.

Quantum chromodynamics would only be a duplication of the particle itself. To be continued.

At first, I will not talk about QCD which is easier to explain, but rather about quantum vacuum and dark matter.

What do you think of this source for its explanation? Thank you.

Four reasons why the quantum vacuum may explain dark matter

[Bored chemist]

If a macroscopic stone oscillates, do you think that the particles or atoms of that stone oscillate in the same way?

The question is meaningless.
If you don't recognise that, you should go and learn some science
If you do recognise it, you should stop trolling.