The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Energy loss in electrolysis
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Energy loss in electrolysis

  • 28 Replies
  • 8517 Views
  • 1 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Energy loss in electrolysis
« Reply #20 on: 13/11/2021 17:50:10 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 13/11/2021 17:17:46
Or 27% if you look at the actual figures in the previous paragraph.
The previous paragraph says "Key headlines
In Quarter 2 2021, renewable electricity generation was 26.9 TWh, the lowest value since Quarter 2 2019,
and 9.6 per cent lower than the same quarter in 2020.
The growth rate of renewable capacity remains muted, with 134 MW added over the quarter. During the last
twelve months, capacity grew by 1.4 per cent (681 MW), most of which was in wind (both onshore and
offshore) and Solar PV"
And the problem here isn't government stats, but your apparent inability to read.
It's got nothing much to do with electrolysis- which, you may remember, you screwed up about anyway.

Maybe a passing mod can split this off.
Quote from: alancalverd on 13/11/2021 17:17:46
However you look at it, we are still a long way from delivering 75 GW of electricity continuously from renewables
The clever bit is that we don't need to.

That's the point of the focus on heat pumps.
As you said, most of our energy is used heating stuff. We can cut a big chunk out of that .
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21135
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Energy loss in electrolysis
« Reply #21 on: 14/11/2021 13:51:40 »
Not sure if you've ever used a heat pump to melt steel, make bricks,  cement, or toilets,  or even sterilise surgical linenware, but I can tell you from painful experience that they aren't all that reliable at 30 degrees, never mind 100 or 2000. Nor much use for cooking. And we burned a fair bit of fossil fuel building and installing the last one I worked with. Like we had to strip out all the old radiators, rip up the concrete floor, install a whole load of plastic insulation, lay some plastic pipes, cover them with concrete, and make a new floor. Just for one single-storey barn. If your building has wooden upper floors, I guess you'd need to strengthen the beams with steel to support the concrete, and pay the Russians and Saudis for the privilege of using their precious natural resources to do so.   
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Energy loss in electrolysis
« Reply #22 on: 14/11/2021 13:55:29 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 14/11/2021 13:51:40
Not sure if you've ever used a heat pump to melt steel, make bricks,  cement, or toilets,  or even sterilise surgical linenware, but I can tell you from painful experience that they aren't all that reliable at 30 degrees, never mind 100 or 2000. Nor much use for cooking. And we burned a fair bit of fossil fuel building and installing the last one I worked with. Like we had to strip out all the old radiators, rip up the concrete floor, install a whole load of plastic insulation, lay some plastic pipes, cover them with concrete, and make a new floor. Just for one single-storey barn. If your building has wooden upper floors, I guess you'd need to strengthen the beams with steel to support the concrete, and pay the Russians and Saudis for the privilege of using their precious natural resources to do so.   
OK, so which part of "
Quote from: Bored chemist on 13/11/2021 17:50:10
We can cut a big chunk out of that .
did you not understand?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline wolfekeeper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1678
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 79 times
Re: Energy loss in electrolysis
« Reply #23 on: 15/11/2021 03:15:54 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 13/11/2021 17:17:46
Problem is that we have no control over wind speed and sun hours.
Yeah, and the problem with petrol is that we have no control of the price or availability in fact.

IF ONLY we had a type of vehicle with a large battery with a couple of hundred mile range or so that could store solar and wind power for multiple days when it's available and use that to drive around in.
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21135
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Energy loss in electrolysis
« Reply #24 on: 15/11/2021 23:13:41 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/11/2021 13:55:29
OK, so which part of "
Quote from: Bored chemist on 13/11/2021 17:50:10
We can cut a big chunk out of that .
did you not understand?
Your use of "big".
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21135
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Energy loss in electrolysis
« Reply #25 on: 15/11/2021 23:16:25 »
Quote from: wolfekeeper on 15/11/2021 03:15:54
IF ONLY we had a type of vehicle with a large battery with a couple of hundred mile range or so that could store solar and wind power for multiple days when it's available and use that to drive around in.
That would be great, if we had enough fossil fuel to make it, enough potential solar and wind energy to run it, and some way of dealing with the CO2 emitted during its manufacture. Damn physics keeps getting in the way.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline hamdani yusuf

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11779
  • Activity:
    86%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: Energy loss in electrolysis
« Reply #26 on: 16/11/2021 04:14:22 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 15/11/2021 23:16:25
Quote from: wolfekeeper on 15/11/2021 03:15:54
IF ONLY we had a type of vehicle with a large battery with a couple of hundred mile range or so that could store solar and wind power for multiple days when it's available and use that to drive around in.
That would be great, if we had enough fossil fuel to make it, enough potential solar and wind energy to run it, and some way of dealing with the CO2 emitted during its manufacture. Damn physics keeps getting in the way.
Why do you think that they can't be done? Which physics prevent them from happening?
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21135
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Energy loss in electrolysis
« Reply #27 on: 16/11/2021 14:29:33 »
Conservation of energy. Mean solar input.

Actually it's not physics (solar airplanes have flown around the world, solar-powered cars have crossed Australia, people have been crossing the oceans in sustainable boats powered by wind for thousands of years...) but engineering: we can't make enough to satisfy demand. 
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Energy loss in electrolysis
« Reply #28 on: 16/11/2021 15:35:18 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 15/11/2021 23:16:25
Damn physics keeps getting in the way.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 16/11/2021 04:14:22
Which physics prevent them from happening?
Quote from: alancalverd on 16/11/2021 14:29:33
Actually it's not physics
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: electrolysis 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.51 seconds with 48 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.