[talanum1 (OP)]

Get back to us if that happens.
Until then, please don't try to raise it on a science page.

I must post it somewhere where scientists have access to it to inform them to be on the lookout.

[Bored chemist]

Get back to us if that happens.
Until then, please don't try to raise it on a science page.

I must post it somewhere where scientists have access to it to inform them to be on the lookout.

Why would scientists want to be on the lookout for hogwash?

[Kryptid]

For a computer to think you need some operator to load and run the program. Who does this for Humans?

Embryonic development.

There must be momentum non-conservation even if the soul is made out of energy.

Not if the soul has momentum, but like I said before:

The fact of the matter is that you can't justify one speculative case of violation of conservation of momentum by pointing out a different speculative case of violation of momentum.

It can become science if a lot of people experience it for themselves.

Can you tell us how to have this experience?

[Origin]

I must post it somewhere where scientists have access to it to inform them to be on the lookout.

This becoming a bit pathetic.

[talanum1 (OP)]

Can you tell us how to have this experience?

Just observe a Pi-minus decay, and be sure to be the only one observing it.

[Bored chemist]

Just observe a Pi-minus decay,

NOBODY CAN.
Why don't you understand that?

Only you think you can, but that's a consequence of an hallucination, not of reality.

[Origin]

Just observe a Pi-minus decay, and be sure to be the only one observing it.

Come on, I mean WTF!!?

[Kryptid]

Just observe a Pi-minus decay

How? Be specific. Explain it to me like I'm 5 years old.

[talanum1 (OP)]

How? Be specific. Explain it to me like I'm 5 years old.

Go to a particle accelerator with a cloud chamber detector and stare at it.

Not if the soul has momentum, but like I said before:

The soul causes new thoughts, so whether the momentum starts in ions in the brain or in the soul, since the soul starts new mental processes, it creates momentum from nothing.

For a computer to think you need some operator to load and run the program. Who does this for Humans?

Embryonic development.

God starts the program in babies. He says: "live" and then the mind boots up.

[Origin]

God starts the program in babies. He says: "live" and then the mind boots up.

Do we have a religion subforum for this?  We have not been discussing science for quite awhile in this thread.

[Kryptid]

Go to a particle accelerator with a cloud chamber detector and stare at it.

You said earlier that you weren't at a particle accelerator when you sensed the pion decay.

If I do sense something, how I am supposed to know it's pion decay and not neutron decay or something else?

The soul causes new thoughts, so whether the momentum starts in ions in the brain or in the soul, since the soul starts new mental processes, it creates momentum from nothing.

That's not how that works. When you start a car and it begins to move forward, momentum wasn't created from nothing. It's pushing back on the road just as much as the road is pushing forward on it. That means the total momentum hasn't changed. There's no reason to believe that such would not also be true of a soul causing movement.

But like I have said twice already...

you can't justify one speculative case of violation of conservation of momentum by pointing out a different speculative case of violation of momentum.

[Bored chemist]

God starts the program in babies. He says: "live" and then the mind boots up.

And, unless you can provide evidence for that, you just proved that you are trolling

[talanum1 (OP)]

If I do sense something, how I am supposed to know it's pion decay and not neutron decay or something else?

They can produce a Pi-minus.

That's not how that works. When you start a car and it begins to move forward, momentum wasn't created from nothing. It's pushing back on the road just as much as the road is pushing forward on it. That means the total momentum hasn't changed. There's no reason to believe that such would not also be true of a soul causing movement.

To balance the momentum of the ions, the soul must have momentum in the opposite direction. What then stops the soul from exiting the brain?

[Bored chemist]

What then stops the soul from exiting the brain?

The soul doesn't exist and therefore can't do anything.

[Kryptid]

They can produce a Pi-minus.

No, I'm asking how I'm supposed to know that any particular thing I happen to see in my mind is supposed to represent any specific particle?

You also didn't address my issue about you not being at a particle accelerator yourself.

To balance the momentum of the ions, the soul must have momentum in the opposite direction. What then stops the soul from exiting the brain?

Presumably whatever keeps the soul from exiting your brain when you walk. I'm done talking about the soul here. Any time you bring it up again in an attempt to justify violation of momentum conservation, I'm going to repeat this phrase:

"You can't justify one speculative case of violation of conservation of momentum by pointing out a different speculative case of violation of momentum."

Your particle violates momentum conservation. It's falsified.

[talanum1 (OP)]

No, I'm asking how I'm supposed to know that any particular thing I happen to see in my mind is supposed to represent any specific particle?

They look at the decay products and if the trajectory makes a great circle in a magnetic field.

You also didn't address my issue about you not being at a particle accelerator yourself.

I said I weren't at a particle accelerator. It is hard to believe but I saw a pi-minus decay.

Your particle violates momentum conservation. It's falsified.

It does not violate momentum conservation since L⁰ does not carry momentum.

Presumably whatever keeps the soul from exiting your brain when you walk.

That means the soul's momentum must be cancelled - violating momentum conservation.

[Bored chemist]

but I saw a pi-minus decay.

That which can be stated without evidence can be dismissed in the same way.
In reality, you imagined a pi-minus decay.

[Kryptid]

They look at the decay products

Who is "they"?

and if the trajectory makes a great circle in a magnetic field.

And how is that supposed to tell me what particles I am seeing?

I said I weren't at a particle accelerator.

That's exactly my point. Why are you telling me to go to a particle accelerator to look for particles when you didn't do so yourself?

It is hard to believe but I saw a pi-minus decay.

And how do you know that's what you observed? Give me a good line of reasoning that what you saw in your head specifically represented such a thing.

It does not violate momentum conservation since L0 does not carry momentum.

That's exactly why it does violate conservation of momentum. When it interacts with another particle, it must transfer energy to that particle. That changes the second particle's momentum. Since there was zero momentum before the interaction and non-zero momentum after the interaction, then momentum conservation is violated.

That means the soul's momentum must be cancelled - violating momentum conservation.

You don't know how momentum conservation works, do you? Do you think momentum conservation is violated just because the wind doesn't blow my hair off of my head?

You can't justify one speculative case of violation of conservation of momentum by pointing out a different speculative case of violation of conservation of momentum.

[talanum1 (OP)]

Who is "they"?

The Physicists working at a particle collider.

And how is that supposed to tell me what particles I am seeing?

In a given magnetic field, positively charged particles turn in the opposite direction as negatively charged particles, while neutral particles goes straight.

And how do you know that's what you observed? Give me a good line of reasoning that what you saw in your head specifically represented such a thing.

I know because I felt the L⁰ entering my mind.

That's exactly why it does violate conservation of momentum. When it interacts with another particle, it must transfer energy to that particle. That changes the second particle's momentum.

It never gets a transfer of energy, the energy was always there in the pi-minus. It doesn't have speed but it can quantum jump to inside the observer's mind. Actually it need not jump into the observers mind, it just can just sit in space.

You can't justify one speculative case of violation of conservation of momentum by pointing out a different speculative case of violation of conservation of momentum.

I am not trying to, I'm just going with the flow.

[Bored chemist]

I know because I felt the L0 entering my mind.

You need to realise that that sort of comment isn't science.