[Kartazion (OP)]

What else?

You can't learn physics by reading quotes.
Pretty much every conclusion you came up with in your harmonic oscillatory thread was wrong.

What is the harmonic oscillator doing here? What is the relationship with evolution?

[Kartazion (OP)]

What else?

[Kartazion (OP)]

According to @Origin I would be wrong about something and he thinks that quantum mechanics is predictable and totally in tune with reality.

That leads to huge misunderstandings.

[Origin]

What is the harmonic oscillator doing here? What is the relationship with evolution?

Uh, you asked, "what else", so I gave you a what else.  Since you brought up quantum mechanics, which isn't about evolution I didn't think it would be a problem.

[Origin]

he thinks that quantum mechanics is predictable and totally in tune with reality.

I don't recall saying that.  Seems like you are making stuff up.

[Kartazion (OP)]

So my OP is right.

[Origin]

So my OP is right.

You sure do jump to a lot of unwarranted conclusions...

[Kartazion (OP)]

You sure do jump to a lot of unwarranted conclusions...

Like what?

[Kartazion (OP)]

That I correct these unwarranted conclusions...

[Kartazion (OP)]

I give you a new openness to the discussion ; Get one's teeth into something.

You can't learn physics by reading quotes.

"imagination is more important than knowledge" Albert Einstein

Since you brought up quantum mechanics, which isn't about evolution...

Quantum mechanics is the underlying reason and tool for the constitution of relativistic physics, and allows evolution to occur. The lack of scientific criteria/arguments to develop a viable theory is similar between quantum mechanics and evolution at the level of its interpretation. Indeed without quantum mechanics (without atomic structure) we have nothing left.

There is no need for a "common sense" explanation for evolution because science isn't based on common sense. Instead, it is based on evidence.

So what are the scientific evidences in relation to evolution?

... So there is then no point in trying to figure anything out at all.

This is not reasoning worthy of a scientist. Don't let go.

Due to its factor of uncertainty.

Wrong translation leads to wrong interpretation.

And Wrong interpretation leads to wrong translation.

The misunderstanding of which speak is a trifle. You have played a small card with a touch of ambiguity. Take a look here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty ... What I deplore is that this is the only contradictory argument that you have found. Conclusion This does not call into question everything that has been said so far. So?

PS: Heisenberg used the word "Ungenauigkeit" ("indeterminacy") 

[Origin]

Quantum mechanics is the underlying reason and tool for the constitution of relativistic physics, and allows evolution to occur.

Nope.  Special relativity, general relativity and evolution all predate quantum mechanics.

"imagination is more important than knowledge" Albert Einstein

"Imagination without knowledge is fantasy", Me.

So what are the scientific evidences in relation to evolution?

This is a tough one.
Go to 'Google'
Type into the search bar 'what are the scientific evidences for evolution'.
Read the results.

[Kartazion (OP)]

Nope.  Special relativity, general relativity and evolution all predate quantum mechanics.

So you confirm that quantum mechanics stems from classical physics? In other words, it's classical physics that create quantum mechanics?

Indeed without quantum mechanics (without atomic structure) we have nothing left.

"Imagination without knowledge is fantasy", Me.

Not bad! But the idea of ​​a creator is not fantasy and does not require any special knowledge.

Type into the search bar 'what are the scientific evidences for evolution'.
Read the results.

Evidence for evolution comes from many different areas of biology. What is the common sense to this cause? Divine or accidental? It cannot be accidental simply because the biological process is intelligently ordered.

[Origin]

So you confirm that quantum mechanics stems from classical physics?

Of course.  Many experimental results and observations could not be answered by classical physics and as a result quantum physics was developed.

But the idea of ​​a creator is not fantasy

There is no evidence of a creator or intelligence involved in evolution, so saying that there is a creator would be fantasy.

What is the common sense to this cause?

Natural selection.  Neither divine nor accident.

[Kartazion (OP)]

Of course.  Many experimental results and observations could not be answered by classical physics and as a result quantum physics was developed.

@Origin there was a misunderstanding. I speak at the level of functioning of the mechanics of the physical system (constitution) and not the study of the disciplines. It is thanks to quantum mechanics, the atom to be precise, that matter exists. So I was saying that thanks to the atom, matter exists.

Watched and reread:

Quantum mechanics is the underlying reason and tool for the constitution of relativistic physics, and allows evolution to occur. The lack of scientific criteria/arguments to develop a viable theory is similar between quantum mechanics and evolution at the level of its interpretation. Indeed without quantum mechanics (without atomic structure) we have nothing left.

There is no evidence of a creator or intelligence involved in evolution, ...

One chance out of two.

[Origin]

Quantum mechanics is the underlying reason and tool for the constitution of relativistic physics, and allows evolution to occur. The lack of scientific criteria/arguments to develop a viable theory is similar between quantum mechanics and evolution at the level of its interpretation. Indeed without quantum mechanics (without atomic structure) we have nothing left.

That's silly.  Quantum mechanics never comes into the explanation of evolution or relativity.  Yes you need atoms but that is kind of obvious.  You also need the strong force and the weak force or you wouldn't have atoms - but that is besides the point.
You don't need to understand quantum mechanics to use a wrench.  You don't need quantum mechanics to learn how to fly a hot air balloon.  You don't need quantum mechanics to understand relativity or evolution.  That is just the way it is.

[Origin]

There is no evidence of a creator or intelligence involved in evolution

One chance out of two.

I have no idea what that answer is supposed to mean.

[Kartazion (OP)]

That's silly.  Quantum mechanics never comes into the explanation of evolution or relativity. ...

I never wanted to explain evolution with quantum mechanics. Why did you say that?

One chance out of two.

I have no idea what that answer is supposed to mean.

There is a 50% chance that a creator or intelligence is involved in evolution, and there is a 50% chance that a creator or intelligence isn't involved in evolution.

[Origin]

I never wanted to explain evolution with quantum mechanics. Why did you say that?

That's what I thought you were saying, translation issue I suppose.

There is a 50% chance that a creator or intelligence is involved in evolution, and there is a 50% chance that a creator or intelligence isn't involved in evolution.

No there isn't.  There is no evidence that there is a creator involved at all so how could there possibly be a 50 percent chance?
If I see an unidentified flying object, I guess you could say it is either terrestrial or an alien.  It is not a 50% - 50% chance it is an alien or terrestrial, it is almost a 100% chance it is terrestrial.

[Kartazion (OP)]

That's what I thought you were saying, translation issue I suppose.

In simple terms I said that the atom makes the matter and that the evolution uses the matter to exist.

No there isn't.  There is no evidence that there is a creator involved at all so how could there possibly be a 50 percent chance?
If I see an unidentified flying object, I guess you could say it is either terrestrial or an alien.  It is not a 50% - 50% chance it is an alien or terrestrial, it is almost a 100% chance it is terrestrial.

I agree.

[Kartazion (OP)]

Just to understand:

Does this quote:

Quantum mechanics is the underlying reason and tool for the constitution of relativistic physics, and allows evolution to occur.

is different from:

... the atom makes the matter and that the evolution uses the matter to exist.

?