The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 24   Go Down

How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?

  • 463 Replies
  • 134766 Views
  • 5 Tags

0 Members and 35 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11801
  • Activity:
    91%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #120 on: 06/01/2024 12:19:07 »
Quote from: Halc on 06/01/2024 00:41:07
Quote
Some even declare that there is no paradox even without analyzing the situation from the perspective of traveling twin.
That would be correct. There is not paradox no matter how you look at it. It only becomes paradoxical if one drags in biases from outside of relativity theory.
We can make statements without further explanation. But they will remain as hypotheses. Our confidence in the validity of a statement depends on the quality of its explanations.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 



Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11801
  • Activity:
    91%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #121 on: 06/01/2024 13:06:58 »
Quote from: varsigma on 06/01/2024 09:29:53
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 04/01/2024 08:15:15
Can you find a YouTube video on the subject that doesn't contain mistakes?
Yes, you can.

Look for lectures on special relativity by people like Susskind, or any from the likes of MIT or UC. Google is your friend; just type in the right words.
Do they use general theory of relativity framework? Or they strict to special theory of relativity instead?
Do they take Doppler effect into account?
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11801
  • Activity:
    91%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #122 on: 06/01/2024 13:15:56 »
Quote from: Zer0 on 05/01/2024 18:07:38
ps - is there any possible way U could avoid using SR/GR & give a Simplistic answer.
Do you prefer Galilean Relativity?
There are some theories in this framework. Ritzian or ballistic relativity says that light speed is constant relative to the source, based on observed star aberration.
Observations of binary stars were used to refute this theory.

Maxwellian relativity says that light speed is constant relative to the medium. In vacuum of space, the medium is called aether.
Null result of Michelson-Morley experiment is compatible with ballistic relativity but not with aether. That's why Lorentz proposed length contraction to make up for the discrepancy.
« Last Edit: 06/01/2024 14:52:53 by hamdani yusuf »
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21151
  • Activity:
    73%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #123 on: 06/01/2024 14:29:22 »
I don't recall Maxwell mentioning relativity. He simply proposed a formula for the propagation of an electromagnetic wave.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11801
  • Activity:
    91%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #124 on: 06/01/2024 14:54:37 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 06/01/2024 14:29:22
I don't recall Maxwell mentioning relativity. He simply proposed a formula for the propagation of an electromagnetic wave.
He thought that light speed is constant relative to aether. That's what motivated MMX in the first place.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 



Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11801
  • Activity:
    91%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #125 on: 06/01/2024 15:32:12 »
Quote from: Halc on 06/01/2024 00:41:07
Quote
Quote from: Origin on Yesterday at 19:19:01
If the  lights were synchronized at zero m/s, then no matter how fast you were going they would stay synchronized.

Not true. Them being synced is a frame dependent thing, and after acceleration, they'd be synced in neither the train frame nor the original frame, although at 0.01c, they'd be really close to being in sync in the original frame.
In zero's scenario, both blinking lights are standing still relative to each other. They are accelerated uniformly, which means nothing breaks the symmetry, and they should stay synchronized regardless of the final speed of the spacecraft.
« Last Edit: 06/01/2024 15:36:44 by hamdani yusuf »
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

Offline varsigma

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 412
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 24 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #126 on: 06/01/2024 15:58:02 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 06/01/2024 13:06:58
Do they use general theory of relativity framework? Or they strict to special theory of relativity instead?
Do they take Doppler effect into account?
My suggestion is that you type the following into your search bar: "special relativity lectures".
After hitting return, you'll get a lot of hits. Try some of the material from universities, they have to teach the "right stuff", 'cause they just do.
Logged
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11801
  • Activity:
    91%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #127 on: 06/01/2024 16:03:12 »
Quote from: Halc on 06/01/2024 00:41:07
Quote
Quote
IOW the light from both sources would continue to hit you at exactly the same time.
Sorry but no. The front one hits you first since you're moving toward it in the frame in which the two blinks are synced.
It would provide absolute reference frame. You would know your absolute velocity without referring to external object. Which is in contradiction to the first postulate of special theory of relativity.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11801
  • Activity:
    91%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #128 on: 06/01/2024 16:04:09 »
Quote from: varsigma on 06/01/2024 15:58:02
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 06/01/2024 13:06:58
Do they use general theory of relativity framework? Or they strict to special theory of relativity instead?
Do they take Doppler effect into account?
My suggestion is that you type the following into your search bar: "special relativity lectures".
After hitting return, you'll get a lot of hits. Try some of the material from universities, they have to teach the "right stuff", 'cause they just do.
Have you watched them yourself?
Can you summarize what they say?
What makes them more trustworthy than the others?
« Last Edit: 06/01/2024 16:08:03 by hamdani yusuf »
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 



Offline varsigma

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 412
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 24 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #129 on: 06/01/2024 16:20:42 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 06/01/2024 16:04:09
Have you watched them yourself?
I have watched some of them. Different lecturers go over the same material in different ways. That's one of the take aways
Quote
Can you summarize what they say?
Probably. If I could be bothered.
Quote
What makes them more trustworthy than the others?
Well, there is the fact that they have a reputation to uphold. All those fee-paying students learning the wrong ideas would be quite the scandal, don't you think?
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21151
  • Activity:
    73%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #130 on: 06/01/2024 22:43:00 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 06/01/2024 14:54:37
Quote from: alancalverd on 06/01/2024 14:29:22
I don't recall Maxwell mentioning relativity. He simply proposed a formula for the propagation of an electromagnetic wave.
He thought that light speed is constant relative to aether. That's what motivated MMX in the first place.
I have no idea what he thought. What he proved was that em radiation can propagate at a speed c = 1/√(εμ) where ε and μ are constants that can be measured at any frequency for any medium or no medium.

In the case of propagation through a vacuum,  it is obvious that they are not frequency-dependent (since there is no material present) so we have the remarkable result that you can calculate the speed of light in vacuo from experiments with direct current electricity in a laboratory.

Furthermore, there being no material present, ε0 and μ0 must be isotropic, so the speed of light is independent of direction in free space.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21151
  • Activity:
    73%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #131 on: 06/01/2024 22:51:47 »
Quote from: Origin on 05/01/2024 19:19:01
If the  lights were synchronized at zero m/s, then no matter how fast you were going they would stay synchronized. 
Alas no. If you define 0 m/s as being the state at which they were synchronised, then in order to reach any other speed hey must have been accelerated. If they are accelerated along the axis of propagation, this is equivalent to placing them in a divergent gravitational field, and the Pound-Rebka experiment  demonstrated the resulting asynchronicity.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11801
  • Activity:
    91%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #132 on: 06/01/2024 23:34:38 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 06/01/2024 22:43:00
I have no idea what he thought.
I can ask Google Bard.
Quote
James Clerk Maxwell's view on the aether was complex and evolved throughout his career. Here's a summary:

Early Acceptance (1860s):

Initially, Maxwell embraced the aether concept, believing it necessary for explaining light propagation as transverse vibrations. His famous equations for electromagnetism were built upon the aether model.
He saw the aether as a stationary, elastic medium permeating all space, capable of transmitting electromagnetic waves without significant energy loss.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 



Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11801
  • Activity:
    91%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #133 on: 07/01/2024 00:12:22 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 06/01/2024 22:51:47
If they are accelerated along the axis of propagation, this is equivalent to placing them in a divergent gravitational field,
Acceleration isn't equivalent with a divergent gravitational field.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11801
  • Activity:
    91%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #134 on: 07/01/2024 03:33:36 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 18/06/2023 22:49:06
Quote from: Halc on 17/06/2023 03:36:32
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 17/06/2023 01:02:06
Let me rephrase my statement you quoted.
His onboarding clock ticks slower on average than the giant clocks.
Which clock ticks faster is a frame dependent thing, and no frame was specified, so no, this isn't correct.
Relative to Earth, the ship clock ticks slower. Relative to some inertial frame in which the ship is stationary, the Earth clock and all the giant clocks tick slower.

 
Quote
Traveling twin sees the giant clock the he is passing by showing the time according to Origin's calculation.
Earth clock ~ 4
Second clock ~ 5
Third clock ~ 6
Fourth clock ~ 7
Star clock ~ 8, then return.
Fourth clock ~ 9
Third clock ~ 10
Second clock ~ 11
Earth clock ~ 12
Yes. This is consistent with the numbers in my prior post.
For instance, from the ship PoV, at the start, the 2nd clock appears to read 3 (just like you said in post 36).  16.3 days later when the 2nd clock passes by, it reads 5, which means it appears to run ~45x  as fast because it is approaching, exactly the rate that I posted.
Let's pair the values of the giant clocks with travelling clock.
Earth clock ~ 4Y --- 0 d
Second clock ~ 5Y --- 16.3 d
Third clock ~ 6Y --- 32.6 d
Fourth clock ~ 7Y --- 49 d
Star clock ~ 8Y --- 65.3 d, then return.
Fourth clock ~ 9Y --- 81.6 d
Third clock ~ 10Y --- 97.9 d
Second clock ~ 11Y --- 114.2 d
Earth clock ~ 12Y --- 130.6 d
Observers on giant clocks and travelling clock should agree with these values.
In the travelling twin's frame, the giant clocks should tick slower than his own. Thus when he arrives at the star, it should have increased by a smaller amount than his own. Can anyone explain the discrepancy?
« Last Edit: 07/01/2024 04:56:28 by hamdani yusuf »
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21151
  • Activity:
    73%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #135 on: 07/01/2024 13:52:08 »
Just shows that you can't trust Google Bard. There is no mention of aether in Maxwell's equations.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Eternal Student

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1830
  • Activity:
    6.5%
  • Thanked: 470 times
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #136 on: 07/01/2024 18:56:28 »
Hi.

There's a post here:    https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86033.msg719317#msg719317
 which was related to this forum thread.  It was posted around the same time this forum thread was relocated, split into two or whatever happened.   It's ended up staying with a different thread and that's OK - it's reasonable in that thread.

Best Wishes.
Logged
 



Offline Zer0

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1932
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 232 times
  • Email & Nickname Alerts Off! P.M. Blocked!
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #137 on: 08/01/2024 20:12:39 »
Recap!

i am in my Spacecraft at Rest.
2 Blinkers, front & back, Synchronised.
Gradual Acceleration until 1%c attained.
I am standing facing Sideways, utilizing Peripheral vision.
Left eye tracking Front & Right eye tracking Back.

Because Craft is moving Forward...
Front blinking light has to cover less distance/space.
Back blinking light has to cover more distance/space.

Hence, i see Front Blinker flickering more Frequently than the Back Blinker.


Now...Please tell me...
How the Heck am i seeing the Front one faster/more?

Left side of my body is Ageing faster than Right side?
OR
My Left Brain & Right Brain have Unsynchronized with each other?
OR
i am just in a pub drunk out n totally wazted n those blinkerz are discoballz n the barmaid just offered me a shot of ayahuasca!


ps - The Speed of Light remains Constant...ALWAYS!
Logged
1N73LL1G3NC3  15  7H3  481L17Y  70  4D4P7  70  CH4NG3.
 

Offline pzkpfw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 121
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 10 times
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #138 on: 08/01/2024 22:19:07 »
Quote from: Zer0 on 08/01/2024 20:12:39
... Because Craft is moving Forward ...

According to whom is the craft moving forward? You, at rest in it?
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Halc

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21151
  • Activity:
    73%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Reply #139 on: 08/01/2024 23:49:01 »
Quote from: Zer0 on 08/01/2024 20:12:39
Because Craft is moving Forward...
Front blinking light has to cover less distance/space.
Back blinking light has to cover more distance/space.
Why aren't you standing equidistant between them?

At which point Bondi's ghost says "how would you know you are equidistant?" and the argument becomes intriguingly circular.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 24   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: twins paradox  / time dilation  / simultaneity  / general relativity  / special relativity 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.095 seconds with 69 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.