The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. How many spots are produced from Stern-Gerlach apparatus that rotates?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

How many spots are produced from Stern-Gerlach apparatus that rotates?

  • 60 Replies
  • 62782 Views
  • 1 Tags

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline varsigma

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 412
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 24 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: How many spots are produced from Stern-Gerlach apparatus that rotates?
« Reply #60 on: 25/12/2024 14:35:57 »
I'll go over what I was attempting to do.

I made an assumption about light, particles of light, and that this meant I could "decompose" a beam of light, into half-beams until there was no beam.  A naive algorithm that assumed something about an algebra and linearity.

Now I see that I need to refine this idea considerably, perhaps not looking at intensities, but polarization angles as the basis of a linear system. A measurement basis. This set of angles and positions for polarizing filters is the physical basis. Now I need to characterize the Hilbert space, and if linearity is somehow a necessary condition, then I will be using a complex vector space. Who cares why, it works.

. . . another detail is that your observables are equivalent to what you can do to the equipment. Operators and observables are now in the same set. Sometimes quanta will delay this, and ignore what you've done to the positions of say, optical filters, even if you know what the angle is, so you have information about half the state of each input beam.

The other half seems to be sort of up for grabs, somehow . . .
« Last Edit: 26/12/2024 02:24:34 by varsigma »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: stern-gerlach experiment 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.364 seconds with 28 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.