0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
In this observational evidence there is no UFO's caveman.jpg (79.78 kB . 480x370 - viewed 18565 times)The rudiment of thinking about technology, the start of science and Physics. To plant a thought is to grow a seed.
Quote from: Thebox on 28/10/2017 13:41:18In this observational evidence there is no UFO's caveman.jpg (79.78 kB . 480x370 - viewed 18565 times)The rudiment of thinking about technology, the start of science and Physics. To plant a thought is to grow a seed.I seem to remember seeing a similar picture that people thought proved the existence of UFO's, though in reality it could be classed as an IFO, seen as it is identified. Though in this case, it was in Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs. I'll see if I can find it now.
Quote from: atbsphotography on 30/10/2017 12:45:23Quote from: Thebox on 28/10/2017 13:41:18In this observational evidence there is no UFO's caveman.jpg (79.78 kB . 480x370 - viewed 18565 times)The rudiment of thinking about technology, the start of science and Physics. To plant a thought is to grow a seed.I seem to remember seeing a similar picture that people thought proved the existence of UFO's, though in reality it could be classed as an IFO, seen as it is identified. Though in this case, it was in Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs. I'll see if I can find it now.That is an ancient picture and a IFO. Logic says P=1 of alien existence , this single picture is enough proof . They did not draw just a UFO, they drew what they sore in some great detail. In this picture it looks like the aliens are showing the hunters how to hunt , helping them with food. Or on the other hand they could be pissed off because the hunters have killed.
Quote from: Thebox on 30/10/2017 12:48:47Quote from: atbsphotography on 30/10/2017 12:45:23Quote from: Thebox on 28/10/2017 13:41:18In this observational evidence there is no UFO's caveman.jpg (79.78 kB . 480x370 - viewed 18565 times)The rudiment of thinking about technology, the start of science and Physics. To plant a thought is to grow a seed.I seem to remember seeing a similar picture that people thought proved the existence of UFO's, though in reality it could be classed as an IFO, seen as it is identified. Though in this case, it was in Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs. I'll see if I can find it now.That is an ancient picture and a IFO. Logic says P=1 of alien existence , this single picture is enough proof . They did not draw just a UFO, they drew what they sore in some great detail. In this picture it looks like the aliens are showing the hunters how to hunt , helping them with food. Or on the other hand they could be pissed off because the hunters have killed.They could well be angry of our ability to hunt to eat, I should think if they are an intelligent race then they must, in theory, have found ways to source nutrition without hunting animals, or animals may not exist in their alternate reality.If P=1 and then Q+P=1 then Q must be fact if P=1 is existence. So this picture may point to Q+P=1 and being a factual existence of aliens.
Quote from: atbsphotography on 30/10/2017 12:58:09Quote from: Thebox on 30/10/2017 12:48:47Quote from: atbsphotography on 30/10/2017 12:45:23Quote from: Thebox on 28/10/2017 13:41:18In this observational evidence there is no UFO's caveman.jpg (79.78 kB . 480x370 - viewed 18565 times)The rudiment of thinking about technology, the start of science and Physics. To plant a thought is to grow a seed.I seem to remember seeing a similar picture that people thought proved the existence of UFO's, though in reality it could be classed as an IFO, seen as it is identified. Though in this case, it was in Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs. I'll see if I can find it now.That is an ancient picture and a IFO. Logic says P=1 of alien existence , this single picture is enough proof . They did not draw just a UFO, they drew what they sore in some great detail. In this picture it looks like the aliens are showing the hunters how to hunt , helping them with food. Or on the other hand they could be pissed off because the hunters have killed.They could well be angry of our ability to hunt to eat, I should think if they are an intelligent race then they must, in theory, have found ways to source nutrition without hunting animals, or animals may not exist in their alternate reality.If P=1 and then Q+P=1 then Q must be fact if P=1 is existence. So this picture may point to Q+P=1 and being a factual existence of aliens.Well the logic involved is simple. At that time the P=0 of somebody having a creative thought to draw a flying saucer. The thoughts on flying at the most could of been about birds... This is a shared memory rather than a subjective thought. And sorry what is Q representing?
Quote from: Thebox on 30/10/2017 13:14:04Quote from: atbsphotography on 30/10/2017 12:58:09Quote from: Thebox on 30/10/2017 12:48:47Quote from: atbsphotography on 30/10/2017 12:45:23Quote from: Thebox on 28/10/2017 13:41:18In this observational evidence there is no UFO's caveman.jpg (79.78 kB . 480x370 - viewed 18565 times)The rudiment of thinking about technology, the start of science and Physics. To plant a thought is to grow a seed.I seem to remember seeing a similar picture that people thought proved the existence of UFO's, though in reality it could be classed as an IFO, seen as it is identified. Though in this case, it was in Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs. I'll see if I can find it now.That is an ancient picture and a IFO. Logic says P=1 of alien existence , this single picture is enough proof . They did not draw just a UFO, they drew what they sore in some great detail. In this picture it looks like the aliens are showing the hunters how to hunt , helping them with food. Or on the other hand they could be pissed off because the hunters have killed.They could well be angry of our ability to hunt to eat, I should think if they are an intelligent race then they must, in theory, have found ways to source nutrition without hunting animals, or animals may not exist in their alternate reality.If P=1 and then Q+P=1 then Q must be fact if P=1 is existence. So this picture may point to Q+P=1 and being a factual existence of aliens.Well the logic involved is simple. At that time the P=0 of somebody having a creative thought to draw a flying saucer. The thoughts on flying at the most could of been about birds... This is a shared memory rather than a subjective thought. And sorry what is Q representing?Sorry I had it the wrong way round it should have been P+Q=1 which means P is thought and Q is fact, both together would mean 1 is evidential rather than just thought or fact on their own.
Given that the image you posted is actual artwork done by someone as an art history class assignment, it doesn't prove anything about aliens: https://jack-lambert.deviantart.com/art/Cave-Painting-324650059.
If ancient pictures are proof of the existence of something, then I guess all of those carvings and paintings of Horus, Baal, fairies and dragons are proof that they are real as well?
I am back to P=1 . There is nothing you have shown that disproves the observation of an identified alien present in our past.
Quote from: Thebox on 30/10/2017 20:22:09I am back to P=1 . There is nothing you have shown that disproves the observation of an identified alien present in our past. First of all, I am not trying to disprove ancient interactions between humans and aliens. I allow for the possibility of it even though I can't say for sure one way or another. I can say that it definitely hasn't been proven. Second of all, you are shifting the burden of proof. It is not for others to prove you wrong, it is up to you to prove yourself correct. All you have done is shown inconclusive (and at least one fake) image(s). That's not proof of anything.
Regardless of the images I provided there are plenty of pics and videos out there that show these type illustrations.
I accept these pics themselves are not evidence on there own. However when people are drawing the same type thing in different locations around the world, I think that alone shows us they are all seeing the same thing and drawing what they have seen. [ You are not allowed to view attachments ] These drawings are certainly alien to the picture.
Quote from: Kryptid on 30/10/2017 20:32:17Quote from: Thebox on 30/10/2017 20:22:09I am back to P=1 . There is nothing you have shown that disproves the observation of an identified alien present in our past. First of all, I am not trying to disprove ancient interactions between humans and aliens. I allow for the possibility of it even though I can't say for sure one way or another. I can say that it definitely hasn't been proven. Second of all, you are shifting the burden of proof. It is not for others to prove you wrong, it is up to you to prove yourself correct. All you have done is shown inconclusive (and at least one fake) image(s). That's not proof of anything.Regardless of the images I provided there are plenty of pics and videos out there that show these type illustrations. I accept these pics themselves are not evidence on there own. However when people are drawing the same type thing in different locations around the world, I think that alone shows us they are all seeing the same thing and drawing what they have seen. [ Invalid Attachment ] These drawings are certainly alien to the picture.
Quote from: Thebox on 30/10/2017 20:43:15Quote from: Kryptid on 30/10/2017 20:32:17Quote from: Thebox on 30/10/2017 20:22:09I am back to P=1 . There is nothing you have shown that disproves the observation of an identified alien present in our past. First of all, I am not trying to disprove ancient interactions between humans and aliens. I allow for the possibility of it even though I can't say for sure one way or another. I can say that it definitely hasn't been proven. Second of all, you are shifting the burden of proof. It is not for others to prove you wrong, it is up to you to prove yourself correct. All you have done is shown inconclusive (and at least one fake) image(s). That's not proof of anything.Regardless of the images I provided there are plenty of pics and videos out there that show these type illustrations. I accept these pics themselves are not evidence on there own. However when people are drawing the same type thing in different locations around the world, I think that alone shows us they are all seeing the same thing and drawing what they have seen. [ Invalid Attachment ] These drawings are certainly alien to the picture. Are you really that credulous? The image is faked. See pinterest posQuote from: The Spoon on 30/10/2017 21:24:18Quote from: Thebox on 30/10/2017 20:43:15Quote from: Kryptid on 30/10/2017 20:32:17Quote from: Thebox on 30/10/2017 20:22:09I am back to P=1 . There is nothing you have shown that disproves the observation of an identified alien present in our past. First of all, I am not trying to disprove ancient interactions between humans and aliens. I allow for the possibility of it even though I can't say for sure one way or another. I can say that it definitely hasn't been proven. Second of all, you are shifting the burden of proof. It is not for others to prove you wrong, it is up to you to prove yourself correct. All you have done is shown inconclusive (and at least one fake) image(s). That's not proof of anything.Regardless of the images I provided there are plenty of pics and videos out there that show these type illustrations. I accept these pics themselves are not evidence on there own. However when people are drawing the same type thing in different locations around the world, I think that alone shows us they are all seeing the same thing and drawing what they have seen. [ Invalid Attachment ] These drawings are certainly alien to the picture. Are you really that credulous? The image is faked. See pinterest post with original image and the doctoring of it here:https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/249598004327326865/I am afraid google search is out of my control, I never noticed that either. Maybe I will have better luck with a video , pay attention to the last picture 3 mins into the video.//www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBJ3aE4EQgw
Quote from: Thebox on 30/10/2017 20:43:15Quote from: Kryptid on 30/10/2017 20:32:17Quote from: Thebox on 30/10/2017 20:22:09I am back to P=1 . There is nothing you have shown that disproves the observation of an identified alien present in our past. First of all, I am not trying to disprove ancient interactions between humans and aliens. I allow for the possibility of it even though I can't say for sure one way or another. I can say that it definitely hasn't been proven. Second of all, you are shifting the burden of proof. It is not for others to prove you wrong, it is up to you to prove yourself correct. All you have done is shown inconclusive (and at least one fake) image(s). That's not proof of anything.Regardless of the images I provided there are plenty of pics and videos out there that show these type illustrations. I accept these pics themselves are not evidence on there own. However when people are drawing the same type thing in different locations around the world, I think that alone shows us they are all seeing the same thing and drawing what they have seen. [ Invalid Attachment ] These drawings are certainly alien to the picture. Are you really that credulous? The image is faked. See pinterest post with original image and the doctoring of it here:https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/249598004327326865/
Are you really that credulous? The image is faked. See pinterest post with original image and the doctoring of it here:https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/249598004327326865/
I am afraid google search is out of my control, I never noticed that either. Maybe I will have better luck with a video , pay attention to the last picture 3 mins into the video.